Why a fodder budget is essential this winter

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.
Don’t go into winter without conducting a fodder budget, Barenbrug has advised, following the challenging weather events that have played havoc with silage reserves across the country.

Janet Montgomery, Barenbrug’s agriculture product manager, says that with both quality and quantity affected by this year’s weather, it is essential to assess forage reserves to ensure they’re sufficient for the winter ahead.

“Will it last? Will it provide the performance you need?” Janet asks. “You need to work out those answers and act accordingly.

“We’re not facing an emergency, but neither is there 100% confidence that the country has sufficient forage quantities and qualities.

“There is a chance that feed will be short. But if you act now, and plan, then you won’t get caught out later,” she suggests.

Dry cows and milkers will need up to 1.5t of silage per month, Janet points out. “The first step should be to check how much you have, and whether it’s enough for the winter months. And to do that effectively, you also need to decide now the condition in which you want to leave pastures at the end of 2024.

“There’s always a risk in assuming that pastures will ‘come back’ in time for spring. Ask too much of them during the critical autumn period – for example, by not managing residuals properly, or not indexing fields to prioritise grazing, or reseeding – and they won’t be ready for you in 2025. Then your fodder budget will have been for naught.

“But protect them, and pastures will pay you back handsomely.”

To measure approximate quantities in the clamp, multiply length of the pit by width by average height to calculate the silage volume. Divide that figure by 1.35 for the amount in fresh tonnes. Then take the average silage requirement per day and multiply that by the number of animals to feed, by the number of feeding days required.

“You’ll then be able to compare demand and supply of silage, and see if there’s likely to be a deficit.”

It’s best to assume that winter will be difficult, Janet says, so plan for the worst. “If you’re conservative about when to house the cows, even if it means breaking into the clamp earlier, there’s a good chance that the grass will be ready when you want it.”

Quantity’s one thing, but there are also questions about the quality of much of this year’s silage, with late cuts in particular displaying low biomass and nutritional content.

“If there’s one time you don’t want to merely estimate silage quality, it’s now,” Janet stresses. “You really need to know what you’re feeding, so the second step is to test and analyse your silage, and to calculate your dry matter content. Then you’ll know what supplements you’ll require and can plan accordingly.

“Yes, bought-in supplements will always be more expensive than home-grown feed but by knowing exactly what you will need to balance energy and protein, to maintain your performance targets, you can plan ahead and map out your options in good time.

“Treat the 24/25 fodder budget as a ‘must do’, not an optional extra. It’s worth a bit of time now to ensure you can make it through the winter comfortably, without watching performance tail off.”

CEA as a Technology Proving Ground with LettUs Grow

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

As part of our “Back to the Future” project, we’re asking Agri-TechE members to reflect on how the agri-tech industry has evolved over the past decade and to share their vision for the next ten years. By compiling these insights, we aim to create a powerful outlook on the future of agriculture, a compelling call to arms for the industry driven by the diverse perspectives of our community.

This submission is part of the collection of reflections and predictions from our members, offering unique perspectives on the industry’s past milestones and future directions. Each contribution adds to a broader dialogue about the innovations and challenges that will shape the next decade in agri-tech.

 

Introduction to Jack Farmer & LettUs Grow

Jack is a plant scientist and specialist in aeroponic irrigation systems and their application within controlled environment agriculture (CEA). He co-founded LettUs Grow alongside Ben & Charlie back in 2015 to contribute to the development of controlled environment horticulture and their vision for a sustainable food system for people and planet.

LettUs Grow is an innovative agricultural technology provider based in Bristol, UK. They believe that careful innovation in farming can make the world a better place. LettUs Grow’s ultrasonic aeroponic irrigation systems allow growers to increase productivity & efficiency whilst minimising environmental impact.

Outside of the day-to-day Jack is passionate about the use of agriculture, ecology, and the circular economy to bring about a more sustainable future. He is always looking to promote cross-industry collaborations based on sound science, climate impact and evidence.

What do you think is the game-changing tech development we’ve seen in the last 10 years?

The first thing to state regarding the CEA industry is that it’s a remarkably innovative and strong performer in terms of productivity and financial performance within wider agriculture: operating with minimal subsidy within a UK context. The majority of tech development within the sector is by design around chasing incremental performance improvements – the 5 – 20% increases in yield, quality and/or growth rate that together lead to significantly higher yields overall. This is true across high-tech glasshouse and vertical farming, alongside to an appropriate extent across medium-tech vented polytunnels.

Beyond our innovations in the root zone, alongside peers such as Molear, I would give a shout out to tech companies such as Vivent, 2Grow and Gardin in bringing cost effective biometric sensors to the industry that allow us growers and plant scientists to evaluate crop behaviour and productivity in real-time, rather than waiting harvest to harvest. This is genuinely useful tech and rapidly reduces the time required to take crop steering decisions – empowering a grower to deploy their expertise over a wider area with less (but still many) crop walks.

