AgFunder releases Global AgriFoodTech Investment Report 2026

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

“Bottomed out but not rebounding” is the simplest way to describe the global agri-foodtech investment landscape in 2025, according to the latest report by AgFunder.

The eagerly-waited “barometer” of investor confidence was released last week at the World Agri-Tech Innovation Summit in San Francisco and while it reveals largely flat levels of investment ($16.2bn as compared with $16.7bn the previous year), new trends and behaviours are emerging.

 

Image Credit: AgFunder Global AgriFoodTech Investment Report 2026

 

Bio-based and farm management leading the “upstream” pack

The Agfunder analysis distinguished between “upstream” deals and technologies (pre-farm gate) and “downstream” (such as e-grocery and retail).

In the upstream category, companies developing solutions in bioenergy and biomaterials proved most attractive to investors globally, followed by agbiotech and farm management, sensing and “internet of things.” It will be interesting to see how this changes next year with the current geopolitical instability impacting fuel and fertiliser prices.

 

The UK – holding the line….. just!

In 2025, UK companies raised a collective $685M across 111 deals, representing a modest increase on the previous year. The UK is now sitting 5th in the global ranking, just below the Netherlands, with China and India taking 3rd and 2nd places respectively. Top spot, unsurprisingly, goes to the US which, despite leading the pack, is still down 8%.

The Netherlands reported a massive 44% increase in investment, taking it to 4th place and ahead of the UK by a nose.

There is a health warning to the data for the UK, however, that it most likely doesn’t include the recent hot-of-the-press news about the massive raises by Tropic Biosciences of $105M and Resurrect Bio which secured $8.1M in its recent Series A round. Impressive performance indeed which is likely to make the 2026 data look healthier. A salutary reminder that, as in the case of the Netherlands, one major deal can significantly influence the rankings.

 

Image Credit: AgFunder Global AgriFoodTech Investment Report 2026

 

The Rise of Africa, Debt Financing and New Entrants

Despite the global appetite being cautious and focussing on clear paths to revenue and real unit economics, the entrepreneur’s optimism is still palpable with new companies continuing to emerge. For the first time since records began, the proportion of investment into “first-time funded” companies has increased – to 46% of the total global investment (an increase of around 6% on the past two, stagnant, years).

Also on the up is investment into African companies, with an increase of 30% to $260M across 90 deals. The biggest categories are Agmarket places and fintech, as well as home cooking.

Debt financing is also on the up compared with previous years, with around 18% of total investment coming from debt. This is more than double the proportion since records began, posing some interesting questions about the role of banks and providers of debt finance in leveraging different behaviours and incentives.

 

Future opportunities for the UK?

It’s hard to compete with the scale of India and China and the depth of capital in the US. Innovations targeted at mass markets are going to be hard to secure compared with those emerging from these behemoths. Specialised, high value innovation such as agbiotech harnessing genetic and molecular based solutions, as well as robotics and automation remain among the UK’s USPs.

Agri-Tech for Resilience, Innovation and Sustainable Ecosystems

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

Sometimes the world feels both very big and at the same time very small. Travel takes time and energy, but often, despite the distance, you discover like-minded people facing similar challenges and with huge commonalities and opportunities.

The last six months of the ARISE (Agri-Tech for Resilience, Innovation and Sustainable Ecosystems) project has seen representatives from seven countries visit agri-tech innovation ecosystems in Sao Paolo, St Louis and the UK, as part of a project supported by the British Government.

 

f98a5b21-2dc4-4e67-bbb5-2eb2481c4d9c
IMG_1773

All about ecosystems

Much has been written and discussed about the key features of functional so-called “innovation ecosystems.” These include strong research capabilities, lots of big and small businesses, a pool of talented people to recruit, access to finance (both public and private), an “enabling” regulatory environments and permissive fiscal and tax positions for businesses.

When it comes to agri-tech, you also need access to pro-innovation farmers, well-briefed advisors, as well as different cropping and livestock regimes, and a range of soil types.

The ARISE project was funded by the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology to help forge collaborative links between north and south American innovation ecosystems and the UK. These included Embrapa (Brazil), agcentre (Colombia), CREA and Universidad Austral (Argentina), AgroTech (Chile), Tecnológico de Monterrey (Mexico), as well as the Yield Lab LATAM based in Brazil, and the Yield Lab Institute in St Louis, Missouri.

The aim was to pump-prime fact-finding, brokering of collaborations and building partnerships.

Same, same…..but different

What has emerged from the project was how the different strengths of the ecosystems fit together. South America has scale and diverse production systems. By contrast the St Louis ecosystem feeds into a wider community across north America with more capital and market pull. And the UK is known for value creation through world-leading research and innovation. All have their challenges which can potentially be overcome through partnerships with each other.

 

IMG_1798
Knowledge Hub size images (18)

It’s all about the people

As if it needed any reinforcement, advancing the body of knowledge and practical application on farm is critically dependent on people. The closing Innovation Summit saw the wider UK agri-tech community join the international delegation – with over 80 partnering meetings held.

BBSRC and the Department for Business and Trade were on hand to speak about the UK government’s international activities, while Cambridge Econometrics AgriTierra and Earthbase showcased innovative methodologies for assessing ecosystems and the potential of the companies within them for future success.

