Looking at Integrated Pest Management

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Looking at Integrated Pest Management

There is a big buzz about the increasing limitations on chemical usage such as pesticides. For some commodities, there have always been severe limitations. Pest resistance, resurgence and the development and growth of secondary pests into major pests has been an ongoing topic. But there is a solution for dealing with pests on your farm using a method that considers your economic value, the environment and best practice for sustainability.

What does IPM mean?

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a holistic approach to pest management that incorporates various methods to reduce pest populations and minimize the use of pesticides. It is a process that allows you to make the most economical, efficient and sustainable decision to best eradicate or minimize a pest that is causing damage to your crop.

An approach which “means the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimise risks to human health and the environment. IPM emphasises the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agro-ecosystems and encourages natural pest control mechanisms.”  – International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides, FAO.

The practices used in IPM are not new, they have been used for generations before pesticides were developed. Pesticides have been a great help. But with the cost of pesticides and the development of resistance to pesticides is increasing. It is evident that the only way forward is to look at all your options.

Setting up a good IPM program allows you to do just that. Monitoring and managing the pest instead of elimination can reduce costs, preserve the environment, and keep the health of humans, animals and beneficial insects in mind.

How to set up a good IPM plan?
To set up a good IPM plan, you have to look at the 5 main steps to follow:

Monitor the environment
Identify pests that can cause a threat
Assess the possible loss or damage
Implement a treatment strategy
Evaluate the success.

Most of you are not new to farming, some of the orchards are long-standing, and you already have a scouting plan and traps to monitor numbers. You know the pests that are prevalent in your area, when their numbers rise due to favourable weather conditions and which pests to look out for for your specific crops.

The step where we really start making decisions is the assess step. Where we reach certain thresholds. This is a crucial step because this is when you decide where to implement control. Accessing expert advice is crucial here because sometimes a low threshold like 5/ha is enough to take action, and you need to do it quickly.

When you implement a treatment strategy this can be done pre-, during or post-emergence. When managing this pest, you have to take into account the lifecycle of the pest, its naturally occurring enemies, the possible damage or crop loss, and weather conditions.

An IPM plan may be slower in result when compared to immediate eradication with chemicals and be a bit more effort than just a quick spray, but most times, it is more effective and economical in the long run. It is also important to note that a stressed plant attracts pests, and with that being said, plant health plays a crucial role in your pest management scheme.

The following touchpoints are the main control methods used when implementing a treatment strategy:

Cultural control: This includes practices such as maintaining good orchard hygiene, removing and destroying infested fruit, and pruning to improve air circulation. Good soil preparation by creating favourable environments for plants to thrive. Keep in mind good crop rotation when possible, or planting weeds or other plants that repel those pests prevalent in your orchard (intercropping), as well as removing those favourable to those pests to avoid them becoming hosts.

Mechanical/Physical control: Believe it or not, good irrigation practices are seen as a mechanical way to repel pests, for example, aphids and other insects usually feed on the bottom side of the leaf. Adjusting your spray nozzles to a bit of stronger steam when your orchards are mature can dislodge the tiny pests from the leaves. Hand-picking the pests while their numbers are low or when they are in an egg phase or larva phase might cost you some labour costs but will save damage to your crop and save you on chemical costs. Traps are not just used for monitoring but to lure the pest away from the crop. You can also establish barriers, like aluminium foil here and there, to repel aphids.

Biological control: This involves using natural predators such as ladybugs, spiders, lacewings and birds, parasites like parasitic wasps, and pathogens to control pests. They are often common in unsprayed fields for preventative measures.

And yes, when used correctly…

Chemical control: When necessary, the use of pesticides should be minimized and targeted specifically to the pest in question. Care should be taken to ensure that the pesticides used are approved for use in your country and that they are used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. It is recommended to rotate insecticides with different modes of action when controlling pests (See https://irac-online.org/mode-of-action/classification-online/ ). If early season pesticide is required, a seed dressing is often advised over a foliar spray for example to keep an inviting environment for your natural predators to still do their job. Natural enemies can often be promoted by spot spraying and really only spraying when all else fails.

Conclusion
Using chemicals only when necessary, helps to reduce the development of resistance in the pest population and prolongs the efficacy of the insecticides. The rotation frequency will depend on the specific pest population, the severity of the infestation, and the specific orchard environment.

It is equally important to consider the current climate conditions when developing a pest management plan for orchards. Monitoring the weather and the orchard environment can help to predict when pests will be most active and when control measures should be applied.

At the end of the day, it all comes down to cost, the cost of the pest management program should be considered and balanced with the potential economic loss from pest damage.

We recommend consulting with your pest management expert/advisor and monitoring the orchard’s environment and the market situation to make the most appropriate decision to protect the orchard.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Raising the Profile of UK Agriscience in Parliament

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.
This week the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Science & Technology in Agriculture (APPGSTA) hosted an ‘Agri-Science Week in Parliament’ exhibit in the Palace of Westminster.

The multi-partner exhibit, staffed by scientists from Niab, the John Innes Centre, Rothamsted Research, the Roslin Institute and the University of Lincoln, showcased UK taxpayer-funded research and innovation taking place across a range of sectors and technologies, including digital agriculture, robotics, advanced crop and livestock breeding, vertical farming and AI.

