The Productive Landscape: NatureTech for Profit and Planet
How can technology enable delivery of food, nature recovery, and climate resilience - all at once? The Head of the Environment Agency is asked: what's the national plan for dealing with land use pressures, plus you’ll hear from technologists and land managers working on nature-based and tech-enabled solutions for water, soils and climate adaptation.

Yield and maturity considerations for growers planting winter beans this spring

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The Processors and Growers Research Organisation (PGRO) has received a flood of calls from farmers who have winter seed sat in sheds after abandoning drilling last autumn.

While seed can be sown, research shows that rates should be increased to counter the yield impact, and that maturity will take up to 12 days longer in Eastern England.

The PGRO is re-issuing its advice to growers in light of the recent bad weather that has caused major disruption to farms across the UK.

Throughout October and November high levels of rainfall led to rivers overtopping and flood defences being breached, leaving tens of thousands of acres of farmland under water, sometimes washing away newly-sown crops.

This major disruption has caused the drilling of winter beans to be delayed or abandoned entirely, leaving frustrated growers with stockpiles of winter bean seed in their sheds.

Field trials in this area were last carried out in 2013 following an autumn characterised by torrential rain.

Principal Technical Officer Stephen Belcher drilled winter beans in the spring with four populations planted at three sites on three different sowing dates.

The trials work indicated that winter beans at 18 plants/m2 could be grown when planted in the spring, but on average the crop suffered a 34% yield reduction compared to when sown in the autumn.

The yield penalty was reduced to 18% by doubling the seed rate to 36-40 plants/m2.

Spring-sown winter beans also matured between 7 and 12 days later than autumn-sown seed.

Stephen said: “The autumn of 2023 has been extremely challenging for arable farmers and opportunities for fieldwork have been limited, resulting in many crops – including beans – being left unplanted.

“The situation has prompted many calls to the PGRO regarding the viability of using winter bean seed in the spring, and it is absolutely a viable option for growers, but they should expect a lower yield and later maturity than if autumn sown.

“Based on the work carried out in this area, our guidance is to treat the crop very much like a spring bean and to increase the plant population to around 36-40 plants/m2.”

For more information on drilling winter beans in the spring, you can visit PGRO website or read the original article from The Pulse magazine here.

For additional information and advice you can call PGRO on 01780 782585.

Agri-TechE goes Back to the Future

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

To mark the 10th anniversary of Agri-TechE we’re proud to release our “Back to the Future” report, capturing insights from more than 70 contributors across our diverse membership.

Innovative farmers, researchers, tech developers, investors, and business services have reflected on a decade of technological advances and shared their visions for the years ahead.

While our contributors celebrate breakthroughs that have “changed the game,” they also identified emerging challenges, from shifting investment landscapes to regulatory hurdles alongside “calls-to-arms” for transformative industry action.

Our experts provided a rich and complex set of insights, offering a blueprint of what’s needed to sustain – and accelerate – agri-tech innovation. Our findings underscore the need for a refreshed government agri-tech strategy to build on the momentum of the past decade.

Our Back to the Future Report is just the beginning — our contributors’ insights offer a glimpse of the innovation still to come.

 

We invite you to explore individual submissions made via podcast and written articles. We have included each here to enable you to access their views directly and in more detail.

Listen to podcast episodes below.

They are also available on Spotify, Deezer, Apple Podcasts, YouTube Music, Amazon Music, Samsung, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Or watch the videos on the YouTube playlist:

AbacusBio: Making Data-Based decisions

ADAS: Practical Implementation of Disruptive Innovation

Aethr Associates: ESG and Sustainability

The AF Group Limited: No Such Thing as a Typical Farmer

AgRecruit: Finding the Right People

Agrimetrics: Data is the Greatest Accelerant in Ag-tech Innovation

Archipelago Technology: Is Printing the Future for Agri-tech

ARU Writtle: Collaboration to Enable Change

Barenbrug: The Challenge of Futurism with Barenbrug

Ben Burgess: Leveraging Digitisation in Farm Machinery

Better Origin: Achieving the Potential of Insect Rearing

B-hive Innovations Ltd: Integrating Innovation with Existing Practices

Birkett Long: Futureproofing for Innovation

Cambridge Consultants: Cross-Cutting Technologies

CeraPhi Energy: Decarbonising Energy

Citicourt & Co: Agri-TechE Corporate Financing

City College Norwich: Mixing Old Techniques with New Technologies

Cranfield University: Be Inspired by Soils

Delta – T Devices: Environmental Sensing for Agriculture

Eden Search: Agri-TechE Recruitment

eg technology: Understanding Technology Use Cases

Elveden Estate: Putting Data to Work On-Farm

Farmable: Could agri-tech bridge the farming divide?