Keeping it real and grounded, Richard Meredith, Head of Dyson Farming Research talked about the innovative approaches the UK’s largest farming company is taking around technology adoption and increasing the productivity and sustainability of agriculture.

These included:

  • Find your USP and leverage it – stand out from the crowd
  • Understand your market and your role within it
  • To really make a difference, you need the right people in the room, each with something to offer and a matching need.

Thank you to all the ARISE delegates and host organisations and all the attendees of the Summit.

 

 

Global Weather, Grain Markets & Nitrogen

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

While much of the agronomic conversations are focused on upcoming fungicide and spray programmes, the market outlook for wheat and fertiliser is just as important for shaping spring decisions. Here’s what’s driving the market and what it means for farm businesses in Spring 2026.

US Winter Wheat Under Significant Heat Stress

One of the biggest market movers right now comes from the US Plains, where winter wheat crops are battling heat and drought stress.

This includes:

  • Severely low soil moisture, particularly in Kansas – one of the largest US wheat‑producing states.
  • A forecast showing temperatures up to 15°C above normal, with some areas expected to hit 30°C next week.
  • Worsening crop condition scores across several major wheat states.

 

US heat map showing mean temperature anomalies
Figure 1. Example heat map of the US showing temperature anomalies between 21st and 22nd March 2026.

 

Why this matters:
Tighter US supply expectations tend to support global prices, especially for milling wheat. With US crops under pressure so early in the season, the market is on alert for further deterioration.

UK Wheat Imports Slow – Tightening Domestic Balance

Closer to home, the UK wheat balance sheet is showing signs of tightening:

  • Imports from July–January are down 443kt compared with last season.
  • Total wheat imports currently sit at 1.5 million tonnes.

A slower pace of arrivals generally supports domestic basis, particularly in regions dependent on imported milling wheat. If the trend continues into spring, UK buyers may need to stay more active in the market to secure coverage.

Fertiliser Markets: Post‑War Highs and Big Supply Disruptions

Fertiliser markets remain volatile, with several geopolitical and supply‑chain issues adding upward pressure:

  • Iran has destroyed 16 commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz in the first two weeks of the conflict, disrupting critical nitrogen transport routes.
  • Both energy and fertiliser markets are now trading at post‑war highs.
  • High nitrogen prices are already influencing planting choices:
    • US growers shifting towards soya
    • EU growers leaning to sunflowers or lower‑N alternatives

This shift reduces demand for N‑heavy crops and indirectly supports global grain prices.

A Rare Inverse in the Fertiliser Market

One notable trend is the extremely strong market inverse:

  • Spot prices are significantly higher than forward values
  • May–August forward nitrogen is currently ~30% cheaper than today’s spot

This suggests the market is pricing in a short‑term supply squeeze, driven by transport disruption rather than long‑term scarcity.

Practical takeaway:
Growers may benefit from flexible purchasing strategies this spring, particularly if cashflow is under pressure. But any delayed buying comes with the risk of short-term availability issues.

Regulation to Watch: UK CBAM Nitrogen Tax

The UK is considering its own version of CBAM from January 2027, which could further complicate the regulatory landscape and pricing structures. Still, the CBAM coming into effect in the EU from 2026 will have implications on the UK ahead of 2027. Early modelling suggests an uplift of £50–£70/t. This could incentivise greater use of urea, which is more nutrient-dense and may perform better under CBAM rules. You can read more about this new potential carbon cost here. 

What Should Farmers Be Thinking About Now?

Given the current climate, wheat and fertiliser markets will remain sensitive to:

  • US crop ratings over the next 4–6 weeks
  • Ongoing logistics disruption in the Middle East
  • UK import pace and domestic demand trends
  • Spring nitrogen buying behaviour
  • Regulatory pressure on fertiliser types and timings

For growers, this means staying flexible and well‑informed. Both grain and nitrogen markets look set for another turbulent season, but understanding the forces behind them can help keep decision‑making grounded.

More Information

If you would like to discuss these topics further, please do get in contact today.
  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Can farmers afford (not) to trial biological tools this season?

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

To trial or not to trial?

A practical case for using 2026 as a year to test, learn and build nutrient resilience

For much of the past few seasons, farmers have had to navigate input volatility as part of normal business. But 2026 feels slightly different.

Nitrogen remains closely tied to gas and energy markets. Synthetic phosphorus fertilisers are also under pressure, not only because of cost, but because phosphate supply depends on sulphur and fragile global trade routes. Oil continues to influence the wider cost base through diesel, transport, plastics and logistics.

This is not just a nitrogen story. It is also a phosphorus-efficiency story.

None of that is good news in itself. But it does create a useful moment for the industry.

Instead of viewing this season only as another risk to manage, perhaps it makes more sense to treat it as a year to test practical alternatives that may improve nutrient efficiency and reduce exposure to volatility.

From input buying to nutrient strategy

This is no longer just a fertiliser purchasing conversation. It is becoming a nutrient strategy conversation.

When conventional inputs become harder to predict, harder to justify and more exposed to global disruption, the question shifts. The focus moves away from “How do we buy the same programme more cheaply?” and towards

“How do we make every unit of nitrogen and phosphorus deliver more value?”

That is an important change in mindset.