The initiative provided a unique opportunity to engage with MPs, Peers and their staff, explaining why agricultural science and technology are so important to all our futures, particularly to a new intake of MPs who may not immediately think of farming innovation as important to them or their constituents.

Niab’s Scott Raffle and Mark Else showcased research from East Malling on water use efficiency, particularly the precision irrigation of strawberry plants, and in controlled environment horticulture with a poster on the development of a nitrogen demand model in raspberries.

APPGSTA chair George Freeman MP and vice-chair Charlie Dewhurst MP were joined by Agriculture Minister Daniel Zeichner MP at the exhibit’s opening ceremony and the launch of a new innovation agenda for UK agriculture from the Group, together with Niab CEO Professor Mario Caccamo and Head of Breeding Dr Phil Howell.

Read the full article here.

Current Status & Control of Take-all Disease in Cereals

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Take-all was seemingly quite bad last year (2024). Current data on Latitude is quite outdated and there are no updated figures on the efficacy of Latitude. So, what is the current status of take-all and available control?

Highlights

  • Warmer and wetter conditions as a result of climate change may increase take-all severity and frequency
  • As varietal and chemical options to control take-all are limited, current strategies focus on an integrated approach where possible. These strategies relate to rotation, cultivation, varieties, drilling dates, seed rates/treatment, and nitrogen applications.
  • Current scientific research focuses on small-scale field trials and laboratory experiments to understand take-all mechanisms, forming the basis for resistance breeding and other solutions.

Take-all background information

Take-all is a soilborne disease in UK cereals, particularly UK winter wheat and to a lesser extent winter barley. Take-all is caused by two strains: the common Gaeumannomyces tritici and the rarer Gaeumannomyces avenae. The disease begins as soil-borne but spreads root-to-root. Take-all cause roots to become blackened, rotten and have a ‘rat-tail’ appearance. The reduction in root activity restricts water and nutrient uptake. This slows canopy growth and causes yellowing and stunting in severe cases. Patches of stunted plants and whiteheads (bleached ears) form. As a result, the fungus reduces yield and grain quality, with average yield losses of 5–20%; though more than half of a crop can be lost when take-all is severe. Take-all is the major cause of ‘second wheat syndrome’ when yields of second wheat crops are frequently 10–15% less than those of first wheats.1

Take-all is challenging to control, as fungicides and varietal resistance are very limited. The seed treatment, Latitude, is currently the only crop protection product approved for used on the impact of take-all. The disease is very soil dependent, for example the disease is more prone in crops grown on Wick Soil Series than Hanslope Series, for example. Wick Soil Series is typically a light, sandy or loamy soil with good drainage but low water and nutrient retention. The lighter soil facilitates the spread of the fungus easily, and the loss of active roots has a large effect on crop water and nutrient uptake where there is already low water/nutrient retention of the soil. Contrarily, the Hanslope Series is typically heavy clay soils with a greater water holding capacity, which retains nutrients.2 Additionally, take-all thrives in alkaline soils, though acidic patches can also suffer damage.1 The unclear boundaries of how and where take-all is most damaging contributes to the challenges of trying to reduce its effect and manage future outbreaks.

Warm soil temperatures in the autumn (above 10–12°C) promote take-all activity, and a wet spring can exacerbate its spread. Considering the recent weather changes as a result of climate change, this may indicate that take-all may become more prevalent as we experience these warmer and wetter conditions. Additionally, moist soil conditions can build up take-all inoculum, impacting subsequent crops to a greater extent.

Current control/recommendations

As varietal and chemical options to control take-all are limited, current strategies focus on an integrated approach where possible, the main strategies provided by AHDB include:

1. Rotation

  • One-year break crops not susceptible to the disease can prevent take-all inoculum build up in the soil, reducing its impact on a subsequent cereal crop. The bigger the rotation, the less impact take-all will have on the future cereal crop. Broad-leave crops and oats are particularly useful in reducing take-all inoculum in the soil because they encourage antagonistic soil fungi to supress the take-all inoculum, a ‘fungi family feud’, as some are calling it.
  • Volunteer cereals and/or grassweeds can harbour the disease in break crops, so they require early destruction to reduce the risk of take-all on the following crop.

2. Cultivations

  • Firm seedbed discourages disease growth. Though compaction can hinder root growth in heavy clay soils.
  • Ploughing can bury take-all to deeper depths, allowing the crop time to establish before the roots reach lower depths and any take-all infected soil.
  • Delayed sowing in colder soils can help mitigate the risk, considering take-all thrives in warmer soils.

3. Drilling dates

  • Crops drilled later tend to develop root systems in cooler soils where fungal spread is slower. This leaves time for roots become more established before disease pressure builds. This encompasses trade-offs though, relating to a decrease in yield potential due to a potentially shorter growing season or an increased risk of planting in wet conditions, which may hinder crop establishment.

4. Seed rate/treatments

  • Take-all can become more severe with higher seed rates because of the increased root density of many seedlings, but a lower seed rate may not be practical.
  • Latitude seed treatment is currently the only chemical option to treat take-all.