Frederick Hiam: Avoiding Frustration 101 when Implementing Technology

Future Biogas: Decarbonising Farm Energy

Gardin Ltd: Phenotyping Indoor Crops

Home Farm Nacton: Macro Trends on a Micro Scale

Hutchinsons: The Digitised Agronomist

Innovation Agri-TechE Group: Overcoming Barriers to TCEA Adoption: Lighting, AI, and the Path to Sustainable Farming

Institute of Agricultural Engineers: The Evolution of Farming: Precision Technology and the Role of Agricultural Engineers

Letttus Grow: Back to the Future with lettus Grow

LIC: Livestock Breeding and Improvement

Mills & Reeve: Supply Chain Management

Mishcon de Reya: Driving Innovation in Agri-Tech

MTC: Scaling Agri-TechE Adoption

National Institute of Agricultural Botany (Niab): Genetics, Agronomy and Data

PheroSyn Ltd: Pheromone-Based Integrated Pest Management

Roboscientific: Real-Time Disease Protection

RootWave: Non–Chemical Weed Control

Rothamsted Enterprises: Agri-TechE Innovation and Collaboration

SugaROx: Commercialising Research in Sustainable Biostimulants

Verdesian Europe & Africa: Future-ready agriculture: embracing bio-stimulants

Vitabeam: Improving Yields whilst Killing Pathogens

Wyld Networks Ltd: Harnessing the Power of Connectivity

Yagro Ltd: Shaping the Future of Farming

Rothamsted Research study warns of glyphosate ban trade-offs

Research Digest
Agri-TechE

Glyphosate, renowned for its broad-spectrum efficacy, is the most widely used herbicide in northwest European winter wheat arable systems, contributing to 17% of the herbicide-treated area in the UK.

As debates intensify over its environmental and health impacts, Rothamsted Research’s latest study gives a sobering warning about trade-offs involved in discontinuing glyphosate use, from increased weed burden to reduced crop yields and profitability.

Tractor spraying in a field - glyphosate

Glyphosate’s role in agriculture

This linchpin of arable agriculture controls broadleaved weeds and grasses during fallow periods between crops and before crop emergence. Glyphosate also plays a significant role in regenerative agriculture systems primarily because it facilitates no-till farming practices that minimise soil disturbance.

Despite its effectiveness, glyphosate is a controversial treatment; key concerns include the human health risks as a probable carcinogen, its environmental impact – particularly on aquatic organisms, and the evolution of herbicide resistance in weed species.

Rothamsted Research’s approach to assess impact of ban

The recent study by Rothamsted Research aimed to address the research gap by assessing the potential impacts of discontinuing glyphosate use. It modeled the effects of reducing or removing glyphosate and replacing it with cultural control methods.

The study used the Rothamsted Landscape Model, which generated simulation to compare scenarios with and without glyphosate, as well as scenarios implementing Integrated Weed Management (IWM) practices.

Rothamsted Research study warns of glyphosate ban trade-offs

Rothamsted is the longest running agricultural research station in the world, providing cutting-edge science and innovation for nearly 170 years.
Rothamsted Research undertakes its study at the Centre for Research

A warning about trade-offs

Results indicated that while removing glyphosate led to increased weed abundance and arable plant diversity, it also resulted in decreased food production and profits. However, it also resulted in reduced herbicide risk to the environment.

Alternative strategies such as crop diversification and delayed drilling showed mixed results in mitigating the impacts of glyphosate loss. While some IWM practices demonstrated potential benefits, their effectiveness varied depending on the specific conditions and farm management strategies.

“Findings emphasise the need for careful consideration of trade-offs if a ban were to be enacted,” said Rothamsted’s Dr Helen Metcalfe who led the study.

The study underscores the complexity of agricultural systems and the importance of informed decision-making. In the context of the growing preference for regenerative agriculture, glyphosate’s role is never more important.

As glyphosate remains controversial, this trial’s findings provide valuable perspectives on the need to weigh the trade-offs involved in its use or reduction, and to explore alternative methods to mitigate these challenges effectively.

Read the full article and trial results here.

Agtelligence and Airbus; Unlocking Green Finance for Sustainable Agriculture

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Amidst the escalating recognition of the global imperative to address environmental challenges, green finance has emerged as a compelling tool for propelling sustainable development. It is a pivotal instrument for allocating financial resources towards projects and initiatives to prioritise environmental protection and conservation. High-resolution satellite data, in synergy with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the evolving framework of the Task Force on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD), is fundamentally reshaping the landscape of how we monitor, rigorously assess, and strategically invest in endeavours that champion environmental sustainability.
Agtelligence brings insights into biodiversity and soil health in the agricultural landscape; we do this by AI-driven time series analysis that captures environmental indicators, and we then apply a scoring methodology to simplify the data and make it accessible to all stakeholders via a dashboard or API. This data provision allows corporations to locate, evaluate, assess and disclose their business risks and impacts on nature aligned with global reporting frameworks.