Nitrogen often gets the most attention because the price risk appears quickly. But phosphorus deserves just as much focus. On many farms, the issue is not simply whether phosphorus is present. The issue is whether the crop can access enough of it when it matters.

On many farms, phosphorus is not missing. It is present, but not fully available to the crop.

That means the industry is dealing with two separate but connected questions at once: how to protect nitrogen efficiency, and how to improve phosphorus availability.

Why this season should be use proactively

In years like this, it is easy to become reactive. Growers watch markets, delay decisions, worry about replacement cost, and try to limit risk. That is understandable. But it may not be the best long-term response. A better response may be to use this season proactively. To test. To compare. To gather evidence under real farm conditions.

Not because biology is a silver bullet.
Not because one product will solve every nutrition problem.
But because side-by-side farm trials can answer practical commercial questions before the next season arrives.

The questions worth testing now

Can a biological tool help unlock more phosphorus that is already in the soil?
Can it improve nitrogen use efficiency?
Can it support crop response during stress?
Can it help reduce dependence on the most volatile parts of the input programme?

Those are worthwhile questions in any season. In 2026, they look especially relevant.

This is a good year to test, not panic.

The case for trials, not hype

Farmers do not need to “believe” in a category first. They need to test it properly. That means keeping comparisons simple, changing as few variables as possible, and measuring more than yield alone. Crop consistency, rooting, visible response, timing, fertiliser rate, and margin all matter.

This is where biological products become more than an interesting idea. They become a practical part of on-farm learning. And that may be the real opportunity this season offers.

If a farm can run a fair strip trial in 2026 and learn something useful about phosphorus availability, nitrogen response or nutrient cycling, that knowledge may prove more valuable than waiting another year and facing the same volatility with no new evidence.

A more positive way to frame the biological conversation

Too often, the conversation around biology swings between two extremes. Either it is oversold as the answer to everything, or dismissed too quickly because it does not replace conventional fertiliser overnight.

Neither view is especially helpful.

But what if this is the year to test whether biological tools can improve nutrient efficiency and reduce exposure to volatile inputs?

The goal is not to replace everything overnight. The goal is to test what works under real farm conditions.

That is a serious, measurable and commercially relevant question that encourages innovation without abandoning practical agronomy.

Most importantly, it shifts the conversation from opinion to evidence.

Why this matters for the industry

No one wants farmers to reach next season and say, “We could have tested that when we had the chance.”

That is why this message matters now.

Not because the industry should panic.
Not because farms should make dramatic changes overnight.
But because they have an opportunity to use this season well.

There are now more biological tools on the market that target real nutrient-efficiency problems: locked-up phosphorus, inconsistent nitrogen response, stress-related underperformance, and nutrient tie-up in residues. The right response is not to assume they all work. It is to identify the right farm problem, run a proper trial, and measure the outcome honestly. That is how progress happens.

The smart question for 2026

The smart question for 2026 is not, “Why biology?”

It is, “Why not test it properly now?”

If nitrogen and phosphorus are becoming more expensive, more fragile and more politically exposed, then this season may be the right time to trial tools that could help crops make better use of what is already in the system.

This is not a message of fear. It is a message of opportunity.

And for a farming industry that has had to adapt quickly more than once in recent years, that feels like the right message to take into the season ahead.

READ MORE HERE: https://bactotech.co.uk/can-farmers-afford-not-to-trial-biological-tools/

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Does Agri-Tech need Duolingo? Or even Trilingo?!

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

We’ve been hosting the ARISE delegation this week – researchers and innovation leads from Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Mexico and the USA – and their visit has been a timely reminder of something that sits quietly at the heart of agri‑tech adoption.

For all the focus on new tools, new data and new scientific insights, the real work is still translation. Not just the linguistic kind (although a few of us have been grateful for Google Translate this week), but the deeper kind that helps people from different parts of the sector actually understand one another.

Research, technology development and farming each come with their own assumptions and priorities. A researcher may start from a systems‑level perspective; a technologist may focus on scaling and optimisation; a grower may be thinking primarily about risk, labour and margins. None of these viewpoints are wrong, but they don’t automatically align.

Without translation, they simply talk past each other.

Vitor Mondo, Embrapa, Innovation Ecosystem Supervisor
ARISE delegation Cambridge March 2026

Are interdisciplinary skills “soft” skills, or are they key?

We often talk about “interdisciplinary skills” as if they’re a nice‑to‑have. In reality, they’re the glue that holds innovation together. The most effective people in our ecosystem are rarely the ones with the deepest technical expertise, they’re the ones who can listen to a farmer describe their problem in plain English (or Spanish, Portuguese, French..…), translate it into a technical brief, and then communicate the solution back into something that feels usable, affordable and trustworthy.

They’re also the ones who can articulate challenges on behalf of others – especially farmers and growers who don’t always have the time or platform to do it themselves.

It’s why ARISE matters. It’s why international exchange matters. Exposure to different systems forces you to articulate your own assumptions – and that’s the first step in becoming an effective agri-tech translator.

This week has offered plenty of those moments. Not the headline presentations, but the quieter points in discussion where someone asks, “When you say scalable, what do you actually mean?” or “In our system, that constraint doesn’t exist – but this one does.” These small clarifications shift the conversation. They make it possible for people from different backgrounds to understand one another well enough to work together.