5. Varieties

  • Some wheat varieties have shown greater yield improvements and response to the addition of Latitude. For example, the 2022 ADAS field trial evaluating the efficacy of Latitude on managing take-all across different wheat varieties (Extase, Zyatt, Dawsum and Palladium) showed that Extase had a higher yield increase (1.85 t/ha) compared to Palladium (0.9 t/ha), both compared to untreated controls.

6. Nitrogen applications

  • An early application of nitrogen followed by the main application later in the growing season to crops more at risk of take-all can be beneficial, compared to one main application at the start. This is because a diseased crop may be less efficient at taking up nitrogen, so little and often is a better approach.

Looking forward, what are the potential options?

From this recent review of the literature and advice presently available, the best advice to control take-all is using an integrated approach of the strategies already discussed above. However, there are new glimmers of hope in terms of alternative approaches to controlling take-all, which we should keep an eye on for future, commercial developments.

  • Biological Control Using Bacillus subtilisA study in China in 2023 has demonstrated that certain strains of Bacillus subtilis can effectively combat take-all disease in wheat. These beneficial bacteria produce antimicrobial proteins that inhibit the growth of the pathogen Gaeumannomyces graminis tritici. Field experiments have shown that applying these strains can reduce disease incidence.
  • A biological fungicide, TOLTEK by Certis Biologicals, has been approved for use in France on Wheat and other cereal crops in 2024. The product contains a bacterial strain that has demonstrated effective antagonistic affects against take-all, thus providing protection against the disease. UK product registration is ongoing (as of Jan 2025), until which time the trials data for the product is not yet available.
  • As the ADAS trial in 2022 showed, certain wheat varieties may have a more effective response to the seed treatment, Latitude. Whilst this study took place in 2022, a more recent news article on take-all in late 2024 still references this key field trial, suggesting its relative importance still. Chloe Francis, Senior Consultant in Plant Pathology at ADAS, shared that there are other seed treatments being investigated, but they have not been registered yet. Chloe also said that applications of the foliar fungicide, Amistar, have been reported to influence take-all but the effect is often quite small and inconsistent. The Amistar label explains that it can reduce the severity of take-all. Note, on cereal crops, Amistar must always be used in mixture with another product.
  • Rothamsted Research are investigating crop genetics, specifically resistant gene varieties to take-all. One wheat line has been evaluated under field conditions and was found to display good resistance to take-all, but it is a low yielding crop and is not a commercial cultivar. Whilst the exact genes that display resistance are still unknown, commercial breeders can start to take this information to cross the traits with commercial wheat cultivars in a breeding program. This may take 5-7 years. This is not seemingly a priority for breeders, because take-all can be depleted within one year.
  • A 2023 study suggests that there is a non-harmful relative of the take-all fungus which cannot penetrate crop roots and therefore does not cause the same level of damage as take-all. Infecting roots with this fungal relative could reduce the effects of take-all due to species competition. A further study in 2024, understanding the mechanisms behind take-all resistance, suggests that the non-harmful relative of the take-all fungus promotes the crops defence mechanisms, helping to reduce the effects of take-all.

Concluding remarks

Latitude continues to be a relatively effective seed treatment in response to take-all, but with warmer and wetter winters because of climate change, we may see a decline in its efficacy. Utilising multiple integrated management strategies and reducing reliance on a single chemical control method for reducing take-all offers significant advantages in terms of risk management.

The current scientific literature focuses on a combination of small-scale field trials and laboratory experiments to study resistant take-all gene expression, with the primary aim of understanding the mechanisms behind take-all. These small-scale experimental phases are crucial for unravelling the mechanisms of take-all, forming the foundation for breeding strategies targeting resistance and other effective solutions.

There does not seem to be any other treatments available or upcoming, except for TOLTEK, with no widely available data to support claims at present (due to ongoing regulation/registration in the UK). However, the foundational concept of TOLTEK as a biological fungicide is supported by the wider scientific literature, suggesting that some soil bacterial strains can have an antagonistic effect on take-all, thus helping to reduce its negative impact on crop growth.

References

  1. Take-all disease in cereals: prevent, detect, control | AHDB
  2. LandIS – Land Information System – Cranfield Environment Centre
  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

New sequenced genome sheds light on weed resistance

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Genomic advances reveal how similar weeds can dominate wheat fields that are geographically separated by over 5,000 miles.

Two new Alopecurus genomes have been sequenced, providing important additions to the growing body of community resources for weed genomics.

Access to the genomes for blackgrass and orange foxtail, sometimes called shortawn foxtail, will help researchers address what makes these weeds such exceptional survivors in modern agricultural systems.

The sequencing of the orange foxtail genome, which was carried out at the Earlham Institute, generated 11.7 million PacBio HiFi reads – nearly 230 Gb of data – corresponding to a haploid genome coverage of 32.9x.

Both blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) and orange foxtail (Alopecurus aequalis) are native to many regions across the Northern Hemisphere.

Blackgrass has become the predominant agricultural weed in Western European winter wheat and barley, whereas orange foxtail has emerged as the dominant agricultural weed for similar crops in parts of China and Japan.

