Revolutionising British strawberries: Dyson Farming’s new growing system

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Dyson Farming is proud to unveil its latest breakthrough in sustainable agriculture: the Hybrid Vertical Growing System (HVGS), a pioneering innovation that’s transforming how strawberries are grown in Britain.

Located in our 26-acre glasshouse in Carrington, Lincolnshire, the HVGS boosts strawberry yields by an astonishing 250%. Instead of traditional rows, strawberries are cultivated on towering, Ferris wheel-like rigs, reaching over 5.5 metres tall, that rotate to ensure optimal exposure to sunlight and LED lighting. This vertical approach maximises space, enhances fruit quality, and allows for year-round production, even in the depths of winter.

The system is powered by renewable energy and surplus heat from our adjacent anaerobic digesters, which also supply CO₂ to enrich plant growth. Rainwater harvested from the glasshouse roof irrigates the crops, while advanced climate control systems maintain ideal growing conditions.

Robotic technology plays a key role too: vision-guided machines pick only the ripest fruit, while UV-emitting bots protect plants from mould. Insect predators are deployed instead of pesticides, ensuring a healthier, more natural crop.

This innovation marks a bold step toward food security, sustainability, and self-sufficiency in the UK.

From the Dragons’ den to Defra’s: new government funding to boost agri-tech

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has launched a new £12.6 million funding package to support agri-tech innovation. It will be a ‘Dragons Den’-style process comprising two competitions. Forming part of the government’s Farming Innovation Programme, these competitions will reward the businesses that can offer the most innovative solutions to systemic challenges in the agricultural sector, such as rising costs and environmental pressures.

This initiative represents a progression of the government’s New Deal for Farmers and is a signal that agri-tech is a core component of its food security and rural growth strategy. Whilst the government has already pledged to allocate £11.8 billion to sustainable farming and food production over the next parliament, this additional funding arrives at a politically sensitive moment for the agricultural industry. The government’s relationship with the agricultural community has been tested during Labour’s first year in office, particularly following widespread backlash against the 2024 autumn budget’s proposed changes to inheritance tax. Against this backdrop, increased funding is not only an economic stimulus to encourage technological development, but also an attempt to reset the government’s political relationship with the agricultural sector. As a visible commitment to supporting innovation-led growth, it indicates that the government is listening to the sector’s demands for long-term solutions rather than short-term fixes.

The funding itself will be delivered through two competitions set to open from mid-September. The Small R&D Partnerships competition, launching on 15 September, will offer up to £7.8 million to support later-stage projects that are near commercial readiness. The strongest bids will be those that are able to demonstrate how their product or service will improve productivity, sustainability, progression, and resilience, as well as having a clear avenue to market upon. The second competition, allocating up to £4.8 million for early-stage ideas, will open on 13 October and is designed to assist developers in scaling up their project. Both competitions will be carried out in partnership with Innovate UK.

This is positive news for businesses in the agri-tech sector. The government is actively seeking to fund scalable, practical technologies that can solve the problems straining today’s agricultural sector. Rather than simply financing projects that are market-ready, the government is willing to fund the development of ideas. It solidifies the role that agri-tech plays in enhancing sustainability and boosting rural productivity via technological innovation.

Ultimately, this announcement acts as a timely reminder that agricultural innovation is  recognised by the government as a mechanism for economic growth and as a frontier industry in the UK’s industrial strategy. As the government seeks to establish a balance between regulation, business support, and long-term agricultural resilience, initiatives like these will play a central role in shaping the next generation of British farming.

If you wish to discuss the government’s agri-tech policy or how to access this funding, please reach out to thea@gkstrategy.com.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

IAgrE Conference 2025, On-line 22nd October – Will AI Revolutionise Agriculture?

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Book in here

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Organic Research Centre joins ADAS

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Organic Research Centre (ORC), the UK’s foremost research authority on organic farming and low-input farming practices, has become part of RSK ADAS Limited, effective from 1 September 2025.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.
8
7

Retaining the ORC brand, ORC is a stand-alone business within the ADAS group of companies and will continue to be managed by current CEO Lucy MacLennan. The move of ORC research staff and ongoing ORC projects to ADAS will allow both organisations to benefit from shared resources and complementary applied research expertise.