As the ARISE visitors head home, what stays with me is not a particular technology or project, but the value of that translation work – linguistic and conceptual. It’s easy to overlook because it isn’t flashy, but it’s the thing that allows ideas to move between science, farming and technology in a way that leads to something practical.

And if agri‑tech is going to keep moving forward, we’ll need many more people who can do that. Which is exactly what we’re trying to nurture through the ARISE project, through the Early Career Innovators Forum, and through Agri‑TechE itself.


If you’re early in your career – in research, farming or any of the many professions that sit around them – and building those interdisciplinary, cross‑sector translation skills, the ECIF Conference next month is designed for you. Book here for Protecting Agriculture on the Digital Frontier – From Soil to Cloud.

Bridging the Gap Between Innovation & On-Farm Adoption

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Ag-Tech innovators are pushing boundaries like never before, but taking a promising idea from concept to commercial on-farm adoption isn’t simple. It requires robust evidence, credible trials, farmer‑facing communication, and clear pathways to scale.

To accelerate this journey, we are excited to launch a new three‑stage service package designed specifically for innovators who want independent validation, on‑farm proof, and real‑world impact: Define > Develop > Demonstrate. Together, these stages provide a clear and practical route from existing evidence through to confident market uptake.

Dr Alex Setchfield, Research & Knowledge Exchange Manager at Ceres Research, says: “We’re excited by the strength of innovation emerging in Ag‑Tech. The key now is helping translate that science and research into confident farm practice through independent evidence, practical fit, and trusted communication. Our Define > Develop > Demonstrate package brings those elements together to support robust validation, informed decision‑making, and credible routes to market.”

So, whether you’re refining early R&D or preparing for widespread market entry, our structured yet flexible approach is designed to support your next steps and help you move forward confidently.

1. DEFINE: Independent Insight to Strengthen Your Innovation

Every successful product journey starts with clarity. Our Define service provides an independent review of your existing R&D data, trial work, and wider scientific literature to uncover opportunities, limitations, and next steps.

We work with you to assess:

  • Data quality, robustness, and validity
  • Alignment with peer‑reviewed evidence
  • Potential for productivity, profitability, and resilience gains
  • Scalability across soil types, farming systems, and regions
  • Adoption barriers and routes to overcome them at scale

Where appropriate, we can also include optional site visits with our partners at Ceres Rural to evaluate practical suitability for real‑world farming conditions.

Deliverables:

A clear, actionable report highlighting opportunities to progress your innovation, either refining within Define, or moving ahead to Develop.

2. DEVELOP: Turning R&D Questions into Credible On‑Farm Trials

When you’re ready to test your innovation in real farming systems, our Develop stage provides the scientific rigour, agricultural relevance, and project management needed to generate trusted, defensible evidence.

This includes:

  • Full trial design and protocols tailored to your R&D or market-entry questions
  • Trial delivery through Ceres Rural and our laboratory connections
  • Crop assessments, sample collection, and ongoing trial monitoring
  • Detailed data analysis, including cost-benefit evaluation at farm level
  • Clear reporting with results, conclusions, and recommended next steps

Outputs can be tailored to your needs – traditional reports, slide decks, infographics, or publishable industry‑ready material.

Deliverables:

Trial design and delivery, ongoing management and an evidence-backed report showing whether to continue the Development stage, or progress to Demonstrate.

3. DEMONSTRATE: Showcasing Innovation to Drive Farmer Adoption

The final step is taking your innovation to the people who will use it. Demonstrate provides tailored knowledge‑exchange (KE) activities that place your product directly in front of farmers and growers, agronomists and industry partners.

This may include:

  • Participation in Ceres On The Farm Days
  • Access via Ceres Research Membership and Agronomy Club channels
  • Bespoke demonstration days and showcase events
  • Interactive digital briefs and podcasts
  • Peer‑to‑peer learning opportunities to accelerate uptakeWe also track impact through attendance metrics, geographic reach, testimonials, and reported adoption intentions.

Deliverables:

A bespoke mix of KE activities, an adoption roadmap, and clear reporting to demonstrate the value and traction of your innovation within its target market.

Why Choose Ceres Research

✔ Independent, science-led evaluation and validation
✔ Real‑world farm trial evidence designed for credibility and commercial readiness
✔ Direct engagement with progressive UK farmers, growers, and agronomists
✔ A structured route from concept to adoption

Whether you’re developing biological innovations, digital tools, machinery, soil and plant technologies, or data‑driven platforms, Define > Develop > Demonstrate gives you the clarity, evidence, and reach to accelerate your product’s journey to market.

Ready to Move Forward?

We’d love to talk about how our new service package can support your R&D or market-entry plans.

Get in touch with the Ceres Research team to begin your Define, Develop and Demonstrate journey today.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

GoMicro Deploys Second AI Quality Control Unit to Australian Leafy Greens Grower

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Adelaide-based agtech company continues to build its track record in automated produce inspection — and is looking for UK partners.

GoMicro, the Australian agtech company developing AI-powered quality assessment for fresh produce, has shipped and installed its second GM Exceed unit at a leafy greens operation in Victoria’s Gippsland region.

The deployment follows GoMicro’s first commercial installation at Boratto Farms in late 2025 — widely covered in trade media — and represents a significant step in proving the system’s repeatability. The unit was built in Adelaide, shipped directly to the grower, and is now being fine-tuned remotely by GoMicro’s engineering team in collaboration with the farm’s QC lead.

