Costs give impetus for innovation for leaf producer

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The market for spinach and baby leaf remains tight, constrained by the crop’s fragility and the lack of viable export pathways. Demand is largely fixed given that there’s only so much leaf people want to eat, and export of such a fragile product is not cost-effective.

But the big enemy in growing leafy veg is the weather, particularly the heat and humidity. Even so, Mike Fielden of Boratto Farms says his produce has held up well.

 

“Season’s been good,” he says, with strong performance a feature of the peak demand periods of Christmas and Australia Day. The third market peak, however, is likely to be more challenging. “Easter will be a bit of a struggle because of quality,” he explains, after a period of high heat and humidity in late summer led to issues such as tip burn, mildew, and pythium. “In Australia… you’re always going to pick up a problem within your three-key-event portfolio.”

For a crop that cannot be stored or redirected, those disruptions carry immediate consequences. Supply and demand have to be tightly wed.

Unlike in other areas of produce, there’s no other outlet, so you can’t simply produce more and hope for the best. “I could take a punt in potatoes, but in baby leaf, if you don’t have a customer, you’re stuffed,” Fielden says. “I can’t store it; I can’t keep it.”

At the same time, rising input costs and retailer pressure on pricing have eroded margins. “You can’t afford to have a return from the acre of land,” he notes.

 

 

That cost pressure is driving a growing focus on technology, particularly AI, as a way to reduce waste and improve decision-making across the supply chain. Fielden points to two systems in particular: drone-based field mapping from Polybee and in-line quality assessment from GoMicro AI.

Polybee’s drones fly over fields to create what Fielden describes as a “digital twin”, mapping crop conditions down to leaf level. That allows growers to assess yield and quality before committing further costs. “If they say the crop’s not worth harvesting, I don’t harvest it… I’ve only lost up to that point,” he says. “I haven’t added on my harvest cost and transport costs.”

Once the product moves beyond the field, GoMicro AI provides a second layer of control through objective quality assessment. Here, the focus is on removing the subjectivity that has long defined fresh produce trading.

“The trouble with how we measure things currently is it’s desperately subjective,” Fielden says. “I can look at a leaf of spinach, and you can look at it… and we’re probably both going to have a different assessment. I might think my spinach is fantastic, but you just might not agree.”

 

 

By replacing that human variability with consistent, data-driven evaluation, AI creates a shared standard between grower and buyer. “If you can find something that is an objective measurement, then that takes that away,” he says. “It reduces the aggravation between partners.”

The cost implications run through the entire chain. Early rejection of substandard crops avoids unnecessary harvesting, transport, and processing, while more accurate grading reduces labour and waste at the factory level. “You can identify through the entire supply chain costs that you can avoid,” Fielden says, noting that even small savings compound when applied across multiple stages.

Equally important is the data generated over time. With multiple growing cycles each year, spinach offers a rapid feedback loop, allowing patterns to be identified and production adjusted accordingly. “The beauty of AI is you can collect that data… it tells you exactly what it was like,” he says.

In a category where margins are tight and risk is constant, that combination of cost control and consistency is increasingly critical. “The maths soon adds up,” Fielden says. “If it gets a better product on the shelf… we’re all better off.”

 

Harnessing Heavy Rain: Wetlands as Nature’s Carbon Champions

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

How excess water can become one of our most powerful climate tools

Across many landscapes, heavy rainfall is no longer unusual. Fields flood, planting is delayed, and soil begins to erode. The instinct is to move water on as quickly as possible. But what if that instinct is outdated?

 

At Ponda, we see a different possibility. In a changing climate, excess rain is not just a disruption, but a really precious resource we can hold in the correct ways.  By looking at farming techniques like paludiculture, we unlock one of the most effective ways to store carbon in the landscape. 

 

The Cost of Keeping Land Dry

Modern agriculture has been shaped by drainage and intense drying. Water is treated as a barrier to productivity, something to remove through ditches and pipes, lowering water tables to keep soils workable.

That approach delivers short-term results, but it comes with hidden costs. As soils dry, organic matter breaks down and carbon is released into the atmosphere. Over time, fertility declines and the land becomes harder to sustain. Meanwhile, the water that is pushed off the land does not disappear. It moves downstream, often increasing flood risk elsewhere.

“Over the most recent decade (2015–2024), the UK’s winter half‑year (October to March) has become about 16 % wetter compared with the 1961–1990 average, driven by changes in a warming climate.” – Met Office, 2025

 As rainfall intensifies, this traditional system is being pushed to its limits. The effort to stay dry is becoming harder to maintain, and less effective.

Wet soil tells a different story. When land remains saturated, decomposition slows and carbon stays locked in the ground. This is how peatlands and wetlands build some of the most important carbon stores on Earth.

Holding water in the landscape is not just about managing floods. It is a direct way to protect and rebuild soil carbon while stabilising the land itself.

As Natural England (2025) highlights:

“Nature-based solutions create and interconnect habitats for wildlife and improve soil structure and quality by reducing uncontrolled flooding, run-off and loss of topsoil. This approach can turn less-productive farmland into vibrant wetlands that not only absorb excess water and carbon but also support biodiversity.”