Navigating the Green Finance Landscape:

Before we dive into the pivotal role of high-resolution satellite data within green finance, it’s vital to grasp the intricacies of the green finance landscape. Green finance spans a comprehensive spectrum of financial services and investment opportunities strategically oriented towards projects, activities, and companies deeply committed to environmental sustainability. This encompasses a diverse array of financial instruments, including green bonds, sustainable loans, that require rigorous environmental impact assessments.

The Surging Demand for Green Finance:

Addressing climate change and environmental challenges is accelerating the demand for green finance. As our planet faces increasingly dire consequences, there is a growing recognition that conventional financial practices must align with sustainability objectives. It is also the fastest-growing sector in the financial industry. This transformation has driven a surge in the demand for green finance as individuals, institutions, and governments acknowledge the critical role it plays in addressing the environmental issues of our time. In this context, green finance has evolved beyond a niche market to become a mainstream financial instrument. Investors and financial institutions increasingly integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria into their decision-making processes. Green finance represents a proactive response to climate change, harnessing the power of financial instruments to foster a more sustainable and environmentally responsible global economy.

Green Bonds: Catalysts of Sustainability:

One prominent facet of green finance is the issuance of green bonds. These financial instruments are specially designed to fund projects and initiatives that deliver tangible environmental benefits. Essentially, green bonds are debt securities, much like traditional bonds, but they are exclusively allocated to support environmentally responsible endeavours. This could involve projects spanning sustainable agriculture, conservation initiatives, or biodiversity enhancement. The critical distinction is that the funds raised through green bonds are earmarked for initiatives that contribute to a greener, more sustainable future.
Green bonds operate as a financial instrument aimed at funding environmentally friendly projects. The raised capital must be allocated exclusively to environmentally beneficial projects. Investors purchase these bonds, providing the issuer with funds to undertake green projects. The issuer then pays periodic interest to the investors and repays the initial investment upon maturity. The appeal lies in supporting environmentally sound initiatives while gaining financial returns, aligning investors’ interests with sustainable development goals. Third- party verification ensures transparency and adherence to predefined environmental criteria, assuring investors of the projects’ eco-friendly nature.

Sustainable Loans: Banking on a Green Future:

Sustainable loans are another vital component of green finance. These financial arrangements entail providing loans to businesses and organisations committed to environmentally responsible practices. In essence, they offer a financial incentive for companies to implement sustainable measures. For instance, a business may secure a sustainable loan to improve the sustainability of its operations and manage the land it is responsible for in a way that enhances soil health and biodiversity. The financial institutions offer discounted rates, if the environmental aims are met. The repayment of these loans is typically linked to the achievement of predefined sustainability goals, aligning the financial interest of borrowers with their commitment to environmental stewardship.

Environmental Impact Assessments: Quantifying Green Outcomes:

As green finance matures, so does the importance of rigorous environmental impact assessments. These assessments serve as financial due diligence, offering an in-depth evaluation of a project’s ecological footprint. They quantitatively measure the environmental benefits of a proposed initiative and analyse its potential positive influence on sustainability. Financial institutions, investors, and regulatory bodies rely on these assessments to ensure that green finance investments genuinely advance environmental objectives. By leveraging data and analysis, these assessments play a pivotal role in determining the viability and alignment of projects with the broader goals of green finance.

Sustainable Agriculture and Green Finance

Agriculture uses 40% of the global land surface and stands as a cornerstone within the green finance landscape. The agriculture sector is pivotal in addressing environmental challenges and advancing the cause of ecological sustainability. In this section, we will delve into the intricate relationship between sustainable agriculture and green finance, shedding light on how financial mechanisms support and promote environmentally responsible farming practices.

Sustainable Agriculture: An Environmental Imperative:

Sustainable agriculture is not merely a buzzword but a comprehensive approach to farming that places long-term ecological harmony, resource conservation, and food security at its core. It seeks to meet present agricultural needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Why Sustainable Agriculture Matters in Green Finance:

The significance of sustainable agriculture within the green finance landscape is profound. Conventional agriculture practices, which often involve intensive resource use, monoculture farming, and heavy pesticide and fertiliser application, have been associated with soil degradation, water pollution, and biodiversity loss. In contrast, sustainable agriculture strives to mitigate these environmental challenges by embracing practices that integrate practices that enhance nature.

The scale of climate finance dedicated to sustainable agriculture is growing, yet it remains highly insufficient compared to the need. The Climate Policy Initiative (CPI) reports that the amount of climate finance going to agriculture and forestry pales in comparison to that for energy systems, industry, and transportation. Given the transformative role agriculture and forestry can play in human development and climate mitigation there is an urgent need for increased investment in sustainable agricultural practices.
One of the primary challenges in scaling up finance for sustainable agriculture is the lack of reliable and standardised data. The World Bank emphasises that data gaps in the measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) of climate finance hinder the effectiveness and allocation of funds. These gaps make it difficult for investors to assess the impact of their investments and for governments to formulate policies that effectively channel resources into sustainable practices. Furthermore, the complexity and diversity of the agricultural sector, with its multitude of smallholder farmers and varied ecological conditions, add to the data challenges. Standardising metrics and improving data collection and analysis are crucial steps towards enabling more targeted and effective financing.