Lucy MacLennan said:

“The move of ORC to ADAS not only safeguards the future of ORC and our work advocating organic and low-input farming principles, it also means we can evolve and expand our research into new areas. The ORC has a long and accomplished history, and we want to reassure our supporters that our strategic research aims remain the same as when we were founded  – to protect the environment and to enhance biodiversity by means of independent applied organic research and to communicate our research findings widely so as to encourage change throughout the British agricultural sector.”

Prior to the move, ORC formed part of the Progressive Farming Trust charity, which also maintains the Agricology knowledge platform. The Progressive Farming Trust and Agricology will remain separate entities, and their activities will continue unchanged.

Jackie Evans, Managing Director of ADAS Group, commented:

“This move signals the start of an exciting new chapter for ORC and ADAS. ADAS has an excellent track record of delivering independent applied research to support sustainable, resilient, and profitable farming systems. With ORC’s agroecological expertise now in-house, we can pool our knowledge to deliver complex, multifaceted agricultural projects and ensure we continue to deliver the best possible environmental outcomes. Our aim is to add to our portfolio of research and advice, and create a centre of excellence for organic agricultural research.”

“We are delighted to welcome ORC and its staff to ADAS, and we look forward to working together to drive research and innovation in organic, agroecological, and regenerative farming systems.”

ORC’s chair, Donald Peck, added:

“In ADAS, we are very pleased to have found a partner which both respects our history and shares our values. We are excited about the future of independent organic research and the opportunities this partnership will bring to continue this work while Progressive Farming Trust makes its own separate impact.”

Nantwich Farm Vets Partnering in Calf Health Innovation

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Nantwich Farm Vets partnering in calf health innovation.

Nantwich Farm vets are about to start round 2 of an innovative project in conjunction with Agri-TechE member’s Roboscientific, and SRUC (Scotland’s Rural College), and global animal health company Zoetis, and Ritchie Engineering Services Ltd, based in Aberdeen.

Roboscientific, winner of the 2019 Tesco Agri-TechE T-Jam award, specialise in detecting & analysing volatile organic compounds (produced by organisms such as bacteria) enabling early identification of disease. Building on their previous success with barn monitoring of pigs and chickens the current project, funded by Innovate UK, involves installing their VOC analysers on automatic calf feeders on 3 farms looked after by Nantwich Farm Vets. These analysers capture a sample of breath from individual calves as they feed and analyse the VOC ‘fingerprint’. Electronic ID tags enable the VOC pattern to be assigned to the individual calves and stored as a digital record on the farm.

Two of the Nantwich Farm Vet team visit the farms every day for 28 days where, using a published respiratory scoring system (the Wisconsin score), they will ‘score’ each calf. These scores will be added to lung scanning data and laboratory test results to then allow the Roboscientific and SRUC teams to correlate the VOC pattern with the clinical picture from the examination of the calves. The aim of the project will be to identify the difference between a ‘healthy’ VOC pattern, and the VOC pattern of a calf starting to develop respiratory disease.

“Our novel technology means that farmers will have a system of monitoring their calves for respiratory disease at this critical early stage of their lives automatically and non-invasively. By identifying calves with respiratory disease sooner, the vet and farm team will be able to implement treatment protocols sooner, leading to improved responses and enhanced calf welfare” says Angie Curtis, Sales Director for Roboscientific.

Round 1 of the project was completed in Spring 2025; in October/November 2025, the project team will return to the farms for round 2 of the trial, at which point Roboscientific hope to have a working prototype that will alert the farms to any calves that are starting to develop respiratory disease.

Business Development Manager Phil Cullinan has worked closely with the Roboscientific, SRUC and Zoetis teams to coordinate the practice’s role in the trial. “We’re ideally placed to support this type of project at the practice. Two of our vets are Personal Licence holders and our large, progressive customer base of dairy farms means we can support a wide variety of trial work”.

If anyone wants to discuss planned trial work contact Phil on philcullinan@nantwichfarmvets.co.uk

No more nasties: The government stamps its feet on baby food

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

The Department of Health and Social Care recently unveiled a new set of voluntary guidelines aiming to enhance the nutritional quality of commercial baby foods. These set new expectations for manufacturers, retailers, trade associations and non-governmental healthcare organisations to reduce the sugar and salt content of baby food and address misleading labelling within the next 18 months.