 

 

A Different Way to Farm

For many farmers, productivity has traditionally meant only growing grains, vegetables, or livestock. But climate pressures are changing what “productive” really looks like. In some regions, heavy rainfall is the challenge; in others, particularly in eastern England, water scarcity is a constant struggle.

At Ponda, we partner with farmers to re-wet dried land, allowing us to source Typha for our bio-based insulation, BioPuff. Reeds can also be harvested for construction and bioenergy, sphagnum moss for horticultural markets.  Even in drier areas, re-wetting degraded peat or capturing rainfall when it occurs creates new opportunities for resilient and profitable farming systems that work with the land and climate rather than against them.

By thinking of land as a multi-purpose asset, farmers can build diverse income streams while also restoring ecosystems, improving soil, and storing carbon. It’s not just about coping with extremes; it’s about using land more creatively to make it productive under a wide range of climate conditions.

Our Agriculture Lead at Ponda, Austin Shepherd explains: 

Growing Typha in a paludiculture or wetter farming system is all about transforming risk into resilience on wetter land. These plants act like sponges, converting waterlogged areas into productive, low-risk zones that protect soils and retain organic matter and carbon on drained areas. They also buffer floods, safeguarding fields better suited to conventional food production. This approach generates feedstock for biobased supply chains like ours, whilst allowing landowners and farms to gain both economic and ecological improvements, working with nature rather than against it.”

The need for this shift is urgent. Farmers face increasing pressures from unpredictable weather, and adapting can feel overwhelming. A recent study by the UK Climate Resilience Programme, published in Climate Risk Management and led by Dr Rebecca Wheeler and Professor Matt Lobley from the University of Exeter’s Centre for Rural Policy Research, highlighted this tension. Dr Wheeler observed:

Farmers have an array of challenges and uncertainties to cope with, and it is understandable they are focused on the short-term profitability and survival of their business. This seems to be preventing them from adapting to the effects of the climate emergency. It is essential the industry finds ways to build resilience, and that farm businesses are supported in planning and responding to changing weather patterns.”

Paludiculture provides exactly that kind of support. By working with water rather than against it, farmers can protect carbon stores, enhance soil health, and maintain productivity even under increasingly unpredictable rainfall. Crops are carefully selected for wet conditions, from reeds for construction and bioenergy to sphagnum moss for horticulture. Productivity does not vanish, it evolves into something better suited to the environment.

The result is a resilient, climate-smart system. Carbon stays locked in the soil, drainage dependence is reduced, and water moves more slowly across the landscape. At the same time, habitats are restored, biodiversity thrives, and the land becomes more robust against extremes.

For decades, land management has been about control. Now, resilience depends on collaboration with natural systems. Excess rainfall, when managed strategically, transforms from a threat into an asset. It can store carbon, reduce flood risk, and support new forms of agriculture designed for a wetter, more unpredictable future.

At Ponda, we believe wet landscapes are not marginal. They are essential. Learning to work with water is not just adaptation. It is a chance to restore carbon, support biodiversity, and reshape how land creates value for the future.

 


If you’re looking to turn your land into something that delivers long-term benefits for the planet and wildlife while supporting a cleaner fashion supply chain, get in touch. We’d love to chat and explore how wetlands could work for you.

For any questions about wetland restoration or Typha cultivation, you can reach Austin at:

‍Email: austin@ponda.bio

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Demo Day at Elveden Estate 12 May: Soils and Water Management Innovation

Member News
Agri-TechE

Elveden Estate will host Agri‑TechE’s upcoming Demo Day on Soils and Water Management on 12 May, bringing farmers and technologists together to explore practical solutions for soil health and water efficiency in one of the driest regions of the UK.

Attendees will join Managing Director Andrew Blenkiron for a guided walk around the farm, gaining insight into Elveden’s environmentally responsible approach to managing over 10,000 acres of productive farmland. The estate is known for its large‑scale vegetable production, growing significant proportions of the UK’s onions, carrots, parsnips and potatoes, while maintaining a strong commitment to biodiversity and long‑term soil fertility.

The event will feature live demonstrations and pitches from leading innovators in soil and water management, including technologies for soil moisture sensing, irrigation efficiency, biological soil health measurement, and satellite‑enabled connectivity. Participants will also have the chance to network with other farmers and technology developers exploring new tools to support sustainable agriculture.

This Demo Day is ideal for growers seeking practical, on‑farm innovations and for technologists looking to test or showcase new products. Limited places are available, with discounted tickets for Agri‑TechE members and farmers – click here for more info and booking.

AI removing the “subjectivity tax” on the supply chain

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

For decades, quality in fresh produce has been defined less by science than by interpretation. Buyers set the bar, growers try to meet it, and disputes emerge in the gap between the two. Increasingly, that gap is being targeted by AI systems designed to turn subjective judgment into something closer to measurable, shared standards.

 

According to Dr Sivam Krish, founder of GoMicro AI, at the centre of the shift is a simple idea: buyers already decide what “good” looks like, so training AI on images that reflect good and bad quality and specific defects allows it to assess produce consistently across the supply chain.

“The one problem is subjective assessment,” says Krish. “The seller, the farmer, thinks his stock is good, it goes to the other side, they say it’s bad for various reasons… and there’s no way to resolve that problem because on the other side, another human being is assessing it subjectively.”