What’s the biggest challenge to widespread adoption?

Technology adoption in our industry is by its very nature, slow, as almost everything new and useful has hardware involved. Growers have been sold yield-boosting promises since the dawn of time, so naturally most have to trial a technology before major adoption, which slows down progress. This means that all agritech startups need to keep their costs low, minimise overheads and find the fastest, cheapest path to getting their actually novel tech into grower hands – likely by outsourcing manufacture to an existing incumbent.

Lastly, being a tough (low margin) business, there isn’t a massive slush fund for most growers to spend on R&D and/or tech. Hopefully this will be addressed in the future with more government funds being directed to growers to trial technology and validate its performance. There is really good pathways for funding (public and private) technologies to commercial readiness, now we need to see actual state funding for UK growers to trial them – if the tech work this will validate mass adoption, improved performance, and advance the competitiveness of our whole UK industry.

What do you think is the most exciting thing we’ll see in 10 years’ time?

Whilst so far this has focused on plant-level technologies that improve productivity, the genuinely disruptive technology that seems ready to come down the track in the next decade is most likely semi-autonomous robotics entering the CEA growing operation – matching the existing expertise in packhouse automation. Once these machines are in operation and becoming competitive with seasonal labour then this dramatically reduces the exposure of the industry to the vagaries of the international labour market.

As with all new technology, growers will need to keep a very keen eye on keeping many competitors in the market to prevent any provider forming a monopoly – particularly if the government uses these innovations as an excuse to minimise seasonal labour visas. Leasing of robots also could prove a useful model (particularly for the startups) but may expose growers to longer term price inflation, versus the high CapEx of robot acquisition once the tech is mature enough. It will be very interesting to see how this plays out!

Labour Party Conference debates agri-innovation

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

“This is a time of transition… and it’s time for a values-based discussion with society about the role of innovation in agriculture.”  

So said Richard Harrison, Managing Director of the Plant Sciences Group (Wageningen University and Research), at a session at the Labour Party Conference in Liverpool on “Plant-based innovation and economic growth.”  

Moderated by Belinda Clarke of Agri-TechE , the session also featured Prof Mario Caccamo, CEO of Niab, and Tom Bradshaw, NFU President.  

Tom, heroically arriving slightly damp (it was a VERY wet day in Liverpool), agreed with the need to bring societal views into the conversation and also emphasised the farmer demand for a “systems” approach to R&D for the industry.  

“We are looking to transformational R&D to impact farm-level productivity”, he argued “this kind of ‘systems thinking’ is very, very difficult, but critically important.” 

Tom Bradshaw (President NFU), Belinda Clarke OBE (Director of Agri-TechE ), Richard Harrison (Managing Director of the Plant Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research), Mario Caccamo, (CEO Niab)

High expectations 

As an industry – and indeed wider society – we are asking a lot of plants of the future.  

We depend on them for food, feed, fuel, fibre, pharmaceuticals, and increasingly delivering on the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (zero hunger, good health and well-being, responsible production and consumption, climate action and life on land).  

And now the tools exist to maximise the potential of plants like never before. From new breeding techniques to an understanding of how plants interact with microbes and each other, the impact on agricultural rotations, harnessing plants as biofactories make novel, valuable products and using them to deliver “ecosystem services” such as carbon sequestration, clean water and flood mitigation.  

Co-creation, fragmentation and spending wisely 

Like many other sectors in the UK, the ability to generate innovative new ideas and undertake early-stage innovation (so-called “value creation”) is world-leading. 

It’s the “value capture” – harnessing this value for economic growth that has proved so much more challenging.  

The discussion ranged from the apparently fragmented role of the UK R&D landscape, (as compared with that in the Netherlands), to the need to use existing investment as wisely as possible, reducing duplication and ensuring “co-creation” of research between farmers and innovators. There will, the panel argued, need to be a new relationship between public and private investment to address all the challenges.  

In it for the long-term 

The message was one of optimism from both the panel and the audience. There was agreement in the need for A Plan with long-term clarity around a shared vision, which will also help drive global investment into the UK.  

It’s clear some change is needed to the structure of the R&D funding landscape to deliver even more value and the regulatory environment needs to provide the enabling environment for the innovations to grow and gain commercial traction.  

And crucially, to align with other plans – around the environment and nature recovery, the transition to net zero, the economic growth of the UK, and to ensure the wealth of expertise and capability acts as a jigsaw – an inter-locking innovation ecosystem, rather than a collection of fragmented and competing entities. 

Arguably there is no better time to feed in expert thinking to a new government than at their Party Conference and when they are nearly three months into their leadership.  

Let’s hope they were listening.  