What the Technology Does

The GM Exceed is a compact, self-contained quality assessment system designed for leafy greens packhouses. It uses AI trained on sample images — good quality, poor quality, specific defect types — to detect issues such as yellowing, pest damage, disease, and white spotting in real time. The system produces instant PDF reports with quality and size metrics, giving growers objective data where previously they relied on subjective human judgement.

Critically, the unit is designed so that any farm hand can operate it — no specialist QC training required. It works offline, with internet connectivity used for remote support and sharing QC reports.

Why This Matters for UK Growers

The UK’s leafy greens sector faces many of the same pressures driving adoption in Australia: labour shortages in QC roles, subjective grading that creates disputes between growers and buyers, and increasing retailer demand for traceability and consistency. GoMicro’s system addresses all three, and the company is actively seeking UK partners and early adopters.

 

Sivam-Ready-to-Ship-768x768
Dr Sivam Krish, GoMicro CEO, preparing the second GM Exceed unit for dispatch from Adelaide
GoMicro-initial-setup-at-second-farm

How to Engage with GoMicro

GoMicro is interested in connecting with UK leafy greens growers, packhouse operators, and industry bodies who want to explore AI-assisted quality assessment. The company offers online demonstrations and is open to conversations about how the technology could fit different operations.

What to expect from an initial conversation: a 15–20 minute online demonstration of the GM Exceed system running on real produce, followed by a discussion about your operation’s specific QC challenges and volumes. There is no obligation — GoMicro is genuinely interested in understanding whether its technology fits the UK context before making any commitments.

 

Get in Touch

Kristie Dutt, Business Development Lead, Email: kristie@gomicro.ai; Web: www.gomicro.ai

Agri-TechE members are welcome to reach out directly.

 

About GoMicro

GoMicro is an Australian agricultural technology company based at Adelaide’s Tonsley Innovation District. Founded by Dr Sivam Krish, the company develops AI-powered quality assessment systems — branded Quality Intelligence — for fresh produce including leafy greens, berries, and other horticultural crops. GoMicro’s systems are designed for real-world packhouse environments, with a focus on simplicity, durability, and objective repeatability.

The Inevitability of AI Quality Control

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Stand in a spinach field at 6:30 in the morning, and you will see both the brilliance of modern agriculture — and its tension.

Spinach grows fast. Sometimes a 24-day cycle from seed to harvest. Harvest too early, and the yield suffers. Too late and leaves lose value. The harvest decision itself is already an act of quality control. Once the machine starts moving, people walk ahead of it scanning the ground for anything that doesn’t belong — irrigation fragments, plastic, rogue weeds. Behind them, hundreds of kilograms of leaves are cut per minute. Millions of dollars are spent on quality control to ensure supermarket specifications are met.

The system depends on human vision. And that dependence is beginning to strain, particularly with labour shortages. Spinach, more than most crops, exposes something the industry rarely articulates clearly.

 

Quality Is Not Absolute

Article content

Fresh produce is biological. It varies by nature. No two leaves are identical. No two harvests are identical. Quality is a human framework imposed on nature to facilitate trade.

Customers expect consistency and quality. But quality is not a scientific constant. It is a commercial boundary applied to biological variability. When supply is abundant, tolerances tighten. When supply is constrained, they relax. Specifications are negotiated against reality.

Two experienced inspectors can assess the same batch and differ slightly — both defensible. Quality Assessment in fresh produce is largely subjective. Buyers and sellers rely on this flexibility to keep markets functioning when nature’s supply is unpredictable.

But subjectivity comes at a cost. Without objective quality measurement, interpretation drives price — leading to disputes, unfair practices, and significant food waste that ultimately harms both growers and consumers.

Contrast this with the trade of minerals, where the key attributes of value are measured precisely and shared transparently. When measurement is objective, trade becomes clearer, fairer, and far more efficient.

Article content

In the context of absolute standards, trust becomes an essential ingredient but is quickly eroded through disputes. The expansion of verification, inspection process and documentation adds costs, time, energy and friction, but does not resolve the fundamental issues arising out of subjectivity. This subjectivity is a tax in the agri-food chain.

Precise, transparent, digitally shared assessment reduces that tax. When both sides see the same structured data, negotiation becomes calibrated (based on verifiable data) rather than positional. Disagreements shrink from subjective debate to measurable variation.

AI will replace QC with Assessment

Article content

Traditional QC is structured as a gate — often operated by the buyer who optimise from the purchasing side and bears little of the cost of rejections. This is possible only because of the subjectivity of current manual QC processes.

Buyers work primarily on binary decisions: accept or reject when supply is pentlify. The seller has to bear the cost of rejection, which often includes disposal costs and in many cases, the seller negotiates a markdown and in some cases, provides the goods without charge. In Australia, “19% of rejected produce was recorded as being given away for free after rejection.”

Current QC processes are too crude for biological systems, extracting a heavy price, with around one-third (34%) of Australian vegetable growers now considering leaving the industry, according to the AUSVEG Industry Sentiment Report.

When quality is measured precisely and early — at or near harvest — produce can be segmented intelligently. Premium leaves move to high-spec retail, while slightly lower grades flow to processing, food service, or local markets. Supermarkets themselves often flex their standards when supply is tight rather than leave shelves empty.