That subjectivity carries a financial penalty. Rejections at the buyer end often leave growers absorbing the loss, with little ability to challenge the outcome. By the time produce is turned away, it may have limited alternative uses, leading to discounting, write-offs, or waste. In this way, subjectivity in quality control operates as a kind of “tax” on the supply chain, as inconsistent assessments create hidden costs at every step.

But being able to apply a unified standard early in the supply chain promises to allow diversion of produce to other uses, rather than allowing it to proceed to rejection and, in some cases, waste.

 

What changes with AI is not just automation, but alignment. Rather than relying on multiple human inspectors at different points in the chain — each applying slightly different judgment — systems can be trained to replicate a single, consistent standard.

“We replicate the judgment of one human being,” Krish says. “And then that judgment can be applied throughout the chain. There’s no point in the farmer saying it’s good; the buyer has to say it’s good.”

In practical terms, that removes much of the ambiguity that drives disputes. If both shipper and receiver are assessing against the same model, trained on the same definition of quality, disagreements shift from opinion to verifiable difference — or disappear altogether.

For growers, the cost benefits are immediate. Assessing fruit against the buyer’s standard before it leaves the packhouse reduces the risk of rejection and the associated freight, handling, and disposal costs. It also allows the product to be redirected earlier.

“The shipper also knows, okay if I send this… it’s going to be rejected anyway because this is how they judge,” Krish says.

That ability to make decisions upstream is critical in perishable categories such as berries and leafy greens, where delays quickly erode value. Instead of shipping borderline product into high-spec retail channels, growers can allocate it to processing or lower-spec markets, preserving margin that would otherwise be lost.

The technical barrier has historically been accuracy, particularly in produce where defects are subtle or obscured. “If the defects are obvious, it can be done,” Krish says. “But if they are subtle, it’s hard to do.” That includes issues like leaf-on-leaf contamination in spinach or minor bruising in strawberries.

 

 

“What we have cracked is the ability to detect very subtle defects, even those that are hard to detect by eye,” he says, adding that systems can assess produce even when items overlap — a longstanding limitation in automated grading.

Crucially, the approach does not depend on a single universal standard. Instead, AI can be trained rapidly on specific buyer preferences using sample sets, effectively digitising subjective judgment.

“This is how the model works. You give it examples of images that show it this is good quality… this is really bad… and the model will learn to reproduce them faithfully. So in that way, you can create categories,” Krish says.

In a sector defined by biological variability and shifting expectations, the result is a shared, transparent framework that reduces friction, cuts waste, and lowers the hidden costs of disagreement — replacing subjective calls with consistent, repeatable assessment.

Global Weather, Grain Markets & Nitrogen

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

While much of the agronomic conversations are focused on upcoming fungicide and spray programmes, the market outlook for wheat and fertiliser is just as important for shaping spring decisions. Here’s what’s driving the market and what it means for farm businesses in Spring 2026.

US Winter Wheat Under Significant Heat Stress

One of the biggest market movers right now comes from the US Plains, where winter wheat crops are battling heat and drought stress.

This includes:

  • Severely low soil moisture, particularly in Kansas – one of the largest US wheat‑producing states.
  • A forecast showing temperatures up to 15°C above normal, with some areas expected to hit 30°C next week.
  • Worsening crop condition scores across several major wheat states.

 

US heat map showing mean temperature anomalies
Figure 1. Example heat map of the US showing temperature anomalies between 21st and 22nd March 2026.

 

Why this matters:
Tighter US supply expectations tend to support global prices, especially for milling wheat. With US crops under pressure so early in the season, the market is on alert for further deterioration.

UK Wheat Imports Slow – Tightening Domestic Balance

Closer to home, the UK wheat balance sheet is showing signs of tightening:

  • Imports from July–January are down 443kt compared with last season.
  • Total wheat imports currently sit at 1.5 million tonnes.

A slower pace of arrivals generally supports domestic basis, particularly in regions dependent on imported milling wheat. If the trend continues into spring, UK buyers may need to stay more active in the market to secure coverage.

Fertiliser Markets: Post‑War Highs and Big Supply Disruptions

Fertiliser markets remain volatile, with several geopolitical and supply‑chain issues adding upward pressure:

  • Iran has destroyed 16 commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz in the first two weeks of the conflict, disrupting critical nitrogen transport routes.
  • Both energy and fertiliser markets are now trading at post‑war highs.
  • High nitrogen prices are already influencing planting choices:
    • US growers shifting towards soya
    • EU growers leaning to sunflowers or lower‑N alternatives

This shift reduces demand for N‑heavy crops and indirectly supports global grain prices.

A Rare Inverse in the Fertiliser Market

One notable trend is the extremely strong market inverse:

  • Spot prices are significantly higher than forward values
  • May–August forward nitrogen is currently ~30% cheaper than today’s spot

This suggests the market is pricing in a short‑term supply squeeze, driven by transport disruption rather than long‑term scarcity.

Practical takeaway:
Growers may benefit from flexible purchasing strategies this spring, particularly if cashflow is under pressure. But any delayed buying comes with the risk of short-term availability issues.