Both are grass weeds that grow in grass crops. They frequently out-compete cereal crops.

Changes in cropping practices have not been effective in controlling the weeds, and both have evolved resistance to multiple herbicides.

With both weeds presenting a major threat to crop yields and food security, a better understanding of the genetic drivers of their resistances and resiliencies are essential to generate effective strategies for control. Filling this knowledge gap requires high-quality genomic resources.

n December 2023, an annotated blackgrass genome was published by Rothamsted, Clemson University, and Bayer scientists. The blackgrass seeds were from a population collected in 2017 from the Broadbalk long-term experiment that had never been treated with herbicides and so remained susceptible to chemical control.

Comparing this population with resistant populations from other UK fields enabled these researchers to identify genetic mechanisms correlated with resistance.

Now, one year later, an annotated orange foxtail genome has been published. For this genome, Rothamsted researchers collaborated with partners at the Earlham Institute and the European Reference Genome Atlas (ERGA) initiative, which ultimately aims to provide reference genomes for all European species.

The orange foxtail plants sequenced were from seeds held by Kew’s Millennium Seed Bank from a UK-collected population.

As orange foxtail is not present in the UK’s agroecosystem, it is unlikely they have ever been exposed to herbicides.

As with the Broadbalk seeds, this genome is an important reference as it will not have been influenced by the strong selective pressures that have shaped some weed populations.

The orange foxtail genome at 2.83 Gb is smaller than the blackgrass genome (3.572 Gb) and contained just over 33,750 protein-coding genes. The genome is assembled into a total of seven chromosome-level scaffolds, and most are complete with telomere sequences on one or both ends.

The sequencing, assembly, and analysis of the orange foxtail grass were carried out by teams in both the Earlham Institute’s Faculty and its National Bioscience Research Infrastructure in Transformative Genomics, both supported by BBSRC.

Read the full article here

Opportunity: UK to India Agri-TechE Accelerator Programme 2025

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The UK Agri-TechE Centre will spearhead a UK to India knowledge exchange initiative in 2025, promoting collaboration in targeted, late-stage R&D, new investment and market access for innovative agricultural technologies. Partnering with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO), UK Science and Innovation Network (SIN), Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and Department for Business and Trade (DBT), the programme aims to enhance collaboration and access to agricultural innovation across UK and India, supporting on-farm sustainability and profitability and agri-tech sector growth.

More information here

 

Applications are due on the 10th February 2025.

Ceres Agri-TechE and the University of Lincoln showcase Agri-TechE Innovation in Parliament

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Cambridge Enterprise initiative Ceres Agri-TechE and the University of Lincoln partner to showcase innovative agri-tech solutions from university science addressing global challenges

Ceres Agri-TechE and University of Lincoln have partnered to present Agri-TechE Innovation as part of an Agri-Science Week in Parliament exhibit on 27-31 January. The team will share highlights from the Ceres Agri-TechE programme that is translating world-class UK university science into real world impact.

Initially funded in 2018 by a £4.8M Research England CCF award as a collaboration between the University of Cambridge, University of Lincoln, University of Reading, University of Hertfordshire and the University of East Anglia, Ceres Agri-TechE Knowledge Exchange Partnership (Ceres Agri-Tech), is a collaborative initiative founded by and located at Cambridge Enterprise, the innovation arm of the University of Cambridge. Ceres Agri-TechE builds upon Cambridge Enterprise’s world class track record in research translation, helping underpin food security, reducing environmental impacts and increasing the sustainability of agriculture.

Supported by grants from Research England’s Connecting Capability Fund and EPSRC Place Based Impact Accelerator Account, to date Ceres Agri-TechE has launched four agri-tech spinouts, which together have created 29 high-value jobs and are developing innovative agri-tech solutions for critical challenges. These spinouts include:

  • Fruitcast – AI-enabled decision support and fruit forecasting for improved yield optimisation, waste reduction and improved efficiency
  • Agaricus Robotics – intelligent robotic mushroom harvesting
  • Cellexcel – waterproofing biocomposites for lightweighting vehicles

Ceres Agri-TechE has a pipeline of over 40 agri-tech innovations with global potential including direct carbon capture for climate resilience, net zero precision fertiliser and improving crop storage for reduced food waste. The pipeline projects all address UN Sustainability Development Goals, such as zero hunger, clean water (and sanitation), responsible consumption and production and industry, innovation and infrastructure.

It is helping to bring together organisations in the UK and around the world to translate leading university science into real-world solutions, with 28 new collaborations, 8 UK civic partners, 30 international partners and 26 farmer partners. Ceres Agri-TechE has leveraged £6.07 million so far and supported the training of more than 380 academics, helping the continued pipeline and positive impact of agri-tech research innovation.

Since 2018, Ceres Agri-TechE has worked closely with university partners Cambridge, Lincoln and UEA, as well as local civic societies, businesses, farmers and growers in the region’s agri-tech cluster. In 2023 Ceres Agri-TechE announced two further formal collaborations.