IMG_1571
Britain's Labour Party annual conference in Liverpool
British Labour Party leader Keir Starmer speaks at the Britain's Labour Party annual conference in Liverpool, Britain, September 27, 2022. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

Sessions from the day, and PM Kier Starmer speech (courtesy Reuters Institute Digital News Report)

Shaping the Future of Farming with Yagro Ltd

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

As part of our “Back to the Future” project, we’re asking Agri-TechE members to reflect on how the agri-tech industry has evolved over the past decade and to share their vision for the next ten years. By compiling these insights, we aim to create a powerful outlook on the future of agriculture, a compelling call to arms for the industry driven by the diverse perspectives of our community.

This submission is part of the collection of reflections and predictions from our members, offering unique perspectives on the industry’s past milestones and future directions. Each contribution adds to a broader dialogue about the innovations and challenges that will shape the next decade in agri-tech.

 

 

Leveraging AI for Next Generation Data Analysis & Insights

Modern agriculture, powered by cutting-edge hardware and innovative software, has reshaped the way farmers make decisions and manage resources. Data, technology and innovation are key to transforming our agri-food systems to meet today’s goals of increasing production while reducing environmental impact and maintaining profitability.

The shift towards digital solutions marks a significant leap forward, though it is not purely about adopting new technologies. It’s also about harnessing the value of pre-existing data to make farming more sustainable and efficient.

But herein lies the challenge: how do you manage the exponential growth in the complexity and volume of data?

Luckily, agriculture is not answering this question alone. The world is awash in data, causing a seismic shift in virtually every industry.

In this context, the most game-changing technology over the past 10 years has been the emergence of accessible AI. Sparked by the release of ChatGPT towards the end of 2022, we’re experiencing a pivotal moment where AI can improve efficiency and productivity on an unprecedented scale. Truly a transformative moment of innovation.

This article explores how combining the potential of AI with the present value of advanced farm data analytics is not just theoretical but increasingly practical, offering new ways to enhance farm management and decision-making.

 

The Evolution of AI

In recent years, AI and related technologies (such as machine learning) have made remarkable progress, triggering waves of innovation and disruption. Examples include Large Language Models (voice assistants like Siri and Alexa), autonomous vehicles and generative AI. In agriculture, there are already implications for precision farming, robotics and farm management software.

Artificial Intelligence is becoming increasingly mainstream, used by companies of all sizes and for everyday tasks.

Although, despite the immense potential, widespread adoption has been hampered by challenges such as cost, complexity, trust and the quality of data required. AI has long been deemed difficult and distant. High initial costs, coupled with steep learning curves and the need for high-quality data to train AI models effectively, were perceived as some of the main challenges. These are now diminishing.

Our industry requires solutions that not only capture and process data, but also understand and adapt to the specifics of agricultural data: variability in breadth and depth, seasonality, geographical context and sensitivity to environmental factors.

YAGRO is taking the lead on data quality and accessibility. Our Data Ingestion Engine is designed to clean, verify and organise farm data from a wide range of sources and types. This not only empowers farmers with more accurate insights, but also has the capacity to provide a rich learning environment for AI algorithms to create new opportunities.

 

The Future of Farm Data

AI opens up many possibilities in agriculture, building upon advancements in data collection and analysis to enable accurate, real-time decision-making in the field.

Advanced farm data analytics is already providing farmers with the insights they need to succeed in an increasingly digital landscape. Tools like YAGRO’s Tracker transform farm records into actionable insights by providing clean and accurate analysis around in-season spending, helping farmers protect their Gross Margin and associate costs with each decision. Essential components of accurate farm benchmarking.

The power of AI will further improve data analysis and revolutionise the way farmers interact with their data.

Imagine a future where conversing with your data becomes second nature. Conversational AI is one of the most exciting practical prospects for agriculture: the potential for farmers to talk with their data… interacting with their datasets, asking questions, and receiving real-time insights.

Imagine asking “What impact is my nutritional strategy having on this field?” and instantly receiving a response detailing the previous application dates and rates, plus historical data around previous yields, offtake, etc…

This capability promises to transform decision-making processes, empowering farmers with unprecedented levels of knowledge and control in the field – Instantly.

This may seem like fairytale today, something that should be made to be believed. But with the exponential curve of technology, it’s likely this future isn’t too far away.

 

Conclusion

The next decade will see AI, farm data, and accessible advanced analytics come together to redefine agricultural productivity, sustainability and profitability.

YAGRO is at the forefront of this innovation, shaping data-driven solutions to thrive in the agricultural landscape of today and tomorrow.

Gene Editing and EU Regulations – a patent attorney’s perspective

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Ten years ago gene editing plants was far from commonplace – indeed, the first CRISPR edited mammalian cells had only just been achieved. Fast-forward ten years and a search for gene edited crops lists numerous successful trials, from GABA-enriched tomatoes for better sleep to disease resistant risotto rice. The possibilities for gene editing to transform agriculture, initially at least, seemed limitless.