Regulation to Watch: UK CBAM Nitrogen Tax

The UK is considering its own version of CBAM from January 2027, which could further complicate the regulatory landscape and pricing structures. Still, the CBAM coming into effect in the EU from 2026 will have implications on the UK ahead of 2027. Early modelling suggests an uplift of £50–£70/t. This could incentivise greater use of urea, which is more nutrient-dense and may perform better under CBAM rules. You can read more about this new potential carbon cost here. 

What Should Farmers Be Thinking About Now?

Given the current climate, wheat and fertiliser markets will remain sensitive to:

  • US crop ratings over the next 4–6 weeks
  • Ongoing logistics disruption in the Middle East
  • UK import pace and domestic demand trends
  • Spring nitrogen buying behaviour
  • Regulatory pressure on fertiliser types and timings

For growers, this means staying flexible and well‑informed. Both grain and nitrogen markets look set for another turbulent season, but understanding the forces behind them can help keep decision‑making grounded.

More Information

If you would like to discuss these topics further, please do get in contact today.
  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Can farmers afford (not) to trial biological tools this season?

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

To trial or not to trial?

A practical case for using 2026 as a year to test, learn and build nutrient resilience

For much of the past few seasons, farmers have had to navigate input volatility as part of normal business. But 2026 feels slightly different.

Nitrogen remains closely tied to gas and energy markets. Synthetic phosphorus fertilisers are also under pressure, not only because of cost, but because phosphate supply depends on sulphur and fragile global trade routes. Oil continues to influence the wider cost base through diesel, transport, plastics and logistics.

This is not just a nitrogen story. It is also a phosphorus-efficiency story.

None of that is good news in itself. But it does create a useful moment for the industry.

Instead of viewing this season only as another risk to manage, perhaps it makes more sense to treat it as a year to test practical alternatives that may improve nutrient efficiency and reduce exposure to volatility.

From input buying to nutrient strategy

This is no longer just a fertiliser purchasing conversation. It is becoming a nutrient strategy conversation.

When conventional inputs become harder to predict, harder to justify and more exposed to global disruption, the question shifts. The focus moves away from “How do we buy the same programme more cheaply?” and towards

“How do we make every unit of nitrogen and phosphorus deliver more value?”

That is an important change in mindset.

Nitrogen often gets the most attention because the price risk appears quickly. But phosphorus deserves just as much focus. On many farms, the issue is not simply whether phosphorus is present. The issue is whether the crop can access enough of it when it matters.

On many farms, phosphorus is not missing. It is present, but not fully available to the crop.

That means the industry is dealing with two separate but connected questions at once: how to protect nitrogen efficiency, and how to improve phosphorus availability.

Why this season should be use proactively

In years like this, it is easy to become reactive. Growers watch markets, delay decisions, worry about replacement cost, and try to limit risk. That is understandable. But it may not be the best long-term response. A better response may be to use this season proactively. To test. To compare. To gather evidence under real farm conditions.

Not because biology is a silver bullet.
Not because one product will solve every nutrition problem.
But because side-by-side farm trials can answer practical commercial questions before the next season arrives.

The questions worth testing now

Can a biological tool help unlock more phosphorus that is already in the soil?
Can it improve nitrogen use efficiency?
Can it support crop response during stress?
Can it help reduce dependence on the most volatile parts of the input programme?

Those are worthwhile questions in any season. In 2026, they look especially relevant.

This is a good year to test, not panic.

The case for trials, not hype

Farmers do not need to “believe” in a category first. They need to test it properly. That means keeping comparisons simple, changing as few variables as possible, and measuring more than yield alone. Crop consistency, rooting, visible response, timing, fertiliser rate, and margin all matter.

This is where biological products become more than an interesting idea. They become a practical part of on-farm learning. And that may be the real opportunity this season offers.

If a farm can run a fair strip trial in 2026 and learn something useful about phosphorus availability, nitrogen response or nutrient cycling, that knowledge may prove more valuable than waiting another year and facing the same volatility with no new evidence.

A more positive way to frame the biological conversation

Too often, the conversation around biology swings between two extremes. Either it is oversold as the answer to everything, or dismissed too quickly because it does not replace conventional fertiliser overnight.

Neither view is especially helpful.

But what if this is the year to test whether biological tools can improve nutrient efficiency and reduce exposure to volatile inputs?

The goal is not to replace everything overnight. The goal is to test what works under real farm conditions.

That is a serious, measurable and commercially relevant question that encourages innovation without abandoning practical agronomy.

Most importantly, it shifts the conversation from opinion to evidence.

Why this matters for the industry

No one wants farmers to reach next season and say, “We could have tested that when we had the chance.”

That is why this message matters now.

Not because the industry should panic.
Not because farms should make dramatic changes overnight.
But because they have an opportunity to use this season well.

There are now more biological tools on the market that target real nutrient-efficiency problems: locked-up phosphorus, inconsistent nitrogen response, stress-related underperformance, and nutrient tie-up in residues. The right response is not to assume they all work. It is to identify the right farm problem, run a proper trial, and measure the outcome honestly. That is how progress happens.

The smart question for 2026

The smart question for 2026 is not, “Why biology?”

It is, “Why not test it properly now?”

