Patenting, Trademarks, Copyright, Trade Secrets...
In the next installment of our micro-learning series, we’ll explore potential legal solutions to help you keep your ideas safe and sound.

EU-UK dynamic alignment: what farmers need to know

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

As discussions progress between the UK and the EU on a new Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) agreement, one proposal is gaining particular attention across UK agriculture: dynamic alignment. This would involve the UK voluntarily aligning with EU rules for plant health and pesticide regulation from June 2027.

While the proposal aims to simplify trade, the consequences for crop protection, compliance, and farm business planning could be significant. We provide a clear summary of what we know so far and what farming clients should be preparing for.

What is Dynamic Alignment?

Dynamic alignment is not a single agreement, but rather a broader regulatory framework in which the UK agrees to follow EU rules in selected areas, updating in real time as the EU updates its regulations.

For agriculture, the proposed SPS agreement focuses heavily on:

  • Plant health regulations
  • Pesticide approval processes
  • Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs)
  • Border and export protocols

If adopted, this would bring UK regulatory systems significantly closer to those of the EU.

Why is it being considered?

The primary goals are to:

  • Reduce friction at borders
  • Simplify export of agri‑food goods
  • Improve regulatory cooperation
  • Reduce the risk of shipment rejections

From a trade perspective, alignment could remove many of the current barriers faced by UK growers exporting into the EU, especially those who rely on chemistry‑sensitive supply chains.

Key Risks for UK Growers

Loss of Active Ingredients

Alignment could mean immediate or phased removal of GB-only approvals.
The NFU warns that alignment in June 2027 could:

  • Remove four recently approved GB‑only actives (e.g. isoflucypram, pydiflumetofen)
  • Ban 18 additional actives used in 100+ GB crop protection products
  • Accelerate losses as the EU conducts ongoing reviews (e.g. flutolanil, phenmedipham, fludioxonil)

Glyphosate Restrictions

New EU limits include:

  • A maximum of 1.44 kg/ha/year
  • Restrictions on pre‑harvest desiccation

GB currently still permits pre‑harvest use — but alignment may remove this.

MRL Conflicts

One of the most concerning risks for growers:

  • Crops treated legally in the UK in 2026/27 may exceed EU MRLs after alignment
  • This affects stored crops, in‑transit crops, and processed goods
  • Farmers could be left with unsellable stocks

This risk is particularly acute for combinable crops, potatoes, veg, and fruit destined for EU-linked markets.

Potential Benefits

The alignment is not entirely negative:

  • Reduced border checks could cut delays and costs
  • Access to 20+ EU-approved actives, many of them biopesticides
  • Ability to use EU systems such as mutual recognition and free movement of treated seeds

These may support integrated pest management strategies and offer new, lower‑risk products.

Potential Alignment Scenarios and Considerations for Farmers Right Now

Whilst we don’t know how this potential alignment will play out just yet, there are several options being considered. It is possible that the UK will fully adopt the EU rules as soon as the SPS agreement goes live. The UK may adopt the agreement but with some delay, or they may manage the alignment alongside existing GB approval renewal dates so that at renewal, GB and EU decisions are then harmonised at that point in time. For growers now, this means:

  1. Consider market exposure  – any business selling through EU-facing supply chains or storing long-life commodities should review contracts that extend into 2027/28 and consider MRL requirements and future spray programmes.
  2. Stock management – If commonly used actives are banned, on-farm stock may become unusable and so forward purchasing should be approached cautiously.
  3. Cropping plans – For crops at high risk of MRL or chemistry loss, consider alternative actives (or stay abreast of developments), varietal strategies and IPM options.

Summary

The EU–UK dynamic alignment proposal could reshape farm regulation in one of the most significant ways since Brexit. While it promises smoother trade and access to new biological products, the risks, particularly surrounding pesticide withdrawals and MRL compliance, are substantial and could impact cropping, marketing, and agronomic decisions as early as 2026.

Joining Ceres Research as a member gives you direct access to timely insights such as these, as we continue to monitor developments and share any early signs of how the UK wish to proceed, in Monthly Agronomy Clubs or Digests- keeping you informed and ahead in a rapidly evolving sector. 