AI assessment can manage this flexibility fairly and transparently, matching supply and demand through measurable — yet adaptable — quality thresholds.

Instead of discovering mismatches late in the supply chain, where waste becomes unavoidable, segmentation can happen upstream, helping growers maximise the value of the labour and resources already invested. What agriculture needs is not more crude QC, but assessment.

Turning Inspection into Infrastructure

Article content

Historically, quality control in fresh produce has been mandated by buyers and applied before dispatch and again at receipt — often by two different inspectors relying on subjective judgment. Spoilage during transportation adds yet another layer of variability.

The result is predictable: disputes, rejected shipments, and waste.

AI assessment changes the economics of this process. AI’s tireless eyes can inspect every leaf, every fruit, every vegetable, enabling assessment at unprecedented scale and accuracy across the entire supply chain.

Quality can now be verified both at dispatch and at receipt using the same standards, dramatically reducing disputes. And through mutual agreement, these standards can flex when supply conditions require it — allowing markets to balance supply and demand without compromising transparency.

QC therefore, stops being a buyer-managed filter and becomes a shared quality verification infrastructure. AI creates a common operating layer through which supply, demand, tolerance, and pricing can be aligned transparently and fairly.

This shift is not speculative — it is inevitable. Systems that reduce transaction costs, improve profitability, and reduce waste are always adopted.

Originally posted in LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/inevitability-ai-quality-control-sivam-krish-ao7nc/

Dr Sivam Krish, GoMicro CEO, preparing the second GM Exceed unit for dispatch from Adelaide

 

Sivam Krish Reinventing Quality Control With AI | Founder, GoMicro | GenAI Pioneer & Keynote Speaker

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Foliar nitrogen fixing spray: what our first BactoStym Nitro results show

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

What we tested

We wanted to look at foliar nitrogen support in a clean and controlled way, so we set up a comparison in a nitrogen-free growth medium. One series received BactoStym Nitro. The second series received a market-leading foliar nitrogen-fixing benchmark. (We then sampled both series over time and asked an independent external laboratory to analyse the nitrogen profile.)

The goal was simple: remove added nitrogen from the system, then see how key nitrogen forms changed over time.

What the first results showed

  • The clearest signal came from ammonium nitrogen.

In the BactoStym Nitro series, ammonium nitrogen rose strongly through the test window, moving from 1.5 at T0 to 35.7 at T1, then to 60.9 at T2.

In the market-leading benchmark series, ammonium nitrogen stayed much lower, moving from 3.0 at T0 to 4.7 at T1, then falling to 0.6 at T2.

  • We also saw a difference in Kjeldahl nitrogen.

The benchmark series trended down from 223 at T0 to 118 at T2. By contrast, the BactoStym Nitro series rose overall from 129 at T0 to 170 at T2.

  • Meanwhile, nitrite nitrogen stayed below the lab quantification limit in both series throughout the test.

In simple terms, the lab comparison showed a much stronger ammonium nitrogen trend in the BactoStym Nitro series than in the benchmark series.

Why we think that matters

A lab is not a field, and we want to be clear about that.

However, this kind of controlled test still matters. Because the growth medium contained no added nitrogen, it gave us a cleaner way to see whether measurable nitrogen forms built up over time.

That is why we see these results as important early evidence. They do not prove whole-field performance on their own. However, they do show a strong enough signal to justify serious on-farm validation.

What comes next

That next stage is already underway.

Last season, we started independent field trials of BactoStym Nitro through an accredited institution that runs recognised agronomic evaluations. Those results are now being processed, and we expect them in the coming months.

So, this is where we are today:

We have a controlled nitrogen-free comparison that showed a strong ammonium nitrogen response in the BactoStym Nitro series.

Now we are waiting for the independent field data that will show how that translates under practical farm conditions.

Why we are sharing this now

We are sharing this as a watch this space update from BactoTech.

Too often, biological products get discussed in broad claims. We would rather show the first controlled results clearly, explain what they do and do not mean, and then follow with field data when it is ready.

What BactoStym Nitro is designed for

BactoStym Nitro is a foliar microbiological spray designed to support nitrogen efficiency when crops do not respond as expected.

In practical terms, it fits the moment when:
– nitrogen is on,
– the crop still looks flat or patchy,
– and the grower wants a foliar biological support tool rather than another soil input.

Watch this space

We will share the independent field-trial results as soon as they are available. For now, the first message is clear: our controlled lab work showed a strong nitrogen trend in the BactoStym Nitro series, and the next step is real-world validation.

Read the full article here: https://bactotech.co.uk/foliar-nitrogen-fixing-spray/

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Azotobacter vinelandii: a practical look at free-living nitrogen-fixing biology in crop production

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Nitrogen efficiency is one of the biggest challenges in crop production.

Growers want reliable performance, lower losses, and better value from every unit of applied nutrition. At the same time, the industry is under growing pressure to cut waste, improve resilience, and find practical biological tools that fit real farm systems.

One species that deserves more attention is Azotobacter vinelandii.

Azotobacter vinelandii is a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium found in soil. Unlike Rhizobium, it does not need to form nodules on legumes. Instead, it lives in the root zone and is known for helping convert atmospheric nitrogen into forms linked with plant growth. Research also links Azotobacter species with root support, plant-growth effects, and better nutrient availability.