If nitrogen and phosphorus are becoming more expensive, more fragile and more politically exposed, then this season may be the right time to trial tools that could help crops make better use of what is already in the system.

This is not a message of fear. It is a message of opportunity.

And for a farming industry that has had to adapt quickly more than once in recent years, that feels like the right message to take into the season ahead.

READ MORE HERE: https://bactotech.co.uk/can-farmers-afford-not-to-trial-biological-tools/

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Bridging the Gap Between Innovation & On-Farm Adoption

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Ag-Tech innovators are pushing boundaries like never before, but taking a promising idea from concept to commercial on-farm adoption isn’t simple. It requires robust evidence, credible trials, farmer‑facing communication, and clear pathways to scale.

To accelerate this journey, we are excited to launch a new three‑stage service package designed specifically for innovators who want independent validation, on‑farm proof, and real‑world impact: Define > Develop > Demonstrate. Together, these stages provide a clear and practical route from existing evidence through to confident market uptake.

Dr Alex Setchfield, Research & Knowledge Exchange Manager at Ceres Research, says: “We’re excited by the strength of innovation emerging in Ag‑Tech. The key now is helping translate that science and research into confident farm practice through independent evidence, practical fit, and trusted communication. Our Define > Develop > Demonstrate package brings those elements together to support robust validation, informed decision‑making, and credible routes to market.”

So, whether you’re refining early R&D or preparing for widespread market entry, our structured yet flexible approach is designed to support your next steps and help you move forward confidently.

1. DEFINE: Independent Insight to Strengthen Your Innovation

Every successful product journey starts with clarity. Our Define service provides an independent review of your existing R&D data, trial work, and wider scientific literature to uncover opportunities, limitations, and next steps.

We work with you to assess:

  • Data quality, robustness, and validity
  • Alignment with peer‑reviewed evidence
  • Potential for productivity, profitability, and resilience gains
  • Scalability across soil types, farming systems, and regions
  • Adoption barriers and routes to overcome them at scale

Where appropriate, we can also include optional site visits with our partners at Ceres Rural to evaluate practical suitability for real‑world farming conditions.

Deliverables:

A clear, actionable report highlighting opportunities to progress your innovation, either refining within Define, or moving ahead to Develop.

2. DEVELOP: Turning R&D Questions into Credible On‑Farm Trials

When you’re ready to test your innovation in real farming systems, our Develop stage provides the scientific rigour, agricultural relevance, and project management needed to generate trusted, defensible evidence.

This includes:

  • Full trial design and protocols tailored to your R&D or market-entry questions
  • Trial delivery through Ceres Rural and our laboratory connections
  • Crop assessments, sample collection, and ongoing trial monitoring
  • Detailed data analysis, including cost-benefit evaluation at farm level
  • Clear reporting with results, conclusions, and recommended next steps

Outputs can be tailored to your needs – traditional reports, slide decks, infographics, or publishable industry‑ready material.

Deliverables:

Trial design and delivery, ongoing management and an evidence-backed report showing whether to continue the Development stage, or progress to Demonstrate.

3. DEMONSTRATE: Showcasing Innovation to Drive Farmer Adoption

The final step is taking your innovation to the people who will use it. Demonstrate provides tailored knowledge‑exchange (KE) activities that place your product directly in front of farmers and growers, agronomists and industry partners.

This may include:

  • Participation in Ceres On The Farm Days
  • Access via Ceres Research Membership and Agronomy Club channels
  • Bespoke demonstration days and showcase events
  • Interactive digital briefs and podcasts
  • Peer‑to‑peer learning opportunities to accelerate uptakeWe also track impact through attendance metrics, geographic reach, testimonials, and reported adoption intentions.

Deliverables:

A bespoke mix of KE activities, an adoption roadmap, and clear reporting to demonstrate the value and traction of your innovation within its target market.

Why Choose Ceres Research

✔ Independent, science-led evaluation and validation
✔ Real‑world farm trial evidence designed for credibility and commercial readiness
✔ Direct engagement with progressive UK farmers, growers, and agronomists
✔ A structured route from concept to adoption

Whether you’re developing biological innovations, digital tools, machinery, soil and plant technologies, or data‑driven platforms, Define > Develop > Demonstrate gives you the clarity, evidence, and reach to accelerate your product’s journey to market.

Ready to Move Forward?

We’d love to talk about how our new service package can support your R&D or market-entry plans.

Get in touch with the Ceres Research team to begin your Define, Develop and Demonstrate journey today.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

GoMicro Deploys Second AI Quality Control Unit to Australian Leafy Greens Grower

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Adelaide-based agtech company continues to build its track record in automated produce inspection — and is looking for UK partners.

GoMicro, the Australian agtech company developing AI-powered quality assessment for fresh produce, has shipped and installed its second GM Exceed unit at a leafy greens operation in Victoria’s Gippsland region.

The deployment follows GoMicro’s first commercial installation at Boratto Farms in late 2025 — widely covered in trade media — and represents a significant step in proving the system’s repeatability. The unit was built in Adelaide, shipped directly to the grower, and is now being fine-tuned remotely by GoMicro’s engineering team in collaboration with the farm’s QC lead.