Investing in sustainable agriculture has a catalytic effect on other economic sectors and global development. The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) argues that investments in sustainable agriculture can boost economies, particularly in rural areas where agriculture is a primary livelihood. This investment stimulates local economies, creates jobs, and increases resilience to climate change. Moreover, sustainable agricultural practices contribute to several United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including poverty reduction, zero hunger, clean water, and climate action. The ripple effects of such investments extend beyond agriculture, fostering broader economic growth and environmental sustainability. As the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) notes, sustainable agriculture financing is not just about food production; it’s an integral part of a holistic approach to sustainable development. By channelling funds into agriculture and forestry, there is an opportunity to address multiple global challenges simultaneously.

Green Finance’s Role in Promoting Sustainable Agriculture:

Green finance plays a central role in advancing sustainable agriculture by facilitating the flow of capital to projects and initiatives that embody ecologically responsible farming practices. These projects can encompass a wide spectrum, ranging from biodiversity promotion on arable lands to regenerative farming methods and initiatives aimed at reducing the agricultural sector’s carbon footprint.
Financial incentives and access to capital are essential elements that green finance provides to farmers and agribusinesses willing to adopt and scale up environmentally friendly agricultural practices. Such practices often entail efficient water resource management, improved soil health, and sustainable land management. By offering financial support for these endeavours, green finance not only encourages their adoption but also nurtures the cultivation of higher yields and reduced environmental impact.

See more about Agtelligence here

Groundswell 2024 – see us there

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

Groundswell 2024 will demonstrate just how far farming has changed. The Regenerative Agriculture Festival brings together farmers, environmental organisations and others in a productive conversation about sustainable agriculture.

Similar in format to a music festival, the event has many different stages, which are just as likely to feature commercial livestock farmers sharing their migration to Net Zero as evangelistic rewilders!

The event provides a forum to learn about the theory and practical applications of regenerative farming and is hosted by the Cherry family on their farm in Hertfordshire. John and Paul Cherry have farmed for over thirty years, converting their mixed farm to a no-till system in 2010. 

Groundswell 2024 takes place at Lannock Manor Farm, Hertfordshire, SG4 7EE, on the 26th & 27th of June 2024. Tickets go on sale at 10am on 22nd April 2024.

Agri-TechE will have a stand at the festival – number MS 3 which is in the Indoor Marquee Stands East, opposite the food court – and are taking part in the BASIS Knowledge Trail. Visit our stand and fill out a fun questionnaire to collect points! Many of our members will also have a presence – full details below. We look forward to seeing you there.

Groundswell

ADAS: one of the UK’s largest independent providers of agricultural and environmental applied/strategic research and consultancy.

AF Group: one of the UK’s largest agricultural purchasing co-operatives working with thousands of farmers across the UK.

AHDB: a statutory levy board, funded by farmers, growers and others in the supply chain and managed as an independent organisation.

AngloAmerican: producing a low chloride, multi-nutrient fertiliser suitable for organic use that can boost crop yields and aid more sustainable farming.

Barenbrug: a leading grass breeder, producing more than 3,000 tonnes of UK grown grass seed each year, distributed to both amenity and agricultural markets through an efficient network.

Barenbrug at Groundswell 2023
Barenbrug at Groundswell 2023

Birkett Long: specialist lawyers, patent attorneys, IFAs and HR advisers offering the full range of advice.

Brown & Co: leading provider of agency, professional and consultancy services across rural, commercial and residential property, agriculture and the environment.

Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing: providers of a database of curated scientific content to empower the agricultural community to build a sustainable future.

Cranfield University: recognised worldwide by industry, government and academe for its research and teaching in food biosciences, soil, digital and sustainability.

Eurofins AgriGenomics: a genomics services supplier with a wide range of tailored, high throughput genotyping solutions.

FramFarmers: providers of a purchasing, grain marketing and administrative function for 1,250 farming businesses across the UK, acting as an extension to individual farm offices.

Future Biogas: the largest producer of biomethane in the UK. It aims to design and operate the next generation of Anaerobic Digestion plants delivering Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) while helping to decarbonise UK farming.

Hutchinsons: a leading agronomy company with over 200 arable and horticultural agronomists nationwide, providing growers with the highest standards of agronomic advice and an unrivalled range of services.

Map of Ag: the company’s Pure Farming data permissioning platform allows farms and industry to find, access, interoperate, re-use and above all control how and where their data is used.

Niab: a major international centre for plant research, crop evaluation and agronomy – a unique national resource, with nearly 100 years of experience and an internationally recognised reputation for independence, innovation and integrity.

Niab at Groundswell 2023
Niab at Groundswell 2023

PES Technologies: soil health measurement tool provides biological, chemical and physical soil health indicators, including microbial biomass and soil organic matter content, in-field in five minutes, straight to your mobile phone.