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

LettUs Grow joins QuBOOSTR Consortium to pioneer UK glasshouse rubber production

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Bristol, UK – LettUs Grow is proud to announce its participation in QuBOOSTR. This £2.4m precision breeding project is a collaboration between lead partner QuberTech, the John Innes Centre and LettUs Grow. The initiative is funded by the UK Government Defra’s Farming Innovation Programme and delivered in partnership with Innovate UK.

The QuBOOSTR project aims to domesticate dandelions, a plant that naturally produces latex in its root system, as a sustainable source of rubber for the UK. Historically, dandelion latex levels were too low to be commercially viable. However, this consortium is leveraging gene editing and analytical tools to optimise the plants for higher-grade production at scale. By combining the John Innes Centre’s world-leading plant science with QuberTech’s gene-editing expertise and LettUs Grow’s Advanced Aeroponics™ technology, the partnership will optimise the crop for high-density, soil-less indoor farming.

For LettUs Grow, this project represents a significant expansion of aeroponic applications into “opportunity crops”. Our Aeroponic Rolling Bench™ technology provides the precise, soil-free environment necessary to enhance root growth and allow for the clean and easy access required to harvest and study latex-producing roots. By proving the efficacy of aeroponics for industrial crops, we are opening new doors for commercial growers to diversify beyond food into high-value industrial commodities.

“LettUs Grow are very excited to commence this Innovate UK project, using our unique Aeroponic Rolling Bench technology to support Qubertech in their mission to boost resilience of the global rubber supply. By boosting crop performance and enabling clean and easy access to the crop roots, we believe this exciting R&D could further expand the market for high-tech glasshouse operators worldwide.” – Jack Farmer, Co-Founder and CSO of LettUs Grow.

£2.5m project launches first precision-bred oilseed rape on commercial farms in Europe

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

A £2.5m, three-year project bringing the first precision-bred oilseed rape onto commercial farms in Europe has been launched this week, marking a major step towards rebuilding the UK’s most important break crop.

The project, Light Leaf Spot Enhancing Resistance And reducing Susceptibility with EDiting (LLS-ERASED), is led by the British On-Farm Innovation Network (BOFIN) and funded through Defra’s Farming Innovation Programme, delivered in partnership with Innovate UK. It brings together farmers, plant breeders, crop scientists and agronomists to tackle light leaf spot, oilseed rape’s most damaging disease, using precision breeding alongside new disease-management tools.

Light leaf spot has become the number one disease threat to UK oilseed rape, with yield losses estimated to have risen from £94m in 2017 to more than £300m in 2022. Despite widespread fungicide use, control has become increasingly unreliable as pathogen populations evolve and resistance to azole fungicides spreads. At the same time, currently available varieties struggle to offer strong, durable resistance.

LLS-ERASED aims to change that by delivering oilseed rape varieties with significantly reduced susceptibility to light leaf spot, developed using precision-breeding techniques that accelerate the introduction of beneficial traits without introducing foreign DNA. Crucially, the project will move these traits beyond the laboratory and into farmer-led field trials on commercial farms, supported by real-time disease forecasting and decision-support tools.

“This project is game-changing for farmers,” says LLS-ERASED project lead Tom Allen-Stevens, founder and managing director of BOFIN.

“It will put precision-bred oilseed rape technology on to their farms for the first time across Europe. This is combined with risk forecasting and a new decision support tool that will bring growers effective disease control that is truly risk-based and data-driven. That is the reboot the industry needs, and that is what will help reverse the decline in the crop’s planted area.”

At the heart of the project is a newly identified plant susceptibility gene. By switching off this gene using precision breeding, researchers have shown it is possible to reduce the ability of the light leaf spot pathogen to infect the crop, offering a more durable form of protection than traditional resistance genes that pathogens can quickly overcome.

The science is being led by John Innes Centre and the University of Hertfordshire, working alongside ADAS and Scottish Agronomy to integrate the new trait into practical, farm-ready disease-management strategies. A consortium of leading UK and European oilseed rape breeders is involved in developing the disease-forecasting and testing material in elite commercial backgrounds. UK Agri-Tech Centre is overseeing project delivery and integration, supporting effective collaboration across partners and ensuring outputs remain focused on adoption, scalability and real-world impact.