This initiative is the latest intervention as part of the government’s ‘Plan for Change’ and its broader 10-year plan for health. Building upon previous HFSS measures, such as the ban on junk food advertisements restrictions on fast-food outlets near schools, it indicates a growing appetite to intervene to improve the nation’s dietary health. Childhood obesity rates have doubled since the 1990s and obesity currently costs the NHS £11.4 billion per year; this is expected to increase as obese children reach adulthood. In order to shape healthy eating habits as much as possible, policymakers are turning their focus to the formative stages of children’s diets. The rationale is straightforward: if a child’s very first diet is contributing to lifelong health problems, then meaningful change must begin from the highchair.

The evidence underpinning these guidelines is clear. Researchers from the University of Leeds have found that baby foods from market leaders lack nutritional value and market their products in a misleading way. All too often, these products are sugary, watery, and breed consumer confusion with misleading slogans like ‘contains no nasties’. The guidance also advises manufacturers not to market products aimed at children under twelve months of age as ‘snacks’, with NHS guidance for parents contending that children this young do not need to eat snacks.

For manufacturers and retailers alike, the challenge will be to reformulate at pace. With the use of sweeteners prohibited for all foods aimed at children aged three and under, and a market that values both taste and convenience, they will need to find new ways to meet nutritional needs whilst maintaining trust with parental consumers.

Though billed as voluntary, these guidelines represent a clear direction of travel for the government. Public health campaigners have already indicated that these recommendations represent a further step rather than the finish line, and the government has left the door open to mandatory regulation should uptake be slow or inconsistent. For businesses, the choice is binary: act now and shape the policy conversation, or risk playing catch-up if it was to become law.

The government’s strong stance on baby food is a clear signal of intent to improve the nutritional content of the nation’s diet. It forms part of a wider push by the government to encourage healthy eating habits, improve transparency between businesses and consumers and reduce the long-term economic burden on the NHS. Whilst this will result in short-term costs to businesses, there remains a real strategic opportunity to engage in the policy conversation. Businesses that position themselves early as genuine leaders in providing nutritional baby food can win the trust of both policymakers and increasingly health-conscious parents.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Nantwich Farm Vets drive growth of biological fly control on North West farms

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

As fly populations rise with warming temperatures, UK dairy farms are increasingly turning to sustainable pest management strategies. One method gaining popularity is the use of biological fly control — specifically, the deployment of parasitic wasps, often branded as Biowasps. Additionally, parasitic flies and mites (Biofly and Biomite) are available for use in specific cases to support the Biowasp.

Biowasps are tiny, non-stinging insects that target fly pupae, breaking the breeding cycle and reducing future fly populations. They are harmless to humans and animals but deadly to flies in the pupal stage. They offer a natural, chemical-free alternative to traditional insecticides, which can lead to resistance, residue issues, and harm to non-target species including humans. On dairy farms, reducing fly burdens is essential for maintaining cow comfort, preventing disease transmission and improving milk yields.

Typically, Biowasps are introduced early in the season and applied regularly through the warmer months. They are most effective when used as part of an integrated pest management plan — combining good muck handling, dry bedding practices, and monitoring hot spots like calf pens, muck heaps and feed areas.

Trials and anecdotal reports from UK farms show that Biowasps can reduce fly populations significantly when used correctly. Their ease of use, compatibility with organic systems, and minimal environmental impact make them an increasingly attractive option for forward-thinking farms.

At Nantwich Farm Vets, anyone interested in the use of Biowasps receives an individualised site assessment and bespoke plan to cover the fly season. Packs of Biowasps (+/- Biofly/Biomite as required) are delivered every 2 weeks starting around April and running through to late September/early October.

Business Development Manager, Phil Cullinan has been working closely with Bestico and the farm team at the practice to drive growth in this area. “We’re seeing more and more of our farmers turn to biological fly control to help control the flies on their farm. People are becoming increasingly aware of the use of chemicals on-farm and are often looking to reduce them for a variety of reasons, including their own health. Bestico offer a viable alternative and we’re seeing great growth in this area”.

IMG_0844
h8c8d256efd1d23ee4c7dce9150971b26

Why is Monitoring Mineralisation Important in Agriculture?