As a partner at a European intellectual property (IP) firm, and head of the Agritech Biotech practice, I’ve been closely following the ongoing developments regarding gene-edited plants and crops in the European Union. There’s been considerable confusion and misinformation circulating about the legal status of these innovations. In the following article I will clarify the current situation and discuss potential future changes.

A patent attorney’s perspective: by Andrea Williams, Partner at Marks & Clerk

Tomato unsplash
risotto rice Unsplash

Contrary to popular belief, gene-edited plants are not banned or illegal in the European Union. However, they are currently classified as Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and subject to the same stringent regulatory framework. This classification stems from a 2018 European Court of Justice ruling, which determined that organisms obtained by new mutagenesis techniques should fall under the GMO Directive.

While this doesn’t constitute an outright ban, it can present significant hurdles for bringing gene-edited crops to market in the EU. The regulatory approval process for GMOs is exceptionally rigorous, involving extensive risk assessments and safety evaluations. As a result, only a handful of GMO crops have been approved for cultivation in the EU to date.

Regulatory hurdles aside, it is crucial to understand that – at the moment – companies can still obtain patent protection for their gene-editing innovations in Europe. Put simply, the issue lies not in intellectual property protection, but in the ability to commercialise these products due to the regulatory landscape.

Encouragingly, the European Commission has recently put forward a proposal to relax the regulatory approval process for certain gene-edited plants. This proposal aims to create a more favourable environment for innovation in agricultural biotechnology while maintaining safety standards.

However, and to the surprise of many of us in the intellectual property field, the European Parliament, while agreeing to relaxing the regulatory process, suggested that there should, in addition, be a ban on patenting gene-edited plants. Unsurprisingly, this potential ban has sparked considerable debate within the intellectual property and particularly agritech start-up communities.

As a patent attorney, I have serious concerns about the implications of such a ban. While the intention may be to promote access and prevent monopolisation, it seems difficult to conceive how a ban would not ultimately stifle innovation and investment in this critical field.

Patents in particular play a crucial role in incentivising research and development, particularly in fields like biotechnology that require a substantial upfront investment. In the context of gene-edited crops, a patent can protect groundbreaking innovations that have the potential to address global challenges such as food security, climate change adaptation, and sustainable agriculture. For example:

  1. Drought-resistant crops: Gene editing techniques could be used to develop plants with improved tolerance to water stress, helping farmers maintain yields in increasingly arid conditions.
  2. Pest-resistant varieties: By enhancing a plant’s natural immune responses, gene editing could reduce the need for chemical pesticides, benefiting both farmers and the environment.

Without patent protection, companies may be reluctant to invest in developing these crucial technologies, potentially slowing progress in addressing urgent agricultural challenges.

Rather than an outright ban on patents for gene-edited plants, a more nuanced approach could better serve the interests of innovation, farmers, and society at large. One potential solution is the expansion of the “breeder’s exemption” across all EU national patent laws.

The breeder’s exemption, which already exists in Plant Variety Rights (PVR) legislation, allows breeders to use protected varieties as starting material to develop new varieties without infringing on the rights of the PVR holder. Implementing a similar exemption in patent law could strike a balance between protecting innovators’ rights and ensuring access to genetic resources for further breeding and development.

As the debate over gene editing and patent protection continues in the EU, it’s essential to consider the long-term implications of any regulatory changes. While concerns about monopolisation and access are valid, we must be careful not to implement policies that could inadvertently hinder innovation in this critical field.

A thoughtful, balanced approach that protects intellectual property rights while promoting access and competition is crucial for fostering innovation in agricultural biotechnology. As patent attorneys, we have a responsibility to contribute our expertise to this ongoing dialogue and help shape policies that will drive progress in sustainable agriculture for years to come.

The future of AI in agriculture: the keynote address at REAP 2024

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

We are in the early stages of AI in agriculture. What should growers be thinking about as they plan for the future?

At REAP 2024 we will be considering where the optimum balance lies between “management of the many” and “optimisation of the one.”

Dr Elliott Grant
Dr Elliott Grant
Former CEO of Mineral

‘I think in 20 years we will look back and be incredulous that we used the same treatment across a whole field.’

Dr Grant, keynote speaker at Agri-TechE ’s REAP Conference on Wednesday 6th November 2024.

Mineral set out to apply the transformative power of AI to help make agriculture more sustainable and to increase its resilience to climate change.  The team developed tools to gather, organise, and analyse information about the plant world at a new level of precision and speed. Using millions of data points, they provided insights into the relationship between crop genetics, environmental impacts, and management practices on the farm.

Elliott argues that plant monitoring at high frequency, not just high resolution, will create additional knowledge that will unlock new paradigms in farming.

Mineral partnered closely with US-based Driscoll’s, the world’s leading berry company, to develop AI tools to improve crop phenotyping, better forecast yields, and optimise quality inspections.

Integrating hundreds of different data types like imagery, soils, weather, planting times, and historical yield is well-suited to the power of AI.  A key learning from these initiatives was the synergy between human expertise and machine intelligence. It was found that the careful combination of human intuition and raw AI power, with each learning from the other, gave the best results.