Ponda: developing next-generation biomaterials from paludiculture crop typha, with the aim of connecting the creation of healthier textiles for the fashion industry to the urgent need for carbon locking land restoration.

Rothamsted Research: the longest running agricultural research station in the world, providing cutting-edge science and innovation for nearly 170 years.

Savills: a real estate services provider with an international network of more than 600 offices and associates, offering a broad range of specialist advisory, management and transactional services to clients all over the world.

Sentry: one of the largest national farming companies in the UK, with 20,000 hectares of land under cultivation for clients throughout the country, annually growing over 400,000 tonnes of local produce.

SRUC: Scotland’s Rural College provides education, research, and consultancy (through SAC Consulting) to create a natural economy fuelled by responsible use of the world’s natural resources.

Timac Agro: a specialist in plant and animal nutrition with extensive expertise in crop nutrition, soil conditioning and fertiliser efficiency, offering a specific range of fertilisers adapted to local soils and farmers’ needs.

University of Essex: bringing expertise in both plant science and and automation, giving businesses access to world-leading research, unlocking funding opportunities, and providing in-depth, evidence-led business advice.

University of Reading: provides world-class expertise and facilities in agri-tech, encompassing many disciplines across the whole University, with specialisms in crop and livestock science, sustainable land management, international development, and applied economics and marking.

Yagro: creator of a platform and tools with the aim of driving insight and productivity by making cutting edge data and analytics capability broadly available across the agricultural sector.

Groundswell 2022 [credit Groundswell]
Groundswell 2022 [credit: Groundswell]

PGRO alerts growers to SFI’s potential impact on pulse crops

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The Processors and Growers Research Organisation (PGRO) is advising growers who are entering agreements for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) to ensure that they fully understand the potential impact their decisions will have on future pulse crop rotations.

Concerns are growing that well-intentioned SFI agreements could negatively impact future pulse production opportunities. With legumes being included in some SFI options it could mean that they are left in the ground for a number of years – or are very frequently present – increasing the likelihood of soil-borne diseases in future pulse crops.

PGRO has set out a detailed paper written by Dr Becky Howard highlighting some of the potential unintended consequences which it advises all arable farmers to read before embarking on an SFI option. The paper has been published at www.pgro.org.

PGRO CEO Roger Vickers said: “We are not against the Sustainable Farming Incentive – we agree that farmers should be paid for providing positive environmental outcomes.

“But PGRO and others involved in the pulse sector have serious concerns over the impact some options will have on cropping in the long term.”

A number of SFI options encourage the use of either long-term or frequent short-term use of legume species, in either legume-rich ley mixtures or catch and cover crops. Examples include the highly-rewarded NUM3, IPM3, and Countryside Stewardship AB15 options.

Other options are also detracting from more minority crops, in particular Actions for Wildlife AHL 1 and AHL 2.

The potential green bridging effect and risk to future pulse cropping as a result is significant, as disease and pest levels build in the soil, and may seriously impact the viability of pulse crops in the future. A normal, sensible rotation, would not encourage pulses closer than one crop in five, and yet in an SFI scenario soils might easily have almost continuous host legumes present.

Crop protection could also be an issue, Mr Vickers says. “Factoring in that CRD now considers beans to be a major crop and therefore excluded from the EAMU system for agricultural chemical use, and the already minimal portfolio of crop protection products available for pulses in general, this adds to the increasing jeopardy for their future production. Many of the greatest threats are soil borne disease for which there are no seed treatments available.

“These unintended consequences are not certain as insufficient research has been conducted, but are a logical potential outcome based upon life cycle and alternative host considerations.”

The benefits that pulses bring to the rotation have been recognised many times by the government.

Pulses provide nitrogen, and improve soil fertility for the following crops, they have a favourable environmental profile and growing more of them is seen as having huge potential to help reduce carbon emissions from the UK agricultural sector.

“Hence why there are initiatives such as the NCS Project,” Mr Vickers adds. “Growers need to know the possible risks to their pulse-growing capabilities if they do enter an SFI agreement.”

Vertical Future listed as the #1 Controlled-environment-agriculture technology company globally in the “FoodTech 500”

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

UNITED KINGDOM: UK-based CEA technology and data company Vertical Future has been recognised as the number one CEA technology company globally in this year’s FoodTech500, a 35 position rise through the ranks compared to 2023. VF also ranked #12 amongst all companies globally in the food technology space.

VF designs, manufactures, and deploys intelligent autonomous CEA systems across the globe. The systems and the technologies within them are primarily used to improve food production, addressing key issues such as food scarcity, water security, population growth, and complex global supply chains. Increasingly, however, VF’s systems are finding their way into new use cases such as pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, integration with greenhouses, and even (as per recent news), research and development for application in outer space, working with NASA and the U.K. Space Agency.