A key element of the project is collaboration with US-based Cibus (NASDAQ: CBUS), whose Rapid Trait Development System™ (RTDS®), a suite of technologies including non-transgenic processes, enables precise genetic edits to be introduced directly into elite breeding lines with scale and speed, dramatically shortening the time needed to bring new traits to market.

“I am really excited to move our resistant material from the laboratory to field scale trials to see how it performs in a real-world setting,” says LLS-ERASED technical lead Dr Rachel Wells of John Innes Centre.

“Precision Breeding offers us an excellent opportunity to develop material to combat our pests and pathogens while supporting sustainable farming. Developing a trusted pipeline to streamline the process from research to variety release will be invaluable for crop improvement. Bringing this work together in an integrated pest management package looking at multiple, combined solutions, is the future of crop protection.”

For airborne diseases like light leaf spot, information on timing of pathogen spore release and virulence in pathogen populations is essential for effective disease control, adds Yongju Huang, Professor of plant pathology at University of Hertfordshire. “Combined with host resistance information about the pathogen, this project will develop an evidence-based real-time decision support system for farmers to achieve effective disease control and reduce the reliance on chemicals.”

Alongside new varieties, LLS-ERASED will deliver a farmer-led delivery platform designed to support the adoption of precision-bred crops. This includes a new disease-management tool combining weather data, pathogen monitoring and on-farm trial results to guide fungicide use more accurately, reducing unnecessary applications while protecting yield.

“The project offers a well-timed opportunity to focus on improving the control of light leaf spot, and the field-based guidance available,” comments Dr Faye Ritchie, technical director at ADAS. “Farmer collaboration and knowledge is essential to build effective disease management tools and IPM testing protocols that are practical and cost-effective.”

Farmers will play a central role in LLS-ERASED through on-farm trials across England, feeding results directly into a grower-led knowledge-exchange network. The approach is designed not only to bring the first precision-bred oilseed rape varieties to commercial farms, but also to establish a pipeline for future traits. This will include resistance to other diseases and pests such as cabbage stem flea beetle, which is widely reported as a major limiting factor for UK oilseed rape growers.

“By combining precision breeding with integrated disease management and farmer-led testing, the project positions the UK at the forefront of efforts to rebuild oilseed rape production in a more resilient, sustainable way,” says BOFIN’s Tom Allen-Stevens.

“What’s more, building on similar precision-breeding grower-led platforms, it establishes the UK as a world leader in the technology and an on-farm testbed for future traits. This has potential benefits for farm profitability, pesticide reduction and food security, not just for the UK, but across Europe, as the EU moves towards greater acceptance of new genomic techniques.”

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Farmers: Share your views in a major European study on climate change and mycotoxins

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Climate change is reshaping farming practices – and with it, the risks linked to mycotoxin contamination.

To better understand today’s challenges in the field, the MYMATCH Project is collecting insights directly from farmers.

By sharing your experience, you will help us design practical, science‑based, digital tools to support mycotoxin risk management and build more resilient agricultural systems.

The survey takes 15-20 minutes to complete, and responses are requested by the end of May 2026.

👉 Here’s the survey link

📢 Your voice is essential to ensure solutions that truly meet farmers’ needs.

MYMATCH Project is a 4-year Horizon Europe project that aims to predict and mitigate food safety risks related to mycotoxins in agriculture.

Cranfield University is a MYMATCH Project partner, with several colleagues from the Magan Centre of Applied Mycology (MCAM) lending their expertise.

Here are our MYMATCH project partners:

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Università degli Studi di ParmaConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche – EXUS SOFTWARE LTD – Nemzeti Élelmiszerlánc-biztonsági Hivatal – Universidade do Minho –  VeterinærinstituttetAsociacion Valenciana de Agricultores AVA-Asaja – Euroquality – Tinexta Innovation Hub

Thank you for your support.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

How we support the creation of new businesses from early-stage science-based research

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Maximising the impact of the publicly-funded research being conducted at Norwich Research Park is one of the core aims of Anglia Innovation Partnership, the campus management organisation. One of the ways in which we do this is by helping scientists and researchers to translate their ideas for a business into reality.

We have been successful in doing this over the last couple of years thanks to our incubator programme which has seen 17 companies receive practical and intellectual support and advice. In addition, 40 other companies are actively receiving wider enterprise support to aid their development.