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

For today’s farmer, visual assessment or an annual soil analysis alone is no longer enough – fields require more precise and continuous monitoring. One of the key processes that determines both yield and quality is soil mineralisation. By understanding how nutrients are released in the soil and when they become available to crops, fertilisation can be made smarter, more efficient, and more environmentally friendly.

What is mineralisation?

Mineralisation is a natural process in which the nutrients contained in organic matter are released into plant-available forms through the activity of soil microorganisms. The speed of mineralisation depends on several factors: temperature, moisture, soil aeration, soil pH, and the quantity and quality of organic matter. In temperate climates, mineralisation is seasonal. With Paul-Tech’s soil station, it is possible to monitor this process in real time.

For farmers, understanding mineralisation is essential as it helps optimise fertiliser use and improve soil fertility.

How does monitoring mineralisation help farmers?

Savings can be made on fertilising autumn-sown crops by knowing the nutrient status of the soil before sowing. Paul-Tech’s soil station provides this overview through nutrient and NO₃-N graphs (see figure). Pre-sowing mineralisation appears on the graphs once crops have used up the applied fertiliser and their growth slows down. At this stage, ageing plants begin to break down. The effects of previous crop residues and manure are also visible. Under favourable temperature and moisture conditions, organic matter decomposes quickly.

The type of crop also matters: nitrogen is released rapidly from legume residues, followed by brassicas, while cereal residues take longer to break down.

If noticeable increases in nutrient levels occur before harvest, the nitrogen requirements for the next crop can be reduced significantly. Excess nitrogen can weaken winter crop survival and, if not taken up by plants, will be leached from the soil. Where spring crops follow in the rotation, the nitrogen released through mineralisation can be retained in the field with cover crops.

Summary

Monitoring the process of mineralisation is an essential tool in modern agriculture, helping farmers work more knowledgeably, efficiently, and sustainably. Paul-Tech’s soil station provides valuable support here, enabling you to track mineralisation across seasons and fields, and make decisions based on facts rather than assumptions. Real-time data gives you the confidence that your field is getting exactly what it needs – no more and no less.

👉 Want to see how Paul-Tech’s soil station can help you track mineralisation and other soil processes? Book a free demo with us, and we’ll find the right solution for your fields.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Nantwich Farm Vets work with Agri-TechE member Vet Vision AI on Cheshire Dairy Farm

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Nantwich Farm Vets are pioneering a new method of monitoring dairy cow comfort to support the growth & progression of their dairy clients.

Using technology from Agri-TechE member Vet Vision AI, they now offer a ground-breaking service – monitoring cows 24/7 using night vision-equipped time-lapse cameras and artificial intelligence, providing insights that would otherwise be impossible. Cow behaviour patterns can be tracked day and night, with detailed reports highlighting differences across the farm and benchmarking against other UK herds. Key metrics include cow comfort, resting times, and feeding patterns, making it easier for farmers to take meaningful action to continually improve health and well-being.

Brothers Will and Harry Dodd, of Dodleston Hall Farm near Chester, are early adopters. “We know our cows are doing really well,” says Will, “but there are a few things we’re considering changing to make them even more comfortable. Before investing tens of thousands of pounds, we want objective data to help guide where our funds will make the biggest difference. We’re really excited to see what this shows us.”

Rob George, partner at Nantwich Farm Vets and one of the farm’s main vets, adds: “Comfortable cows tend to be healthier, and healthier cows are more productive. This technology supports the win-win-win we strive for. Our practice will work closely with the Dodd family and Vet Vision AI to maximise cow health and welfare, driving the sustainability and long-term profitability of the farm.”

Business Development Manager Phil Cullinan has worked with Charlie Carslake and Liz Cresswell from Vet Vision AI to bring the opportunity to the practice. “It’s great to be able to see the progression of this from initial conversations with Charlie to now ‘going live’ on farm. We’re excited to see how this helps our clients better understand their stock behaviours and plan their investments accordingly”.

The cameras are being installed in September 2025, with results expected in October.


  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Rethinking forages: Dairy Australia invites global collaboration on national R&D priorities

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Australia’s dairy industry is taking a bold new approach to forage research. Backed by Dairy Moving Forward (DMF), the new National Dairy Forages R&D Strategy outlines a five-year vision to foster high-impact, nationally coordinated investments.