Led by the University of Lincoln, with the Cambridge University Department of Engineering and Ceres Agri-Tech, Lincam is a collaborative initiative to deliver agri-tech impact in the Greater Lincolnshire and North Cambridgeshire (Lincam) region, funded by a £4.9m Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Place Based Impact Acceleration Account. Already a nationally renowned agri-tech cluster this funding is driving the Lincam region to become an agri-tech gateway for the world – enabling the development of technologies at industrial scale and providing export opportunities for agri-tech companies and inward investment opportunities within both the agri-tech and primary production sectors.

Ceres Agri-TechE is also collaborating with Universities of Lincoln (lead), Cambridge and UEA to develop a truly global Agri-TechE cluster in the Greater Lincolnshire and East Anglia region with £1.49m from Research England’s Connecting Capability Fund (CCF) RED fund. Agri-TechE Global is a designed to translate agri-tech research from the Universities of Lincoln, Cambridge and UEA and build international academic and commercial links to support the onward development and commercialisation of their agri-tech innovations.

Ceres Agri-TechE is a testament to the power of innovation and collaboration, and the positive impact of publicly-funded research. By bridging the gap between research and real-world application, Ceres Agri-TechE is paving the way for a more sustainable, efficient, and resilient agricultural sector.

Dr Louise Sutherland, Director of Ceres Agri-Tech, said:

“Ceres Agri-TechE is a crucial link that enables world-leading University research from the UK to solve global challenges facing agriculture, driving sustainability across the environment and lives. Our work is having tangible impacts in the UK and worldwide and showcases the incredible potential of collaboration and publicly funded research to drive positive change.”

Professor Simon Pearson, Founding Director of Lincoln Institute of Agri-Food Technology (LIAT), University of Lincoln, said: “There is little doubt that the UK is a world leader in the diverse set of interdisciplinary sciences that underpin agriculture and food production. Ceres Agri-TechE focuses on the key challenge of translating this science from university labs to farmers’ fields. The Ceres Agri-TechE programme is now proven generating Lincoln’s first spin-outs and high quality jobs that support the national and local economy. Lincoln are proud to be one of the initial partners of Ceres Agri-Tech.”

Prof Julian Blow, PVC Research and Innovation, University of East Anglia, said:

“As leaders in agri-food research and innovation, we recognise the benefit that the Ceres Agri-TechE partnership has brought to our institution. The agri-tech specific support through Ceres Agri-TechE has proven to be an efficient model for fast-tracking the commercialisation of early-stage agri-tech arising from our research. A number of UEA academics have benefited from the process which has sharpened their understanding of pitching, market needs and developing commercial plans. Ceres Agri-TechE compliments UEA’s ambitious research, innovation and civic strategies, and our vision to solve the challenges of our changing world by working together sustainably.”

 

Soil sampling vs soil station data

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Soil analysis is a valuable tool in agriculture for selecting suitable crops, assessing soil fertility, and providing fertiliser recommendations. To obtain reliable information, it is necessary to take representative soil samples and analyze the soil using methods calibrated with fertiliser trials in the respective region. On the other hand, it has long been observed by several researchers that, under sufficient soil moisture conditions, soil electrical conductivity (EC) describes plant growth conditions well or even better than soil analyses. However, correlations between EC and nutrient levels found in soil analyses have been inconsistent.

Macronutrients in soil

The main macronutrients in soil, which are determined through analyses, include nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), which are required in large quantities by plants. Secondary macronutrients like calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) are also important, but deficiencies and the need for their addition are less common in crop cultivation. Typically, soil analyses are conducted in early spring, when the level of nitrate (NO3), the most crucial plant-available form of nitrogen, is low in the soil. The total nutrient content in soil is much greater than the portion available to plants. For instance, potassium makes up approximately 1% of the world’s soils (as referenced in Soil Chemistry by H.L. Bohm, B.L. McNeal, and G.A. O’Connor, John Wiley & Sons, 2001), but the plant-available fraction in soil tests is around 100-200 mg/kg, which is only 1-2% of the total K content.

Soil sampling: how and what is measured

The same principle applies to all plant nutrients. Therefore, laboratory methods have been developed to specifically determine the plant-available nutrients, and these methods are validated through fertilisation trials. In Europe alone, 12 different soil analysis methodologies are used, employing various extraction solutions, meaning that results obtained from different laboratories are not directly comparable. During these analyses, a specific amount of extraction solution (e.g., Mehlich 3, AL, DL) is added to the soil, shaken for a set period, and the nutrients extracted into the solution are measured. Standard spring soil analyses (required every 5 years) typically measure K, P, as well as Mg and Ca content in mg/kg.

The role of electrical conductivity in soil data

Plant nutrition occurs through the water present in the soil, where nutrients are dissolved. This is the medium from which plants directly absorb nutrients through their roots. Dissolved ions in soil water cause electrical conductivity, and the total amount of ions can be universally estimated by measuring the electrical conductivity of a saturated soil extract, which is the Paul-Tech nutrient indicator. Phosphorus is usually strongly bound to soil particles in a non-water-soluble form, so its movement is not reflected in electrical conductivity. Key cations like K+, Mg++, and Ca++ are more or less bound to the soil structure (negatively charged colloid particles) through the cation exchange capacity (CEC) phenomenon.