2023 was a difficult year for the global CEA sector, encompassing many failed business models, negative press, and overall difficult market conditions. There were many reasons contributing to these market difficulties, including poor technology selection, over-expansion, the drying up of capital investment, rising interest rates, and a natural attrition rate given the relative lack of maturity of the sector and number of new market entrants who were insufficiently funded or chose the wrong business model.

Positive activity, including substantial capital investments in Q4 of 2023 followed by several large-scale deals in the U.S. and more broadly, have led to a more positive outlook on the sector. This is coupled with a continued rise for innovative solutions that address the impact of climate change and many other negative factors addressing the world today.

The independent recognition validates VF’s innovative, unique model, that has, since 2018, been plant science and technology-led, following VF’s initial phase as a vertical farming grower across London and the U.K. The achievement comes after eight years of hard work and pivotal strategic decisions, such as moving almost every operation in-house (including manufacturing), focusing on scale to achieve price parity, championing a science-led approach, and providing products and services to secondary markets.


FoodTech500 by Forward Fooding is the world’s first list of global entrepreneurial talent at the intersection of food, technology, and sustainability. Since its launch in 2019, it had over 9,000 applicants, reached over 180 countries, and amounted to $24,6 billion USD in investment raised by the winners. The ranking is based on business size, digital footprint, and sustainability practices.

Commenting on the achievement, Jamie Burrows, Founder and CEO of Vertical Futures, said:
“We are delighted with Vertical Future’s recent recognition as the #1 CEA technology company globally and #12 amongst the entire global Food Technology community on the FoodTech500 list. It’s the market telling us that our almost eight years of hard work, movement from being an operator to a tech and data company, and constant push to develop the best system and overall model have not been in vain. Strategic decisions combined with our hard work and top-of-the-range, innovative offerings are all factors that together make Vertical Future unique. Our journey is far from over.”

About Vertical Future
Vertical Future (“VF”) is a global CEA technology and data company, headquartered in London and founded in 2016. VF designs, manufactures, and deploys autonomous vertical farms across the world into multiple use cases, from food through to pharmaceuticals, and soon to be reforestation. VF’s fully integrated model is unique globally with a goal of contributing to healthier people and planet. VF has raised over £37 million of funding to date, has received over 12 Innovate U.K. grants, and operates with a team of over 60 staff across engineering, software engineering, plant sciences, operations, and commercial. To find out more about Vertical Future, go to verticalfuture.com.

Farmable fabrics – a tailor-made diversification opportunity for UK agriculture?

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

While we can all agree that food is a necessity, clothing is also pretty high on the list! Perhaps surprisingly, around 70% of the clothes we wear today are made from plastics such as polyester. However, more sustainable, ‘farmable’ fabrics do exist – such as linen, wool and hemp – that could offer a lucrative diversification opportunity for UK growers.

Farmable fabrics – a tailor-made diversification opportunity for UK agriculture? A picture of a flax field.

WWF research reveals that 46% of the UK’s carbon footprint comes from overseas emissions – which includes the majority of our low-cost clothing imported from countries like China, Bangladesh and Turkey.

Last month (March 2024) France’s parliament unanimously approved a bill imposing an environmental levy on low-cost fashion which would enable domestic production to compete with oversees alternatives. Given our goal of Net Zero, the potential implementation of a ‘carbon offshoring’ tax on imports seems imminent.

Hemp – a diversification opportunity for UK agriculture

Additionally, this week (9 April 2024), the UK introduced significant legislation changes in industrial hemp licensing to facilitate regulated cultivation of hemp. The change offers huge potential for UK arable farmers to pioneer a whole new crop, not only as a practical solution for sustainable fashion but also as a lucrative opportunity to sell hemp to the textile industries.

Could British agriculture take on the fabric industry and pave the way for an eco-friendly wardrobe?!

Becky Dodds, as well as being Director of Communities at Agri-TechE , is an avid hobby sewist, crocheter and even one-time denim shoemaker; so she knows more than most about the world of fabrics and textiles. This month she muses on ‘alternative’ clothing materials and how growing sustainable crops for fabric production could be a real game-changer for British agriculture.

The UK’s sustainable, ‘farmable’ fabrics

As consumer consciousness evolves, so does the demand for sustainable alternatives to plastic-based textiles. Retailers are increasingly embracing eco-friendly textiles such as ECOVERA viscose, deadstock fabrics (created from waste from fashion houses) and bamboo silks.

Linen, made from flax, and once a cornerstone of British textile production, has ceded ground to overseas cotton in recent years. Current UK linen-production is now restricted to artisan weavers, although some industry leaders – including resident Sewing Bee judge Patrick Grant – are on a mission to revive domestic linen production.

British wool is a compelling option with the few British woollen mills and spinners attracting a premium price (such as the well-known Harris Tweed). Lingering misconceptions about sustainability and ethics are being addressed by Woolmark.