Now, Dairy Australia is calling on local and international researchers, agtech startups, and industry innovators to help co-design the next wave of forage solutions. Submissions close Thursday, 4th September, 5pm AEST.

“Our investment approach is shifting from partner-based to outcome-focused – and that means building truly collaborative, national-scale research that delivers for farmers,” says Jay Mody, Head of Research Investments at Dairy Australia.

View the opportunity here, via growag.com.

What is Dairy Moving Forward?
Dairy Moving Forward (DMF) is a long-standing collaboration between Dairy Australia, the Australian Dairy Farmers, Gardiner Foundation, and five state governments. While not a legal entity, the group plays a pivotal role in setting strategic R&D priorities for the industry and aligning cross-sector investment.

The new National Dairy Forages R&D Strategy was developed under DMF’s guidance and now enters its implementation phase, led by Dairy Australia. With four major forage investments set to conclude by FY26, the strategy provides a timely opportunity to reshape national investment across six priority areas.

Six priorities, one clear goal: impact for farmers
The Strategy outlines six key priorities — from breeding to soil-plant microbiomes. Priority 1 (National Breeding Objectives) and part of Priority 5 are being managed directly by Dairy Australia.

“Australia has the most diverse range of dairy production systems globally, which means our forage systems are equally complex,” says Dr John Penry, Dairy Australia’s Principal Scientist.

“This strategy provides a 20- to 30-year roadmap for R&D, developed through deep consultation and rigorous review.”

International collaboration is strongly encouraged, particularly in areas such as low-emissions forages.

“There’s huge opportunity to work with countries like New Zealand, Ireland, and parts of South America — particularly around low-emissions forage systems and improved digestibility,” says John.

He also identifies critical capability gaps ripe for innovation — notably remote sensing for pasture quality, and tools to measure genetic gains in forage breeding.

Building collaborative pipelines: A co-design approach
Rather than traditional funding rounds, Dairy Australia is running a structured co-design process from now through to November.

Two targeted webinars have already been held — one for research institutions, the other for the agtech sector — with submissions due by Thursday, 4th September. Proposals will be reviewed by a six-person expert panel covering pasture and crop agronomy, investment, animal nutrition, and practical farming.

Successful applicants will enter co-design workshops from September to November, supported by visibility over others’ capabilities to encourage partnership formation.

“It’s a rare opportunity — when you submit, you’ll also get access to a directory of who else is involved. That kind of visibility helps people connect and build stronger, more aligned projects,” Jay explains.

A call to agritech: Innovation must meet science
For the first time, agritech solutions have been explicitly invited into a national strategy of this scale.

Emily Samyue, Dairy Australia’s Head of Innovation, sees this as a major step forward.

“We’ve invested in agtech over the last three years, but this is the first time we’re embedding it into a core R&D strategy. There’s a real appetite for innovations that lift productivity, profitability, and sustainability — no matter where they come from,” Emily says.

Startups are encouraged to engage, especially in Priority 3: NextGen technology and management tools, but need to meet three criteria:

  • Technologies should have early validation or field trials
  • Founders must be open to co-design and feedback
  • A strong understanding of dairy industry needs is essential

“It’s about partnering with researchers to prove out the science behind your tech — not just pitching a product,” says Emily. “This is about impact, not marketing.”

Dairy Australia will offer in-kind and financial support, and can facilitate access to research farms and commercial players to help de-risk collaborations and support market entry.

Why now — and why you?
With $15 million in public and levy funding allocated annually to forages research (with another $25 million from private investment seed companies), the opportunity for real-world impact is significant.

“We’re not looking for 100 siloed projects,” says Jay. “We want consolidated, high-impact proposals that address our national priorities and deliver value for Australian farmers.”

Emily echoes this focus on impact, particularly for agritech applicants. “We’re really looking for that overlap between innovation and science,” she says. “It’s not just about a good idea — it’s about how it can be validated, scaled, and make a measurable difference for dairy farmers.”

International and cross-sector collaboration is not only welcomed — it’s essential. This is a call to those with novel solutions, strong science, and a mindset for partnership.

Get involved
Applications are open now. Submissions close Thursday, 4th September, 5pm AEST, with co-design workshops to follow. Learn more
here.