What the Technology Does

The GM Exceed is a compact, self-contained quality assessment system designed for leafy greens packhouses. It uses AI trained on sample images — good quality, poor quality, specific defect types — to detect issues such as yellowing, pest damage, disease, and white spotting in real time. The system produces instant PDF reports with quality and size metrics, giving growers objective data where previously they relied on subjective human judgement.

Critically, the unit is designed so that any farm hand can operate it — no specialist QC training required. It works offline, with internet connectivity used for remote support and sharing QC reports.

Why This Matters for UK Growers

The UK’s leafy greens sector faces many of the same pressures driving adoption in Australia: labour shortages in QC roles, subjective grading that creates disputes between growers and buyers, and increasing retailer demand for traceability and consistency. GoMicro’s system addresses all three, and the company is actively seeking UK partners and early adopters.

 

Sivam-Ready-to-Ship-768x768
Dr Sivam Krish, GoMicro CEO, preparing the second GM Exceed unit for dispatch from Adelaide
GoMicro-initial-setup-at-second-farm

How to Engage with GoMicro

GoMicro is interested in connecting with UK leafy greens growers, packhouse operators, and industry bodies who want to explore AI-assisted quality assessment. The company offers online demonstrations and is open to conversations about how the technology could fit different operations.

What to expect from an initial conversation: a 15–20 minute online demonstration of the GM Exceed system running on real produce, followed by a discussion about your operation’s specific QC challenges and volumes. There is no obligation — GoMicro is genuinely interested in understanding whether its technology fits the UK context before making any commitments.

 

Get in Touch

Kristie Dutt, Business Development Lead, Email: kristie@gomicro.ai; Web: www.gomicro.ai

Agri-TechE members are welcome to reach out directly.

 

About GoMicro

GoMicro is an Australian agricultural technology company based at Adelaide’s Tonsley Innovation District. Founded by Dr Sivam Krish, the company develops AI-powered quality assessment systems — branded Quality Intelligence — for fresh produce including leafy greens, berries, and other horticultural crops. GoMicro’s systems are designed for real-world packhouse environments, with a focus on simplicity, durability, and objective repeatability.

The Inevitability of AI Quality Control

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Stand in a spinach field at 6:30 in the morning, and you will see both the brilliance of modern agriculture — and its tension.

Spinach grows fast. Sometimes a 24-day cycle from seed to harvest. Harvest too early, and the yield suffers. Too late and leaves lose value. The harvest decision itself is already an act of quality control. Once the machine starts moving, people walk ahead of it scanning the ground for anything that doesn’t belong — irrigation fragments, plastic, rogue weeds. Behind them, hundreds of kilograms of leaves are cut per minute. Millions of dollars are spent on quality control to ensure supermarket specifications are met.

The system depends on human vision. And that dependence is beginning to strain, particularly with labour shortages. Spinach, more than most crops, exposes something the industry rarely articulates clearly.

 

Quality Is Not Absolute

Article content

Fresh produce is biological. It varies by nature. No two leaves are identical. No two harvests are identical. Quality is a human framework imposed on nature to facilitate trade.

Customers expect consistency and quality. But quality is not a scientific constant. It is a commercial boundary applied to biological variability. When supply is abundant, tolerances tighten. When supply is constrained, they relax. Specifications are negotiated against reality.

Two experienced inspectors can assess the same batch and differ slightly — both defensible. Quality Assessment in fresh produce is largely subjective. Buyers and sellers rely on this flexibility to keep markets functioning when nature’s supply is unpredictable.

But subjectivity comes at a cost. Without objective quality measurement, interpretation drives price — leading to disputes, unfair practices, and significant food waste that ultimately harms both growers and consumers.

Contrast this with the trade of minerals, where the key attributes of value are measured precisely and shared transparently. When measurement is objective, trade becomes clearer, fairer, and far more efficient.

Article content

In the context of absolute standards, trust becomes an essential ingredient but is quickly eroded through disputes. The expansion of verification, inspection process and documentation adds costs, time, energy and friction, but does not resolve the fundamental issues arising out of subjectivity. This subjectivity is a tax in the agri-food chain.

Precise, transparent, digitally shared assessment reduces that tax. When both sides see the same structured data, negotiation becomes calibrated (based on verifiable data) rather than positional. Disagreements shrink from subjective debate to measurable variation.

AI will replace QC with Assessment

Article content

Traditional QC is structured as a gate — often operated by the buyer who optimise from the purchasing side and bears little of the cost of rejections. This is possible only because of the subjectivity of current manual QC processes.

Buyers work primarily on binary decisions: accept or reject when supply is pentlify. The seller has to bear the cost of rejection, which often includes disposal costs and in many cases, the seller negotiates a markdown and in some cases, provides the goods without charge. In Australia, “19% of rejected produce was recorded as being given away for free after rejection.”

Current QC processes are too crude for biological systems, extracting a heavy price, with around one-third (34%) of Australian vegetable growers now considering leaving the industry, according to the AUSVEG Industry Sentiment Report.

When quality is measured precisely and early — at or near harvest — produce can be segmented intelligently. Premium leaves move to high-spec retail, while slightly lower grades flow to processing, food service, or local markets. Supermarkets themselves often flex their standards when supply is tight rather than leave shelves empty.