Whether or not these exchangeable cations dissolve in soil water or sit on exchange sites, depends on many factors, particularly soil texture (the clay content, which determines the CEC value), organic matter content, temperature, soil moisture, and more. For example, it is known that K+ ions bind relatively quickly and strongly to soil particles, and this process is also influenced by winter freezing-thawing cycles, which is reflected in Paul-Tech’s nutrient value. The strength of cation binding to the soil matrix determines their leaching potential; for example, soils with higher clay and/or humus content (higher CEC) have little risk of K leaching, whereas sandy soils (low CEC) are at higher risk.

In traditional soil analyses, the total pool of potentially plant-available nutrients is determined using extraction solutions, whereas the Paul-Tech system measures in real time the sum of nutrients currently available to plants in the soil solution.

Summary:

  • The total nutrient content in soil is 10 to 100 times greater than the portion that is plant-available (the part that influences plant growth).
  • In soil laboratory analyses, nutrients are extracted from the soil using different extraction solutions, and it is unclear, and may vary over time, how much of the nutrients obtained in these analyses (the total soil nutrient content) are currently available to plants. The analysis methods are calibrated with fertilisation trials and are specific to the local context.
  • Plant nutrition occurs through the soil water solution. Measuring electrical conductivity and calculating nutrients from this in the Paul-Tech system describes the real situation in the soil water near the root zone (and not the extraction solution) in real time.
  • For long-term soil fertility management, the laboratory analyzes using extractant solution is essential as it shows the total nutrient reserve, even those not immediately available.
  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Introducing ActivatedAir™

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Zayndu recently produced a video explaining its groundbreaking ActivatedAirTM seed priming technology, which we wanted to share to help growers understand its benefits.

Shot on location at its UK headquarters at the Advanced Technology Innovation Centre in Loughborough, the video features members of the Zayndu team discussing every aspect of ActivatedAirTM.

Zayndu CEO Ralph Weir introduces ActivatedAirTM by saying it helps produce bigger, stronger and healthier plants without artificial chemicals by encouraging the seed to utilise its resources better.

At the heart of the Z-Series plasma seed treatment machine is a plasma generator using high-voltage electricity to expose seeds to an environment similar to a lightning strike, said James Seaman, director of engineering at Zayndu.

One of the key features of the machine is its simple user interface. 

“We don’t want our customers spending lots of time upskilling and training their operators. We want the machines to be used out of the box with minimal skill required,” said James.

The plasma treatment removes the external waxes on the seed surface, increasing the water permeability of the seeds and enabling them to absorb water more efficiently, explained Dr Alberto Campanaro, head of plant science at Zayndu.

This produces faster germination, which, so far, Zayndu’s plant science team has tested around 130 varieties spanning 50 plant species.

“Generally speaking, what we see in terms of yield increase from using the ActivatedAirTM technology is somewhere in the region of 20%, up to 30%,” Alberto added.

What does this mean for a grower in practical terms?

“Vertical farmers find ActivatedAirTM particularly attractive because of the decreased (crop) cycle time,” said Nathanael Dannenberg, sales manager at Zayndu. “It means their crop under lights for less time, which makes their operational costs lower per cycle.”

Similarly, greenhouse growers can increase output by running more crop cycles per year, maximising their growing space, continued Nathanael.

In conclusion, Ralph added that ActivatedAirTM enables growers to lower their cost of production, increase their output, and deliver better crops without using artificial chemicals.

“It’s a very exciting proposition for a grower.”

Contact the Zayndu team via LinkedIn or the Zayndu website to learn more.

January 2025 Business Update: Deliverables from Ceres Research

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Since Dr Alex Setchfield and Dr Danni Roche joined in October 2024, the Ceres Research team has been able to meet the growing demand for independent agricultural research and knowledge exchange within the sector. In our first business update, we bring you the latest activities and deliverables from Ceres Research.  

Deliverables: 

  • Research and Development: Collaborative partnerships and expert project management, including developing a circular economy-based R&D project linking arable and poultry farming, with multiple stakeholders. 
  • Analysis and Review: Comprehensive impact analyses and market studies to detailed policy reviews and strategic consultancy, such as a bi-annual farming update being prepared for institutional landowners to send out to tenants. 
  • Industry Intelligence: Targeted farmer surveys, focus groups and practical field-based analysis, including a farmer survey understanding nature recovery and floodplain management on-farm, and breaking news on the first instance of glyphosate resistance in Italian ryegrass in the UK. 
  • Technical Training and Events: Training programmes, engaging events, and expert-led presentations, including farm cluster event organisation and a technical review of harvest 2024 (more detail below). 

Ceres Research Technical Event
The first technical event was held at the end of 2024 at the Young Farmers Club in Essex. The event provided a deep dive into what had worked and what hadn’t during harvest 2024. We also explored what can be done to improve productivity in the face of climate change moving into harvest 2025 and beyond. You can read the full article from this event, with the resources attached, here: Reflect and Project: A Harvest 2024 Review – Ceres Research. 

Corporate Memberships 

Ceres Research is delighted to have joined Agri-TechE  and UK Agri-TechE Centre as a corporate member in 2024, bringing together organisations across agriculture, technology and science. This membership will help Ceres Research to connect with industry pioneers and cutting-edge technology developers to expand our data-driven insights and actionable solutions on farm. We will continue to provide updates on future projects that result from these valuable connections. 