Farmable fabrics – a tailor-made diversification opportunity for UK agriculture?
Viscose-linen mix fabric, with natural linen texture. Viscose is made from wood pulp and is more breatheable than cotton.

The biggest alternative to wool is acrylic yarn which does not stand up to washing and releases microplastics in the process; bamboo and alpaca are better alternatives though are generally imported.

Leather alternatives are also on the rise – utilising everything from pineapple waste to grape skins, both of which took centre stage in Stella McCartney’s recent collection. However, many still need to be mixed with plastics in some form, and the processes of both tanning leather and creating leather alternatives is often energy and chemically intensive.

Dyeing and colouring clothes is another chemical-heavy process – with some concerns over toxicity, and issues with contaminated waste-water not being properly treated. A potential solution could be in the breeding of coloured cotton – for centuries grown globally in a range of hues, we now use water-intensive and chemicals to dye our only-white cotton.

This is but a tiny snapshot into just one market that agriculture could help service. Indeed, some of our community are doing just that – Ponda is using paludiculture to produce an alternative for polyester/feather stuffing using bullrush and Fibe is transforming potato waste to a cotton-alternative textile.

Opportunities in sustainable fabric production

Whilst some research suggests only 15% of people are making consistent sustainable fashion purchases, it’s pretty safe to say we are trending towards a socially conscious future, not only with what we eat, how we fuel our lives, but also what we choose to wear.

To meet this future demand, now is the time to identify and build these supply chains. Projects such as the Centre of High Carbon Capture Cropping will help growers diversify their rotations, improve their soils and water, and profit from growing for novel biomaterials. With a newly-released government strategy for materials and manufacturing in 2050, plus dedicated funding support (BBSRC is launching a call for feasibility studies into bio-based materials), opportunity is ripe to explore the future of farm crops for clothing.

Tencel – a brand of viscose using fewer chemicals and less energy to produce than generic viscose, and with a focus on sustainable source wood and waste water recycling.
Organic bamboo silk dyed with certified OEKO-TEX certified dyes
LENZIG ECOVERO viscose, with a much lower impact environmentally than regular viscose (made of wood pulp)

Circling back to Patrick Grant… the Homegrown/Homespun project looks at how to rebuild the whole UK flax supply chain – from growing, to processing, weaving and even dyeing with UK-grown indigo.

Last year, Agri-TechE considered alternative crops at our event – sharing the work of Niab and other institutes looking in part at the profitability of using novel crops in the rotation. But perhaps for some crops, the supply chain needs to be built in order to reap the reward of introducing these soil-improving crops to our rotations.

Fashion is just one potential new market for UK-grown crops – as the world looks to reduce its reliance on synthetic materials, there is no doubt that more opportunities are to be found for plant-based alternatives that deliver environmental and financial benefit to the farm.

For further learning on this topic, Articles of Interest podcast delves deep into the history of fabrics; I particularly recommend the Blue Jeans episode.

Lettus Grow: Ro-Gro Launches Pioneering Biofortified Microgreens

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

In an industry first, vertical farm Ro-Gro has cultivated biofortified pea shoots with added Vitamin B12, available in Spring 2024 to retailers and hospitality.

A joint collaboration between vertical farm Ro-Gro, plant and microbiology research institute the John Innes Centre, food and health bioscience facility, the Quadram Institute, and indoor farming tech firm LettUs Grow has resulted in the very first pea shoots biofortified with vitamin B12 coming to market. The pea shoots grown in Ro-Gro’s vertical farm in Kent are biofortified with B12, using ultrasonic aeroponic technology developed by LettUs Grow.

Read the full article here

Cambridge Consultants: Trusted soil measurement is the key to scaled regenerative agriculture

Member News
Agri-TechE
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Sustainability is now core to the mission, vision and strategy of businesses and nations worldwide. Everyone has net zero targets and grand plans to minimise environmental impact.

But questions about implementation and traceability are emerging.

Few are more pertinent than the thorny issue of measurement and traceability. How do you reliably and quantifiably measure the impact of initiatives to ensure your net zero ambitions remain on track? And do they stand up to external scrutiny?

Cambridge Consultants explore this topic.

Read the full report here.

Barenbrug: Check ‘Made for SFI’ seed mixtures carefully

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Growers who signed up for herbal leys as one of the 23 options from the 2023 Sustainable Farming Initiative programme should seek competent advice on the suitability of mixtures being sold as ‘SAM3 compatible’, Barenbrug says, as seed decisions loom.

The UK grass-seed breeder points out that while Defra has issued guidelines as to what will properly constitute a ‘herbal ley’ under the scheme, those guidelines are not yet mandatory.

“A seed mixture that has been constituted only to tick boxes against the SAM3 guidelines is perhaps not the best approach,” suggests Janet Montgomery, Barenbrug’s agriculture product manager.

“While it may serve to meet the bare minimum required by the guidelines, it risks doing little or nothing to achieve the full intention of a herbal ley, environmentally or agronomically.