 

Australian producers call for practical and locally-proven agritech solutions

Member News
Agri-TechE

Australian producers are seeking agritech solutions proven to perform in Australia’s harsh and diverse environments. From horticulture to dairy farming, the message is clear: overseas innovation must be tested, tailored, and supported locally to succeed here.

When it comes to farming in Australia, no two operations look the same, and neither do their technology needs. From orchard rows in Victoria’s Yarra Valley to pasture-based dairies in the state’s southwest, producers are navigating challenges from labour shortages to climate volatility and seeking global solutions.

In September, AgriFutures growAG., Dairy Australia and Hort Innovation will co-host the Around the World – Australia webinar. Designed for UK-based researchers and innovators, a part of the Agri-TechE network, the session will explore the growAG. platform as a gateway to collaboration, highlight the key differences between the UK and Australian agrifood production, share first-hand perspectives from two Australian producers on where innovation is most needed, and how global partnerships could help.

 

“Labour is a big problem” – the horticulture perspective

As Production Manager at Battunga Orchards for over 21 years, Mark Trzaskoma oversees 176 planted hectares of apples, pears, and lemons across three Victorian sites in West Gippsland, about an hour and fifteen minutes southeast of Melbourne. His biggest challenge? Skilled labour.

“Labour is a big problem – especially skilled labour. Unskilled labour is becoming increasingly unskilled. Current training focuses on amenity horticulture – home gardens – not large-scale commercial operations,” Mark explains.

The business has been heavily mechanised, eliminating ladders in favour of work platforms for pruning, hand thinning, and harvesting. Revo platforms – self-propelled orchard platforms with built-in conveyor belts and bin fillers – have boosted efficiency, but not every technology trial has paid off.

In 2015, Battunga Orchards partnered with an American robotics company to test a robotic apple harvester. “It could pick colour well and achieved a 76% removal rate – the highest they’d seen – but it couldn’t get the volume. Manual pickers still do 100%,” says Mark.

 

Mark Trzaskoma
apples-packaging-300x200-1

Data for decisions

Automated data collection, however, is an area where technology has delivered benefits for Battunga Orchards. The Canadian-developed Vivid Machines canopy scanner now captures fruit counts, sizes, bud numbers and growth rates across 30% of orchard blocks, helping Mark make faster, more informed management decisions.

“We used to count five trees in a block; now we scan every third row. The data is more robust, and we can track fruit growth. One block’s estimate was within two or three bins of the final tally,” he says.

Mark also sees potential in advanced irrigation technology, particularly as drought tightens water supplies this year. Despite having a state-of-the-art system on one farm, moisture monitoring still relies on manual probes. “We’ve been too comfortable with our water supply – it’s not until you get bitten that you think, maybe we can do something better here.”

 

A call for grower identity and fit-for-purpose imports

Beyond the farm gate, Mark believes there’s a problem with global supply chain collaboration, and greater transparency is needed, including grower identity, particularly for the horticulture industry.

“It’s one of the only industries in the world where the people who do it well, aren’t known. Nobody knows the growers – who’s good and who isn’t. For export, if growers were known more, buyers could search them out,” he says, pointing to branding, traceability, and QR codes as part of the solution.

And while Australian growers are eager adopters of overseas innovation, climate and system differences often limit success. “Too often, something’s imported without proper local testing or limited backup service. We need technology that’s fit-for-purpose here, not just in a Northern Hemisphere orchard.”

 

Innovation needs local proof – the dairy perspective

A three-hour drive west, near Colac in southwest Victoria, Sam Simpson runs Craiglands Holsteins with her husband Mark Billing, on a fourth-generation, 450-hectare dryland dairy farm milking between 380–420 cows. The family has witnessed a century of change, from hand-feeding grain to computer-controlled collars that automatically deliver rations based on each cow’s needs.

“Technology has transformed the way we manage stock – from insight into animal health and mating behaviour to better record-keeping for the whole business,” Sam says.

Early adopters of GEA’s CowScout collar system and management software, the Billings also use genomics to improve fertility, reduce methane emissions, and diversify income through crossbreeding.

 

Barriers to adoption

While open to innovation, Sam is clear: new technology must provide a tangible return or meet a regulatory requirement. “If it doesn’t provide an extra income stream or more money in your pocket, it’s harder to adopt unless it’s pressed on you from a regulatory angle.”