Sector Engagement and Knowledge Exchange 

Amongst many of the critical conferences attended late last year and early this month (such as the Institute of Agricultural Management, British Crop Protection Council Diseases Review, CLA East Roadshow the Oxford Farming Conference and the AICC Industry Day), Ceres Research was also delighted to be invited to sponsor the British Society of Soil Science Early Career members event in Cardiff, focused on careers in the soil-related industry in December 2024. Dr Danni Roche also presented some of her work on biostimulants and their potential impacts on soil health at the AHDB Agronomy Conference. The full conference was recorded and is available here. 

We are looking forward to the year ahead, especially harnessing the skills and expertise of our newly formed team as we continue to advance research and knowledge exchange in the agricultural sector. 

If you come across something interesting you hear from us or have a collaboration idea, let us know! We’d love to continue maximising our opportunities through Agri-TechE .

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Bayer and Ecospray Reach Distribution Agreement for New Garlic-Sourced Biological Crop Protection Product

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Bayer to distribute Ecospray’s new liquid nematicide with their exclusive brand, Velsinum™, across Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Africa starting in 2026 / Velsinum will increase access to biological alternatives for vegetable and potato operations in the European Union

Velsinum will increase access to biological alternatives for vegetable and potato operations.

Bayer today announced that the company has signed a new exclusive distribution agreement with UK-based Ecospray to market a biological liquid nematicide sourced from garlic. The product presents a biological alternative to traditional synthetic chemical nematicides in vegetable and potato crops, and will be marketed in the European Union under the new name Velsinum™.

“Farmers in the EU are in desperate need of new, effective solutions against pests for their high-value vegetable crops,” said Jens Hartmann, Regional Head for Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) at Bayer’s Crop Science Division. “Velsinum will be a welcome addition into Bayer’s trusted portfolio of biological solutions and technologies supported by innovations like Velum, BioAct, Nematool and Terra MG.”

Nematodes cause over 75 billion euros worth of damage to crops globally each year with all crops facing at least one nematode pest threat. Velsinum will offer growers a new tool against nematode root damage with complementary benefits for both plant and soil health. Plants which can avoid root damage are better able to absorb available nutrients and also can withstand disease and pest pressure overall, all while safekeeping beneficial earthworm populations to maintain soil quality.

Ecospray’s knowledge and expertise of the naturally occurring bioactive compounds contained within garlic has allowed the company to develop effective plant protection products which take advantage of the natural nematicidal properties of garlic extract in order to create safe, effective and zero-residue solutions.

“We are excited to collaborate with Bayer on Velsinum, which is fully compatible with Bayer’s existing biological portfolio,” said Peter McDonald, CEO of Ecospray. “This partnership is a strong endorsement of Ecospray and its R&D capabilities developed over many years. We also greatly appreciate the ongoing support from our existing distributors in Europe Certis Belchim BV and CBC (Europe) SRL., who remain vital to our market development with our legacy product Nemguard.”

Bayer’s partnership with Ecospray continues Bayer’s work to bring new botanical and biological solutions from the open innovation ecosystem to growers, while encouraging diversity in modern agricultural practices and enabling additional regenerative agricultural practices. With Bayer’s trusted brand, global commercialization capabilities, and unparalleled agricultural systems expertise Bayer helps to bring effective biological products to market more quickly.

About Bayer
Bayer is a global enterprise with core competencies in the life science fields of health care and nutrition. In line with its mission, “Health for all, Hunger for none,” the company’s products and services are designed to help people and the planet thrive by supporting efforts to master the major challenges presented by a growing and aging global population. Bayer is committed to driving sustainable development and generating a positive impact with its businesses. At the same time, the Group aims to increase its earning power and create value through innovation and growth. The Bayer brand stands for trust, reliability and quality throughout the world. In fiscal 2023, the Group employed around 100,000 people and had sales of 47.6 billion euros. R&D expenses before special items amounted to 5.8 billion euros. For more information, go to www.bayer.com.

About Ecospray
Ecospray Limited, a UK-based biopesticide company, specializes in creating garlic extract-based solutions with global registrations. Known for its residue-free products, it is a preferred choice among growers. With the tagline “Nature Defined, Technically Refined,” Ecospray is dedicated to advancing naturally derived crop protection technologies through ongoing research and development.

The company offers growers reliable, effective, and eco-friendly tools for managing pest and crop health challenges, while ensuring high crop quality and promoting sustainable farming practices. Ecospray’s commitment to innovation ensures its solutions meet the evolving needs of farmers around the world. For more information, visit www.ecospray.com.

UK supply chains get safeguarding boost from BBSRC

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) awards £13 million to make UK supply chains more resilient.

Queen’s University Belfast has been awarded £5 million to create a new network plus for reimagining supply chains in food, fashion and critical minerals.

An additional £7.25 million has been shared among five research projects focused on strengthening the UK’s food system.

New centre for reimagining supply chains

The ReImagining Supply Chains Network Plus (RiSC+) will bring together experts from academia, industry and government to map out potential supply chain disruptions and find ways to respond effectively.