From this experience, Mineral developed a three-layered perception framework for agriculture: what can a machine see? (perception); what can a machine deduce from this information? (reasoning and decision-making); and how can the machine act on it? (action).

Elliott gives one example of a possible future scenario. Instead of a shed full of task-specific equipment, next-gen farms may have software-defined robots updated with new capabilities remotely. This would enable multi-functional machines, replacing the need for investment in specialised equipment each time the farmer wants to diversify.

“We’re at the cusp of a new era in agriculture,” Grant said. “With the help of AI, we can begin to build farms that are more resilient to climate change and more efficient in their use of resources. The future of farming is bright, and I’m excited to be a part of it.”

In addition to his keynote address, Grant will participate in a panel discussion on the future of agriculture and a farmer breakfast on the morning of 6th November.

To listen to Dr Grant in person and have the opportunity to ask him questions, book a ticket for REAP 2024.

Global agriculture has evolved into a dual landscape of both vast scale and intricate detail, and technologies are now available for the precise management of individuals within the field, herd or flock. But where is the tipping point in which the benefits from bespoke management of individual crops and livestock outweigh the broader, more general oversight of larger populations?

At REAP 2024, we’ll examine the practicality and return on investment of personalised care, the impact on yields and quality, and the implications for achieving net zero GHG emissions.

reapconference.co.uk

Increased funding for sustainable pulse crops in the UK

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

A consortium of four UK research organisations led by the John Innes Centre has won £3m Defra funding to enable the development of climate resilient legume crops.

The Pulse Crop Genetic Improvement Network (PCGIN) which started in 2008, has received the funding boost for the next five years.

The money will support PCGIN-affiliated researchers and its stakeholder network in delivering its mission: to provide improved breeding material for the cultivation of peas, beans and other pulses in the UK.

Pulse crops are an important alternative protein source, and their cultivation improves soils in rotation schemes, reducing the need for nitrogen fertilizer.

The research will address existing and new threats from pests and diseases, such as root rot in pea and bruchid beetle in faba bean. It will also target nutritional traits such as protein content, minerals and flavour components.

Professor Janneke Balk, group leader at the John Innes Centre and co-lead of PCGIN said: “Over the last 17 years PCGIN has made critical contributions to pea and faba bean development that are now close to being brought to market. In the new funding phase, we will expand our research to lentil and common bean, which could be grown more widely in the future as we see higher temperatures in the UK.”

PCGIN, led by the John Innes Centre, is in collaboration with the University of Reading, Niab in Cambridge, the Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS) at Aberystwyth University, and PGRO, the Processors and Growers Research Organisation, Peterborough.

The consortium will also look at future climate impacts on UK pulse crops using models from the Met Office. In addition to conventional genetic improvement, gene editing methods will be developed for pea and faba bean.

Dr Sanu Arora, group leader at the John Innes Centre and co-lead of PCGIN, said: “The next five years are key for developing new pulse crops for the UK. We need to work closely with farmers and growers to ensure that our research is targeting the traits that they need in their fields.”

Climate change poses an enormous threat to agriculture, both in the UK and around the world. Legumes, including peas, beans and lentils have a major environmental benefit because they can harvest, or fix, nitrogen from the air with the help of symbiotic bacteria in the soil. This means that they can be grown without the need for inorganic sources of nitrogen, in the form of fertilisers, which have a damaging impact on biodiversity and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions.

Nearly half of the protein in the human diet comes from plants, mostly pulses. The protein composition is different from animal protein, and less ideal for essential amino acids. Understanding the genetic basis of variation in protein enables breeding for better varieties with a more nutritious content, or properties suitable for plant-based alternatives of meat.

PCGIN will invest in gene-editing of pea and faba bean to accelerate genetic improvement and will develop new genetic resources. The latter includes resources to enable cultivation of lentils and Phaseolus (baked beans) in the UK and address questions such as: what types of genetic variation do we need to ensure resistance to local pests and diseases?

Dr Donal O’Sullivan, PCGIN collaborator at the University of Reading said: “This new phase of PCGIN comes at a critical juncture where we need to address the twin challenges of meeting growing demand for sustainably produced plant protein and at the same time mitigating the negative impacts of climate change.”

“Critically, it also enables the training of a new cohort of highly skilled pulse geneticists and brings together complementary skills and capabilities of the partners in a strong national network dedicated to maximizing the health and sustainability opportunities represented by our pulse crops.”

Dr Catherine Howarth, PCGIN collaborator at IBERS, said: “This is a fantastic opportunity to develop tools and genetic resources to enhance resilience to climate change in legumes such as peas and beans using the precision phenotyping platforms available at IBERS. These nitrogen fixing crops provide novel cropping options to enhance environmental sustainability and agrobiodiversity in the UK.”