Some promising tools remain out of reach in Victoria due to pending legislation – like virtual herding, which uses GPS-enabled collars to move cattle remotely, reducing on-farm vehicle use and improving safety. “It’s got more value than just moving stock around. There’s also the potential OHS value. If you can reduce the hours staff spend on bikes moving animals, you’re reducing risk and cost.”

Other Northern Hemisphere imports, such as robotic milking systems designed for barns, often need modification for Australia’s predominantly pasture-based systems.

 

AdobeStock_519511848_resized
Methane_Challenge_resized

The role of Artificial Intelligence and Automation

Sam sees huge potential in AI to help manage and utilise the plethora of farm data.

“We get so much data from different places. If AI could scan, condense, and send tailored reports directly to feed mills, semen resellers, or pasture specialists – that could be a game changer.”

With fewer people willing to take on the physical work of dairying, she believes automation and AI are the future – attracting tech-minded recruits interested in programming, robotics, and remote sensing.

Sam explains, “AI and automation won’t negate the need for labour requirements on farm, it simply changes the nature of the labour that is needed to operate various aspects of the farm business.  It’s possible that the skills needed to operate in these new areas don’t currently exist, so an education platform may need to be developed to cater to this”.

 

Opportunities for UK – Australia collaboration

Both producers see clear opportunities for UK innovators – but with a caveat. Whether it’s orchard scanners or dairy AI, solutions must be tailored to Australia’s climates, management systems, and regulatory context.

International partnerships already exist – Sam’s role with Dairy Australia’s DataGene involves collaborating with US, Canadian, and Irish researchers on genomic testing – but not all learnings translate directly. “In some areas, our systems are similar, but in reality, it doesn’t always translate. We need more collaboration that’s truly fit-for-purpose.”

As a part of the webinar, Agri-TechE members will also have an opportunity to speak with representatives from Australia Research and Development Corporations (RDCs), Hort Innovation and Dairy Australia. Members will learn what opportunities exist to engage with these RDCs and what topics or challenges the are looking to address.

Interested in joining the conversation? Register now for the webinar on Monday, 15 September 2025 here.

New project explores potential of soil microbes to achieve UK net zero goals

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Researchers are combining the latest science in climate forecasting and soil science to understand how land use management could enable soil carbon storage.

A new collaborative project called ‘OpenLAND: Open evaluation of climate-resilient interventions for land management, soil health and net zero’ has been funded by UKRI. The project brings together partners from all over the UK including the Earlham Institute.

The UK government has committed to achieving net zero by 2050. This means the total emissions produced are equal to the emissions removed from the atmosphere. 

This year marks a major milestone in climate negotiations, as countries gear up to meet in Belém, Brazil for COP30; the 30th meeting of countries signed up to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). This vast conference has been billed as one of the last opportunities to overcome barriers to climate action – tackling key topics such as climate financing and raising countries’ climate ambitions.

One of the major contributors to UK emissions is the agri-food system – accounting for almost a quarter of UK greenhouse gas emissions. Research which contributes to solutions that can reduce and mitigate emissions from the agri-food system could have major implications on the ability for the UK to achieve the target of net zero by 2050.

Scientists at the Earlham Institute will contribute a deeper understanding of the role of soil microbial communities in carbon storage. Providing expertise in cutting edge methodologies for studying microbes, Dr Falk Hildebrand and Dr Chris Quince, both Group Leaders at the Earlham Institute and Quadram Institute, will together explore key research questions:

  • How do soil microbial communities contribute to carbon storage?
  • How does different land uses impact soil microbes and their contribution to carbon storage?
  • Can soil microbial communities be restored to healthy populations from highly degraded environments?

Dr Falk Hildebrand said: “Our plan is to employ some of the cutting-edge sequencing & AI technologies developed at the Earlham Institute, to determine the optimal microbial communities that can effectively sequester atmospheric carbon, during the reversion to pristine land use.”

The project will be benefitted by the breadth of expertise in microbial genomics, data science, and technology development at the Earlham Institute, Quadram Institute, and University of East Anglia – co-located on the Norwich Research Park.

Project partners:

Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research (project co-lead); University of East Anglia (project co-lead); The British Trust for Ornithology; Newcastle University; The Quadram Institute; The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Sayers & Partners; Science and Technology Facilities Council; UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology; University of Leeds, University of Plymouth


  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.