AI assessment can manage this flexibility fairly and transparently, matching supply and demand through measurable — yet adaptable — quality thresholds.

Instead of discovering mismatches late in the supply chain, where waste becomes unavoidable, segmentation can happen upstream, helping growers maximise the value of the labour and resources already invested. What agriculture needs is not more crude QC, but assessment.

Turning Inspection into Infrastructure

Article content

Historically, quality control in fresh produce has been mandated by buyers and applied before dispatch and again at receipt — often by two different inspectors relying on subjective judgment. Spoilage during transportation adds yet another layer of variability.

The result is predictable: disputes, rejected shipments, and waste.

AI assessment changes the economics of this process. AI’s tireless eyes can inspect every leaf, every fruit, every vegetable, enabling assessment at unprecedented scale and accuracy across the entire supply chain.

Quality can now be verified both at dispatch and at receipt using the same standards, dramatically reducing disputes. And through mutual agreement, these standards can flex when supply conditions require it — allowing markets to balance supply and demand without compromising transparency.

QC therefore, stops being a buyer-managed filter and becomes a shared quality verification infrastructure. AI creates a common operating layer through which supply, demand, tolerance, and pricing can be aligned transparently and fairly.

This shift is not speculative — it is inevitable. Systems that reduce transaction costs, improve profitability, and reduce waste are always adopted.

Originally posted in LinkedIn – https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/inevitability-ai-quality-control-sivam-krish-ao7nc/

Dr Sivam Krish, GoMicro CEO, preparing the second GM Exceed unit for dispatch from Adelaide

 

Sivam Krish Reinventing Quality Control With AI | Founder, GoMicro | GenAI Pioneer & Keynote Speaker

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Foliar nitrogen fixing spray: what our first BactoStym Nitro results show

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

What we tested

We wanted to look at foliar nitrogen support in a clean and controlled way, so we set up a comparison in a nitrogen-free growth medium. One series received BactoStym Nitro. The second series received a market-leading foliar nitrogen-fixing benchmark. (We then sampled both series over time and asked an independent external laboratory to analyse the nitrogen profile.)

The goal was simple: remove added nitrogen from the system, then see how key nitrogen forms changed over time.

What the first results showed

  • The clearest signal came from ammonium nitrogen.

In the BactoStym Nitro series, ammonium nitrogen rose strongly through the test window, moving from 1.5 at T0 to 35.7 at T1, then to 60.9 at T2.

In the market-leading benchmark series, ammonium nitrogen stayed much lower, moving from 3.0 at T0 to 4.7 at T1, then falling to 0.6 at T2.

  • We also saw a difference in Kjeldahl nitrogen.

The benchmark series trended down from 223 at T0 to 118 at T2. By contrast, the BactoStym Nitro series rose overall from 129 at T0 to 170 at T2.

  • Meanwhile, nitrite nitrogen stayed below the lab quantification limit in both series throughout the test.

In simple terms, the lab comparison showed a much stronger ammonium nitrogen trend in the BactoStym Nitro series than in the benchmark series.

Why we think that matters

A lab is not a field, and we want to be clear about that.

However, this kind of controlled test still matters. Because the growth medium contained no added nitrogen, it gave us a cleaner way to see whether measurable nitrogen forms built up over time.

That is why we see these results as important early evidence. They do not prove whole-field performance on their own. However, they do show a strong enough signal to justify serious on-farm validation.

What comes next

That next stage is already underway.

Last season, we started independent field trials of BactoStym Nitro through an accredited institution that runs recognised agronomic evaluations. Those results are now being processed, and we expect them in the coming months.

So, this is where we are today:

We have a controlled nitrogen-free comparison that showed a strong ammonium nitrogen response in the BactoStym Nitro series.

Now we are waiting for the independent field data that will show how that translates under practical farm conditions.

Why we are sharing this now

We are sharing this as a watch this space update from BactoTech.

Too often, biological products get discussed in broad claims. We would rather show the first controlled results clearly, explain what they do and do not mean, and then follow with field data when it is ready.

What BactoStym Nitro is designed for

BactoStym Nitro is a foliar microbiological spray designed to support nitrogen efficiency when crops do not respond as expected.

In practical terms, it fits the moment when:
– nitrogen is on,
– the crop still looks flat or patchy,
– and the grower wants a foliar biological support tool rather than another soil input.

Watch this space

We will share the independent field-trial results as soon as they are available. For now, the first message is clear: our controlled lab work showed a strong nitrogen trend in the BactoStym Nitro series, and the next step is real-world validation.

Read the full article here: https://bactotech.co.uk/foliar-nitrogen-fixing-spray/

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Azotobacter vinelandii: a practical look at free-living nitrogen-fixing biology in crop production

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Nitrogen efficiency is one of the biggest challenges in crop production.

Growers want reliable performance, lower losses, and better value from every unit of applied nutrition. At the same time, the industry is under growing pressure to cut waste, improve resilience, and find practical biological tools that fit real farm systems.

One species that deserves more attention is Azotobacter vinelandii.

Azotobacter vinelandii is a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium found in soil. Unlike Rhizobium, it does not need to form nodules on legumes. Instead, it lives in the root zone and is known for helping convert atmospheric nitrogen into forms linked with plant growth. Research also links Azotobacter species with root support, plant-growth effects, and better nutrient availability.