 

PCGIN Fact File 

  • PCGIN 2024 – 2029 includes new objectives on climate change relevant to pulse crops in the UK and precision breeding (gene editing);
  • From its inception in 2008 until 2024 this PCGIN was led by Professor Claire Domoney, of the John Innes Centre.
  • PCGIN is managed by the John Innes Centre in collaboration with the University of Reading, Niab, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS) at Aberystwyth University and PGRO (Processors and Growers Research Organisation).

The John Innes Centre is an independent, international centre of excellence in plant science and microbiology.

Our mission is to generate knowledge of plants and microbes through innovative research, to train scientists for the future, to apply our knowledge of nature’s diversity to benefit agriculture, the environment, human health, and wellbeing, and engage with policy makers and the public.

To achieve these goals we establish pioneering long-term research objectives in plant and microbial science, with a focus on genetics. These objectives include promoting the translation of research through partnerships to develop improved crops and to make new products from microbes and plants for human health and other applications. We also create new approaches, technologies and resources that enable research advances and help industry to make new products. The knowledge, resources and trained researchers we generate help global societies address important challenges including providing sufficient and affordable food, making new products for human health and industrial applications, and developing sustainable bio-based manufacturing.

This provides a fertile environment for training the next generation of plant and microbial scientists, many of whom go on to careers in industry and academia, around the world.

The John Innes Centre is strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), and is supported by the John Innes Foundation through provision of research accommodation, capital funding and long-term support of the Rotation PhD programme.

For more information about the John Innes Centre visit our website www.jic.ac.uk

 

About LMU Munich

As one of Europe’s leading research universities, LMU Munich is committed to the highest international standards of excellence in research and teaching. Building on its more than 500-year-tradition of scholarship, LMU covers a broad spectrum of disciplines, ranging from the humanities and cultural studies through law, economics and social studies to medicine and the sciences. 18 percent of LMU‘s 50,000 students come from abroad, originating from 130 countries worldwide. The know-how and creativity of LMU’s academics form the foundation of the University’s outstanding research record. This is also reflected in LMU‘s designation as a “university of excellence” in the context of the nationwide Excellence Strategy to promote top-level university research. www.lmu.de/en

 

About Leiden University

Leiden University is an international research university that provides excellent research and teaching in the arts, the humanities, medicine and the social, natural and life sciences. It has a staff of 5,500 and a student population of over 30,000.

Leiden University
Our research

 

About BBSRC

The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) is part of UK Research and Innovation, a non-departmental public body funded by a grant-in-aid from the UK government.

BBSRC invests in world-class bioscience research and training on behalf of the UK public. Our aim is to further scientific knowledge, to promote economic growth, wealth and job creation and to improve quality of life in the UK and beyond.

Funded by government, BBSRC invested £498 million in world-class bioscience in 2017-18. We support research and training in universities and strategically funded institutes. BBSRC research and the people we fund are helping society to meet major challenges, including food security, green energy and healthier, longer lives. Our investments underpin important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.

More information about UK Research and Innovation.
More information about BBSRC, our science and our impact.
More information about BBSRC strategically funded institutes.

Future-ready agriculture: embracing bio-stimulants

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

As part of our “Back to the Future” project, we’re asking Agri-TechE members to reflect on how the agri-tech industry has evolved over the past decade and to share their vision for the next ten years. By compiling these insights, we aim to create a powerful outlook on the future of agriculture, a compelling call to arms for the industry driven by the diverse perspectives of our community.

This submission is part of the collection of reflections and predictions from our members, offering unique perspectives on the industry’s past milestones and future directions. Each contribution adds to a broader dialogue about the innovations and challenges that will shape the next decade in agri-tech.

The future of growing

Why should it matter

To solve our climate challenge and protect nature over the coming 10 years and beyond we must embrace, transform and accelerate innovation in agriculture. As one of the largest greenhouse gas emitting sectors of the global economy, efforts to embrace bio-stimulant technology and solutions in our global food systems need to be at the heart of change.

 

How can we make a difference

To reach these goals, industry’s R&D programs must close the technology gap in agriculture, with new technologies and methods of producing food which protect nature.

The bio stimulants industry today has technology and solutions that can deliver improved quality, yield and return on investment for growers around the world. However, is it fully ready to meet the challenges of the next 10 years?

Embracing bio-stimulants

If we are to meet the challenges of Climate Change by reducing the impact of abiotic stress on crops plus reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the next 10 years, then the bio stimulant industry must work more cohesively to move their technologies in that direction.

Alongside this change, the grower’s mindset also needs to embrace advancements in bio stimulant technology, as an essential part of their crop program. In Europe today only 38% of growers embrace bio stimulant technology.

Overcoming abiotic stress

New bio stimulant technologies for the future will deliver the reductions in abiotic stress and assist in reducing environmental impact.

However, as a trade-off growers may have to accept that bio stimulants alone may not be able to continue to deliver increases in crop yield but will deliver improved crop resilience and quality delivered through enhanced abiotic resistance to drought, flood, cold and heat.