“The best herbal leys deliver improvements in soil health, structure and fertility, and increased biodiversity, while remaining agronomically productive,” Janet says.

“That’s the true spirit of the SFI: delivering environmental benefits with approachable principles that continue to deliver productivity as part of a conventional farming system,” she points out.

“Yet some mixtures labelled ‘SAM3’ might be little more than a standard mix with a ‘top-up’ of legumes and herbs.

“It’s a bit like buying an unknown brand of cola: while the label shows all the same ingredients as the top brand, there’s always a difference in taste. It’s all about know-how – knowing how to blend to get the best results.”

Similarly, a below-par seed blend is likely to result not just in a poor herbal ley, but unsatisfactory agronomic performance to boot, she warns.

“A herbal ley is a really approachable, accessible way to enter SFI,” observes Janet. “Done well, it will deliver – and will demonstrate that SFI doesn’t have to be difficult, or result in lower productivity, if the right agronomic decisions are made.

“Yet if someone’s had a bad experience as a result of a sub-standard mixture, who’ll want to come back to the idea of a herbal ley?”

Janet acknowledges that while the absence of firm guidelines makes it more difficult to ‘second-guess’ what will be deemed acceptable under SAM3 measures, Barenbrug’s approach has been to review its own experience of herbal leys and select species that are known to perform well when grown together, and which offer secondary benefits such as sward resilience.

“What’s more, when designing the SFI mixture, we made the decision to go ‘all out’ for the maximum recommended number of species. That’s five grasses, three legumes, and five herbs.

“We don’t yet know how SFI claims like SAM3 will be checked and enforced, but we believe pursuing the highest quality route ensures top-notch agronomic performance without compromise, while meeting all the environmental requirements that the scheme is designed to address.”

SAM3 promises payments of £382/ha through the planting of a herbal ley.

Plants as biofactories – a high value opportunity for vertical farming?

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

Contributing his expertise to the workshop is Malcolm Skingle, Director of Academic Liaison at GSK, who has seen the evolution of natural products over many years. GSK has dipped in and out of plant-derived pharmaceuticals and used alkaloids as starting points for novel chemistry programmes.

Malcolm says the key challenges with natural products have been issues around purifying the active ingredients, and ensuring consistency of potency and yield: “The pharmaceutical industry has been fickle in the area of natural products as the yields have been low. However, the technology moves on and I have, through GSK and work with BBSRC, kept a watching brief on developments.”

Malcolm Skingle
Malcolm Skingle of GSK
White willow
Bark of the white willow was the original source of salicylates for multiple medicinal uses. The active ingredient is now synthesised as Aspirin.

Technologies developed at the John Innes Centre (JIC), a member of Agri-TechE , have been used by Canadian company Medicago to produce proteins for vaccines using Nicotinana Benthaminana (tobacco) plants as bioreactors.

The company used the technology to develop a COVID-19 vaccine candidate in collaboration with the Canadian government, using an adjuvant manufactured by GSK. Unfortunately, the first Canadian-made vaccine was rejected by the UN due to the involvement of the tobacco industry, however other plants – including the potato – also have potential as biofactories.

Dr Belinda Clarke, Director of Agri-TechE , observes: “The commercial exploitation of technologies developed at JIC show there is market potential for production of high value active ingredients in plant biofactories, but there are still many elements to be co-aligned, not least the regulatory environment.”

Adjuvants are a potential opportunity for biofactories – they boost the immune system and are a critical component of many vaccines, but only a few have been approved by the US Food and Drugs Administration.

HotHouse Therapeutics aims to explore this niche. It was spun out from JIC following a breakthrough from Professor Anne Osbourn’s lab that created an understanding of the biosynthesis of the vaccine adjuvant QS-21, used in vaccines for Covid 19, malaria, shingles, and RSV.

HotHouse Therapeutics

QS-21 is currently extracted from the bark of the Chilean Soapbark Tree and a single gram of the pure material costs more than $100,000. However, the tree bark also contains even more potent molecules that are present in such tiny amounts that they cannot be extracted at commercial scale.

HotHouse Therapeutics’ technology has the potential to synthesise these hyper-potent molecules in a biofactory, removing the need for extraction from wild trees and addressing a significant unmet need in the vaccine industry.

Martin Stocks, HotHouse Therapeutics CEO
Martin Stocks, HotHouse Therapeutics CEO

Martin Stocks, co-founder of HotHouse Therapeutics, explains: “HotHouse Therapeutics has the capability of isolating and reconstructing entire biosynthetic pathways that generate metabolites/chemicals of interest, from plants or other organisms.

“We can not only produce a compound of interest in our plant biofactory but also modify the pathway to improve its properties.” The company views vertical farming technology companies as a key element for the future development of these innovations.

Tony Jones from OneNucleus comments: “By bringing together pharma and agri-tech we plan to explore the current obstacles and the innovations needed to help realise the potential of this exciting prospect.”