Why this matters

This makes it interesting for more than one reason.

First, it brings value to the nitrogen-efficiency discussion. Second, it supports the wider shift from purely chemical input thinking towards systems that combine biology, soil function, and crop nutrition. Third, it raises important questions about how free-living microbial species can fit into practical crop programmes without overclaiming what they can do.

A practical view, not hype

At BactoTech UK, we have been looking closely at this species because we believe biology needs to be discussed in a more practical and evidence-led way.

The key point is this: Azotobacter vinelandii is not a magic replacement for agronomy. It will not solve compaction, poor drainage, or weak nutrition planning on its own. However, in the right setting, it may help support better nitrogen use, stronger root-zone activity, and a more resilient soil-plant system.

That is why we think the conversation around biological inputs needs to move beyond hype.

The more useful questions

Where does this biology fit best?
What field problems is it really helping with?
How should growers assess success?
And how do we connect microbial products to real crop outcomes rather than broad promises?

What we have explored

We have written a practical overview of Azotobacter vinelandii to explore those questions in more detail, including how it works in soil, how it differs from Rhizobium, where it may help most on farm, what it will not solve on its own, and why mixed microbial systems are becoming more interesting in current research.

Join the conversation

We would be very interested to hear from growers, advisers, researchers, and agritech businesses working on nitrogen efficiency, biological inputs, and root-zone performance.

What role do you think free-living nitrogen-fixing biology can REALISTICALLY play in future crop nutrition programmes?

Read the full article via the link: https://bactotech.co.uk/azotobacter-vinelandii/

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

UK Precision Breeding Act – transforming crop development and food security

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The UK’s agricultural sector is entering a new era with the implementation of the  Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023, positioning England as a European leader in agri-tech innovation. This landmark legislation opens the door for advanced breeding techniques like precision breeding, which promises faster, more accurate crop development to meet the challenges of climate change and global food security.

From traditional breeding to precision science

For centuries, plant breeding has relied on crossing two parent plants and hoping nature delivers the right combination of traits. While this process is guided by expertise, it involves uncertainty and can take decades to achieve desired results.

Precision breeding changes the game. Instead of waiting for chance, scientists make targeted adjustments to a plant’s existing genetic material—without introducing foreign genes. Unlike GMOs, which transfer genes from other species, precision breeding works within the plant’s own DNA, creating improvements that mimic what traditional breeding could achieve, only much faster.

How is precision breeding different from gene editing?

The term gene editing was widely used in the past, but the scientific community now prefers precision breeding to avoid confusion with genetic modification (GMO), which involves adding foreign DNA. Precision breeding simply accelerates natural processes without introducing external genetic material.

Speed and accuracy: Cutting development time by a decade

One of the most significant advantages of precision breeding is speed. Experts estimate it can reduce the time to develop a new variety by 5–10 years, accelerating innovation for growers and consumers alike. This efficiency is crucial as the global population approaches 10 billion and the demand for resilient, high-yield crops intensifies.

Traditional breeding often introduces unintended genetic changes, while older techniques like mutagenesis—used since the 1960s—cause widespread, random modifications. Precision breeding avoids these pitfalls by making defined, targeted changes, ensuring better outcomes for farmers and the environment.

Legislation unlocks innovation

The UK’s new regulatory framework makes it easier to test and commercialize precision-bred plants. This science-led approach supports sustainable agriculture by enabling crops that are more resistant to disease, better adapted to climate extremes, and capable of producing higher yields with fewer inputs like fertilizers and pesticides.

As policymakers and industry look for ways to futureproof the nation’s food system, the conversation is increasingly shifting from whether we should adopt new breeding technologies to how quickly we can deploy them responsibly. The pressures driving this shift are not abstract—they’re felt in everyday life, from rising food prices to the growing unpredictability of global supply chains. Against this backdrop, the role of precision breeding becomes clearer: it is not simply a scientific advancement, but a practical response to a world where food security can no longer be taken for granted.

Elsoms_26March25_071-768x512
Rodrigo-Lab-RandD

Rodrigo Echegoyén-Nava, Elsoms Head of Research and Lab Services, captures this reality succinctly:

“We’re currently living in a world that constantly presents challenges in nearly all aspects of our lives. You might not have the newest flagship model phone, stop your news feed or follow your favourite musician on social media, but you will still need to eat something every single day.

Food security has become one of the main concerns globally. Precision breeding emerges as an additional tool to allow breeders and scientists develop higher yield, more resilient plant varieties, by exploiting crops at their full potential.”

Addressing public perception

Despite its benefits, precision breeding faces misconceptions. Many assume it’s radically different from traditional breeding, but in reality, it’s a more precise version of what breeders have done for millennia. There’s nothing extra left in the plant, no foreign DNA—just improvements that nature could have produced over time.

Why it matters

Without continued investment in plant breeding, agriculture risks stagnation. As David Coop, Elsoms Managing Director warns:

“If no company can afford to produce new varieties, we will simply have to make do with what we’ve already got. Nature will catch up with us, and we won’t be able to produce enough food for a growing population.”

Precision breeding offers a solution—faster innovation, stronger crops, and a sustainable future for farming.