Yield enhancements will come more from the domain of plant breeding and genetics.

Here is an example of resilience to extreme heat stress, leading to an increase in marketable crop using a foliar bio stimulant called Crop+ from Verdesian Life Sciences.

 

The example above is an extract from a bio stimulants presentation about demand, growth and challenges.

Agricultural challenges

At present some 30% of bio-stimulants used globally contain amino acids and microbials. Amino acid sources are marine, animal and vegetables.

Importantly, amino acids and microbials can modulate gene expression and induce metabolic changes in treated crops.

The complex carbohydrate compounds found in these technologies are the possible future for delivering the changes growers need.

However, the bio stimulant industry needs to overcome certain obstacles which currently exist in the supply chain around the sources of amino acids, particularly from the animal and marine sector and amongst industry regulators in assessment and expansion of microbials within agriculture.

Lobbying on behalf of the industry is being conducted today primarily by members of the European Bio stimulant Industry Council (EBIC).

Closing the gap

The food retail sector of the supply chain is also the key to overcoming this sustainable farming obstacle as they are the gateway and controller to the consumer.

This gives them the power to influence the grower in a sustainability and environmental direction.

To help close the current technology gap and deliver the technology needed in the coming 10 years, the bio stimulant industry needs to create more awareness and educate the food retailers.

It is important that retailers align their policies to the growers, encouraging them to embrace bio stimulant technologies of the future. Industry platforms like Agri-TechE could play an important role in this regard.

Grower adoption

The bio stimulant industry will play its part in the coming decade alongside regulators and the food industry, but the question remains; ‘will growers fully embrace the technology advancement needed in the coming 10 years to reduce effects of climate change and environmental impact?’

Only if collectively, we can clearly demonstrate that the additional cost of adding these technologies to grower’s crop programs will provide a clear return on investment and will not be seen as a climate change tax.

That is the challenge for the industry in the coming decade.

 

Enhancing water management in agriculture for sustainable growth

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Irrigated agriculture accounts for around 70% of global water use, however, an estimated 60% of irrigated cropland remains highly water-stressed.

In the face of escalating climate change, water scarcity and the pressing need for sustainable agricultural practices, improving water management in agriculture has become a critical priority.

Effective water management practices that can both optimise water use and enhance soil health are absolutely essential if the agricultural sector is to transition to a more sustainable method of farming and food production.

A new book – Improving water management in agriculture: Irrigation and food production – highlights key areas where innovation is required to ensure that water use is optimised and better managed by farmers and other key stakeholders across the agri-food supply chain.

“We cannot continue to produce and consume food in the same way that we have done in the past,” says Professor Jerry W. Knox from Cranfield University, UK and editor of this new book.

“Reconciling the water needs for food, the environment, energy and society remains a significant but surmountable challenge, as well as an opportunity for change,” he adds.

Much alike many other sub-sectors of agriculture, modern water management has been revolutionised by the advent of technology, with farmers and growers now opting to invest in precision irrigation technologies to improve the productivity, profitability and sustainability of their farms.

Technologies such as variable rate irrigation systems and remote sensing platforms can be used by farmers to apply water more efficiently, which in turn reduces waste and environmental impact.

However, whilst innovations in irrigation systems are important, innovations in drainage design and management are equally as important, particularly in regions prone to waterlogging and soil salinity.

“Around 14% of the arable and permanently cropped area worldwide are irrigated,” says Dr Henk Ritzema, former Associate Professor at Wageningen University, The Netherlands and contributor to this new book.

“However, despite the importance of drainage as a component of agricultural water management, only about 22% of these irrigated lands are drained,” he adds.

So, why is drainage seemingly overlooked?

For Professor Ritzema, it’s the positioning of drainage at the end of the pipeline:

“Drainage systems clean up the ‘mess’ other activities leave behind, like salts brought in by irrigation water and residues of fertilisers and pesticides.”

Drainage is largely forgotten about – people don’t like to talk about it. However, if water use in agriculture is to be truly optimised, modern drainage systems must undergo a series of improvements which target increased control, reduced environmental impact, reuse of drainage water and safe disposal of the drainage effluent.

“The book does exceptionally well in linking the myriad of issues which are relevant to agricultural water management,” says Professor Elías Fereres, University of Cordoba and IAS-CSIC, Spain.

“In doing this, the editor and the book’s contributing authors have presented an excellent state of the art analysis of irrigation and food production on an international level,” he adds.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Students drive innovation and add value to businesses

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

Exam results have been filtering in across the summer, and as the nation’s learners (and those supporting them) prepare for their next steps in academia or the world of work, we’ve been thinking about the role of students in the agri-tech innovation ecosystem.

Notwithstanding the current political debate about the relative value of different degrees and the role of apprenticeships, this month we are arguing for the value of students as vital contributors to the engine of progress.