By modelling possible disruptions and testing responses, RiSC+ aims to build resilience into supply chains across different sectors.

RiSC+ will focus on developing advanced digital tools, such as “digital twins” (virtual models of real-world systems), along with foresight studies to anticipate and prepare for future risks.

Tackling shared challenges

Working closely with various stakeholders, it will tackle shared challenges that affect all supply chains, such as:

  • just-in-time production
  • labour and logistics bottlenecks
  • complex risk factors

RiSC+ will be structured around three core streams of activity:

  • network plus activities, which include sandpits, knowledge exchange sessions, scoping exercises, challenge and solution sprints, and foresighting workshops to gather insights and intelligence
  • supply chain modelling, guided by working groups in food, critical minerals, fashion and the supply chain modelling team
  • flexible fund, which will offer open opportunities for research activities, innovation programmes, travel grants and more

Three key supply chains in focus

The work will zero in on three supply chains critical to the UK:

  • food: with risks from extreme weather and rising energy costs, food supply chains are vulnerable to shortages that could affect the UK population
  • critical minerals: growing competition for resources, as well as shortages of essential materials like construction supplies and semiconductors, highlight the need for a more secure supply chain
  • fashion: reduced availability of synthetic materials and dyes due to petrochemical shortages, combined with fast-changing consumer demand, puts strain on the fashion industry

By analysing these sectors, RiSC+ will help develop strategies to:

  • minimise disruptions
  • consider trade-offs across the economy
  • create solutions that strengthen resilience

Building resilience in the UK’s food system

Five research projects are also being funded to secure the UK’s food system from risks like geopolitical instability and climate change.

These projects will look at innovative ways to make food supply chains more resilient:

  • University of Surrey led by Dr Zoe M Harris: investigating vertical farming to boost the supply of leafy greens in the UK
  • University of Southampton (TRI SOME CHICKEN project) led by Professor Emma Roe: examining the impacts of industrialised food production on communities, animals and the environment
  • Anglia Ruskin University led by Professor Aled Jones: identifying weak points in the UK food system and developing strategies to avoid potential crises
  • University of Reading led by Professor Tom Oliver: analysing risks in the production, supply and consumption of fruits and vegetables to find the best interventions
  • University of Cambridge (RASCAL project) led by Dr Jagjit Singh Srai: studying the balance between UK food production and imports, especially in light of disruptions caused by economic, political or climate factors

Together, these initiatives will make the UK’s supply chains more robust.

They will also help secure essential resources and food supplies for the future, ensuring that the UK is better prepared for unexpected challenges.

Read the Full Article here

Managing and protecting biodiversity crucial for a sustainable future

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Agriculture is a cornerstone of human civilisation, providing the food and resources necessary for survival. However, the intensification of agricultural practices has led to significant environmental challenges, including the loss of biodiversity.

“Agricultural landscapes are increasingly under pressure from intensive farming practices, which often lead to habitat loss, soil degradation and a decline in biodiversity,” says Francis Dodds, Editorial Director at Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing.

“This reduction in biodiversity can have profound impacts on key ecosystem services, such as pollination, pest control and nutrient cycling, which are essential for agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability,” he adds.

In the face of escalating environmental challenges, the importance of managing and protecting biodiversity in agriculture has never been more critical and the timely publication of a new book epitomises this fact.

Managing biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: Conservation, restoration and rewilding brings together a host of international experts in conservation biology and ecological restoration from Africa, Europe, North America and Oceania to highlight the current biodiversity threat, as well as how agriculture can contribute to improving biodiversity in farmland and other agricultural settings.

Agri-environment schemes (AES) have emerged as vital tools in promoting biodiversity conservation within agricultural landscapes and encompass a range of policies and programs designed to incentivise farmers to adopt environmentally friendly practices.

In North America, AES have been instrumental in addressing the negative externalities of agriculture, such as pollution and habitat destruction, whereas in Australia and Europe the focus of these schemes has been on reforestation and the restoration of native vegetation and peatlands.

Although extremely promising, AES face their own challenges, including the need for better coordination amongst stakeholders and the integration of scientific knowledge into policy and practice.

Another area that shows great promise is animal rewilding – a conservation practice which involves the introduction of native species into their historical habitats with the aim of restoring natural processes and ecological functions.

Case studies from Australia and New Zealand showcase the reintroduction of endangered species, such as the stitchbird (hihi Notiomystis cincta) and the South Island takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) and their role in the recovery of key ecological functions, such as seed dispersal, pollination and nutrient recycling.

“Agricultural landscapes have the potential to bring people and nature together in ways that support human wellbeing and sustain valuable biodiversity,” says Professor Saul Cunningham, Australian National University, Australia.

“This edited volume brings together an outstanding selection of experts to help us to understand how it is possible to get better outcomes for nature and people, considering principles practice and policy,” he concludes.

Protecting biodiversity is not just an environmental responsibility, but a practical approach to ensuring the long-term sustainability and productivity of agricultural systems.

*Agri-TechE members can redeem 20% off this title – plus 150+ more – by entering code AGRITECH at checkout via www.bdspublishing.com

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.