CASE STUDY: Development of a Handheld Soil Health Measurement Device

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

In this case study we share how Cambridge-based product design, engineering and development specialist, eg technology worked with PES Technologies to develop their Handheld Soil Health Measurement Device from concept to commercialisation.

Background

PES Technologies, a family-founded start-up, set out to revolutionise how soil health is measured. Building on a PhD in experimental solid-state physics, they developed a sensor capable of detecting biological, chemical and physical indicators of soil health within minutes, directly in the field. This was a significant leap from traditional lab-based methods that typically take days.

With early prototypes in hand and a vision for scalable impact, PES approached eg technology to help refine their concept and bring a commercial product to life.

By reducing the friction of data collection, PES empowers farmers and advisors to make informed decisions.

Soil health is at the core of effective agronomy, shaping recommendations, guiding research and influencing long-term sustainable land management strategies.

 

From Concept to Commercialisation

Our initial engagement focused on the critical technology – developing a sensitive, accurate and robust measurement circuit, so that reliable measurements could be taken, using PES Technology’s sensors in the field. This foundational work helped PES secure funding and build an alpha prototype. As the company grew, they returned to eg technology to develop a fully integrated, Bluetooth enabled portable soil testing device and to support its transfer to manufacture.

With investor timelines looming and limited internal resources, PES needed a partner who could deliver a marketable product for use by agronomists, in just six months. We assembled a dedicated, cross-disciplinary team to meet this challenge head-on.

“Time, cost and complexity can prevent meaningful engagement from farmers and land managers.” – PES Technologies

PES-electronics
PES-from-concept-to-commercialisation

The PES device measures 12+ key indicators of soil quality in minutes, including microbial biomass, organic matter & pH levels

Designing the solution

Working closely with PES engineers, we developed a detailed project plan and executed a phased development programme. The project involved the technical development of the mechanical and electrical subsystems, as well as the embedded device software.
The project began with understanding the use case, industrial design and designing the system architecture to address complex challenges, such as ‘how to package a reel of sensors into a bespoke cassette to protect them until use’, and managing real-life situations such as ‘preserving data until a cloud connection is available’.
The usability of the final product form was progressed in tandem with the programmable electromechanical systems, and alongside the client’s app development and sensor production, requiring tight collaboration between the different disciplines, as well as with the client. From our experience of working with other science-led start-ups, we were aware that measurement protocols tend to evolve as the client’s experience with the underlying science develops. Therefore, we ensured that it was easy for PES to adapt the measurement protocols from their smartphone application.

There were many moving parts in this development, and considerations had to be made for the environment in which the final device would be operated. The unit needed to be physically and aesthetically robust, not only to protect the sensitive components inside, but also to give the user confidence in its successful operation in harsh environments. The client also specified the final device should be intuitive, simple to use, easily paired with the accompanying mobile application and should hold a sufficient charge to last for a full day’s use in the field.

Significant use of prototyping and development of test harnesses allowed us and PES to efficiently test and debug the real-world performance of the device, cassette and app, prior to finalising the design for manufacture and releasing data for an initial small batch build, assembled by the client.

The development journey consisted of:

  • Concept generation and proof-of-principle model
  • Alpha and beta prototypes
  • Pre-production prototype
  • Performance testing
  • Transfer to manufacture

Throughout this phased project, we supported PES in solving technical challenges and aligning the product with commercial goals.

A variety of prototyping methods were used across the development process to de-risk different elements of the design

 

A Scalable, Field-Ready Solution

Working closely with PES, our engineers designed a robust, hand-held, rechargeable design, suitable for scale-up manufacture. The smartphone-controlled device, with its cassette of sensors enables rapid testing of soil, and in conjunction with PES’ mobile app and cloud-based machine learning, delivers real-time, in-field, GPS-stamped soil health indicators from organic matter to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium levels directly to the user.
The project advanced their Technology Readiness Level from TRL 3-4 to TRL 7-8, positioning them for commercial rollout. Our managed, collaborative approach enabled PES to meet their tight deadlines without compromising on quality or functionality.
Regulatory compliance was prioritised, with the final device passing relevant electrical and mechanical safety tests, including EMC, for each of the target markets. The unit is UKCA marked and PES are working towards a CE Mark.
In 2024, PES received industry acclaim as they won the award for Innovation Excellence at the FPC Fresh Awards and were crowned Agri-Tech Innovator of the Year 2024 at the British Farming Awards.

 

eg technology’s collaborative approach and technical expertise were instrumental in turning our vision into a reality. Their team helped us move from a promising prototype to a field-ready product, in an accelerated and challenging timeframe. eg delivered a robust, intuitive device that empowers agronomists with real-time soil health insights. We’re excited to continue working with eg technology as we scale our impact.

Steve Lock | PES Technologies

 

“Collaborating with PES Technologies to transform their pioneering soil health sensor into a robust, field-ready device was a rewarding journey. Our engineering team worked across disciplines, from concept generation through to transfer to manufacture, advancing their technology readiness significantly, and we’re proud to continue supporting PES as they scale their product and vision.”

Ollie Godbold | eg technology

 

Are you ready to develop your innovation?

For further information on how eg technology can support in getting your technology or ideas to market or to chat with one of the eg team about your product design and development requirements, please get in touch.