From internships to collaborative R&D, bringing fresh thinking and team projects to businesses, it’s time to reframe the conversation to recognise that hosting students creates value, as well as providing learning. Being a student is about so much more than gaining new knowledge, the need to ensure learners are fit for the workplace of today (and tomorrow) has never been more important.

Happily, there are a wealth of programmes designed to help them deliver significant value to businesses as well as help individuals gain that all-important ‘experience’ of the sector.

Of course, Agri-TechE ’s Early Career Innovators’ Forum exists to  help those setting out in the industry to gain experience and build their network, but other more structured programmes exist to help businesses access this expertise. Dr Laura Bouvet, Agri-TechE ’s Knowledge Exchange Manager has written an article highlighting her experience as a student working with industry and how it benefitted both.

Group_IMG_20231120_152258

Post graduate students funded by BBSRC participate in a PIPS programme (Professional Internships for PhD Students) – a three-month placement in an external organisation. While badged as a learning experience for the student, the opportunity to harness a trained pair of hands and a finely tuned brain shouldn’t be under-estimated.

Similarly, a number of post-graduate courses – such as MBAs at many universities – require the students to undertake a team project applying their learning to address a real-world challenge. So, if you need a piece of desk research carrying out, they can be called upon to provide capacity and capability within your organisation and be specifically tasked with a project pertinent to your strategy.

Need to understand more about your competitors? Get your student team on the phone, searching the web and writing you a report about the current state of the art.

Looking to tackle a new international market? You have a team ready to help do your desk research about potential routes to success.

Wanting some insights into the trends in investment, technology or market forces? They stand ready to help.

So, it’s time to reframe the conversation that you aren’t just offering a learning opportunity – you can gain significant value from engaging with those poised to enter the industry. And you may just find your next employee……

Are we missing a trick?

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

The future agri-tech workforce is ready and waiting…

Laura Bouvet, Knowledge Exchange Manager at Agri-TechE describes her career path and the benefits she received – and offered – through industry work experience.

Postgraduate studies traditionally focused on training researchers to do research and work in Academia. But with only a small proportion of students continuing in the sector, the landscape has changed significantly in the last decade.

There is now a larger focus on providing students with skills and experience to go on to work in Industry as part of Doctoral Training Partnerships, for example. These offer students the opportunity (and the money through a continuous stipend) to gain work experience in a different field and environment through Professional Internship for Postgraduate Students (PIPS).

And that’s what attracted me to my PhD.

Laura Bouvet

Back in 2016, I was enrolled on the Cambridge Biosciences BBSRC Doctoral Training Programme (I know, it’s a mouthful!) and was looking for an organisation to do my three months’ PIPS.

I set out for CIMMYT, the International Research centre for Maize and Wheat in Mexico, as I had a fascination for their seed conservation work (and have family from there!). There, I mapped out pilot online training modules in genetics and genomics for scientists. These would complement in-person training, so that more scientists could access and make use of the wealth of genetic data available from CIMMYT’s maize seed bank.

5979294226_af07140158_o
FB_IMG_1725540820929
Laura Bouvet

How can it benefit your organisation?

Early-careers researchers, whether Masters, PhD or postdocs represent an untapped pool of skills and experience for innovation in agriculture.

For many organisations, PIPS and other types of student/researcher placements can be a good door opener to knowledgeable and motivated individuals to support ongoing projects, to help complete timely activities or kick off a new collaboration.

At Agri-TechE , we have benefitted from the research skills that Erica Hawkins a postdoctoral researcher at the John Innes Centre. Erica was brought in to work on a digital transformation project with the UEA in 2022.

Across the three research councils that fund Doctoral Training relevant to agriculture and agri-tech (BBSRC, EPSRC, NERC), organisations can benefit from a wide array of technical skills, from computer science to plant science, data science, engineering and animal science – to name a few!

But researchers’ skills extend beyond their topical area of expertise. During my PhD, I was also:

  • Project manager
  • Trials coordinator
  • Data scientist
  • Communicator

These are all transferable skills that I brought to CIMMYT. Skills that most postgraduate researchers will have and that organisations can benefit from. With the added bonus of a fresh perspective and bucket loads of youthful motivation!

Whatever your area of expertise, it’s likely that you’ll benefit from a fresh and different perspective, and who knows, maybe even your next recruit.

I found my way to my PIPS host, maybe it’s time for you to explore the benefits of being one?

Here you can find further information about the different types of postgraduate student placements and how they can benefit you. If you have any projects in mind, please contact us so that we can put you in touch with suitable universities.

Improved version of ‘Robocrop’ only picks ripe raspberries

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

A new version of the world’s first raspberry-picking robot, a four-armed machine powered by artificial intelligence and able to do the job at the speed and effectiveness of a human, is to be employed on farms in the UK, Australia and Portugal over the coming 12 months.

Read the full article here, on The Guardian website.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.