Why this matters

This makes it interesting for more than one reason.

First, it brings value to the nitrogen-efficiency discussion. Second, it supports the wider shift from purely chemical input thinking towards systems that combine biology, soil function, and crop nutrition. Third, it raises important questions about how free-living microbial species can fit into practical crop programmes without overclaiming what they can do.

A practical view, not hype

At BactoTech UK, we have been looking closely at this species because we believe biology needs to be discussed in a more practical and evidence-led way.

The key point is this: Azotobacter vinelandii is not a magic replacement for agronomy. It will not solve compaction, poor drainage, or weak nutrition planning on its own. However, in the right setting, it may help support better nitrogen use, stronger root-zone activity, and a more resilient soil-plant system.

That is why we think the conversation around biological inputs needs to move beyond hype.

The more useful questions

Where does this biology fit best?
What field problems is it really helping with?
How should growers assess success?
And how do we connect microbial products to real crop outcomes rather than broad promises?

What we have explored

We have written a practical overview of Azotobacter vinelandii to explore those questions in more detail, including how it works in soil, how it differs from Rhizobium, where it may help most on farm, what it will not solve on its own, and why mixed microbial systems are becoming more interesting in current research.

Join the conversation

We would be very interested to hear from growers, advisers, researchers, and agritech businesses working on nitrogen efficiency, biological inputs, and root-zone performance.

What role do you think free-living nitrogen-fixing biology can REALISTICALLY play in future crop nutrition programmes?

Read the full article via the link: https://bactotech.co.uk/azotobacter-vinelandii/

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

UK Precision Breeding Act – transforming crop development and food security

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The UK’s agricultural sector is entering a new era with the implementation of the  Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Act 2023, positioning England as a European leader in agri-tech innovation. This landmark legislation opens the door for advanced breeding techniques like precision breeding, which promises faster, more accurate crop development to meet the challenges of climate change and global food security.

From traditional breeding to precision science

For centuries, plant breeding has relied on crossing two parent plants and hoping nature delivers the right combination of traits. While this process is guided by expertise, it involves uncertainty and can take decades to achieve desired results.

Precision breeding changes the game. Instead of waiting for chance, scientists make targeted adjustments to a plant’s existing genetic material—without introducing foreign genes. Unlike GMOs, which transfer genes from other species, precision breeding works within the plant’s own DNA, creating improvements that mimic what traditional breeding could achieve, only much faster.

How is precision breeding different from gene editing?

The term gene editing was widely used in the past, but the scientific community now prefers precision breeding to avoid confusion with genetic modification (GMO), which involves adding foreign DNA. Precision breeding simply accelerates natural processes without introducing external genetic material.

Speed and accuracy: Cutting development time by a decade

One of the most significant advantages of precision breeding is speed. Experts estimate it can reduce the time to develop a new variety by 5–10 years, accelerating innovation for growers and consumers alike. This efficiency is crucial as the global population approaches 10 billion and the demand for resilient, high-yield crops intensifies.

Traditional breeding often introduces unintended genetic changes, while older techniques like mutagenesis—used since the 1960s—cause widespread, random modifications. Precision breeding avoids these pitfalls by making defined, targeted changes, ensuring better outcomes for farmers and the environment.

Legislation unlocks innovation

The UK’s new regulatory framework makes it easier to test and commercialize precision-bred plants. This science-led approach supports sustainable agriculture by enabling crops that are more resistant to disease, better adapted to climate extremes, and capable of producing higher yields with fewer inputs like fertilizers and pesticides.

As policymakers and industry look for ways to futureproof the nation’s food system, the conversation is increasingly shifting from whether we should adopt new breeding technologies to how quickly we can deploy them responsibly. The pressures driving this shift are not abstract—they’re felt in everyday life, from rising food prices to the growing unpredictability of global supply chains. Against this backdrop, the role of precision breeding becomes clearer: it is not simply a scientific advancement, but a practical response to a world where food security can no longer be taken for granted.

Elsoms_26March25_071-768x512
Rodrigo-Lab-RandD

Rodrigo Echegoyén-Nava, Elsoms Head of Research and Lab Services, captures this reality succinctly:

“We’re currently living in a world that constantly presents challenges in nearly all aspects of our lives. You might not have the newest flagship model phone, stop your news feed or follow your favourite musician on social media, but you will still need to eat something every single day.

Food security has become one of the main concerns globally. Precision breeding emerges as an additional tool to allow breeders and scientists develop higher yield, more resilient plant varieties, by exploiting crops at their full potential.”

Addressing public perception

Despite its benefits, precision breeding faces misconceptions. Many assume it’s radically different from traditional breeding, but in reality, it’s a more precise version of what breeders have done for millennia. There’s nothing extra left in the plant, no foreign DNA—just improvements that nature could have produced over time.

Why it matters

Without continued investment in plant breeding, agriculture risks stagnation. As David Coop, Elsoms Managing Director warns:

“If no company can afford to produce new varieties, we will simply have to make do with what we’ve already got. Nature will catch up with us, and we won’t be able to produce enough food for a growing population.”

Precision breeding offers a solution—faster innovation, stronger crops, and a sustainable future for farming.