Sam Graham, Enterprise Network Manager, Anglia Innovation Partnership, who runs the incubator programme, said, “Our role is to help them get their businesses off the ground and give them the best possible chance of success.”

“The incubator programme focuses on reducing the practical and structural barriers that early-stage founders face by improving access to suitable workspace and labs, helping them navigate funding opportunities and connecting them with scientific expertise right across the Park to support testing and validation of their business models.”

To read the full article, and find out more about the opportunities at Norwich Research Park please use this link: How we support the creation of new businesses from early-stage science-based research – Norwich Research Park

https://vimeo.com/norwichresearchpark

Biostimulants: Current Outlook and Challenges Ahead

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Biostimulants are gaining momentum in agriculture as innovative tools to potentially boost crop health, resilience, and yield. But what exactly are they, how do they work, and what hurdles remain before they become mainstream on UK farms? 

What Are Biostimulants? 

Biostimulants are substances or microorganisms applied to plants, seeds, or soil to enhance nutrition efficiency, stress tolerance, and crop quality – regardless of their own nutrient content. Unlike traditional fertilisers, their main role isn’t to feed plants directly but to help crops make better use of available resources and cope with environmental stresses. 

The Regulatory Landscape 

The rules around biostimulants are evolving. In the UK, there’s no dedicated regulation for these products. If a biostimulant is marketed as a fertiliser or contains significant nutrients, it falls under existing fertiliser laws. If it’s mixed with pesticides or claims to protect against pests, stricter regulations may apply. This patchwork of rules means the market is crowded, with varying product claims and little standardisation in providing evidence of efficacy. 

Types of Biostimulants 

Biostimulants fall into two main groups: 

  • Microbial: These include beneficial fungi and bacteria that interact with plant roots. 
  • Non-microbial: This group covers a wide range, such as humic substances (from decomposed organic matter), protein hydrolysates (amino acids and peptides), seaweed extracts, plant extracts, biopolymers like chitosan, and certain inorganic compounds (e.g., silicon, selenium). 

How Do They Work? 

Research shows biostimulants can help crops withstand drought, salinity, and temperature extremes, improve nutrient uptake, and boost yields. However, their effects are often variable and depend on local conditions. Scientists are still unravelling the exact mechanisms, but they can include stimulating soil microbes, enhance water retention, and triggering plant stress responses. 

Key Challenges 

Despite their promise, several challenges currently slow the adoption of biostimulants: 

  • Variable Results: Biostimulants can have less consistent outcomes than conventional fertilisers. Their effectiveness depends on matching the right product to the right problem and local conditions. 
  • Lack of Independent Evidence: Much of the available data comes from manufacturers or overseas trials, making it hard for UK farmers to judge what will work on their land. 
  • Regulatory Confusion: With no unified definition or regulation, comparing products and ensuring quality is difficult, which can undermine trust. 

Practical Tips for Farmers and Growers 

  • Seek Independent Evidence: Look for peer-reviewed studies and experiments and be cautious of bold claims without robust backing. 
  • Start Small: Trial biostimulants on a limited area before wider use. 
  • Stay Informed: The science and regulations are evolving—keep up with the latest research and guidance. 

Want to go deeper?

For a comprehensive, evidence-based review—including detailed mechanisms, regulatory updates, and peer-reviewed research—Ceres Research Members can access the full report here: “Biostimulants 101.” 

If you’re not a member, consider joining here for access to the latest research and expert insights. Agri-TechE Members receive 10% off our membership under the Members Discount Scheme!

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Seeing nitrogen from space: Real world results from hyperspectral imaging

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

UK farmers are invited to examine new evidence on the use of hyperspectral satellite imaging to inform nitrogen management, at a webinar on Thursday 26 February (8.30am).

The British On-Farm Innovation Network (BOFIN) is working with agri-tech company Messium to explore how this next-generation satellite technology performs on commercial farms and the value it can realistically deliver.

Unlike conventional satellite imagery such as NDVI, which measures crop greenness or biomass, hyperspectral imaging can detect the specific wavelengths associated with nitrogen concentration in the crop itself.

“Previous satellite tools couldn’t tell whether a crop was short of nitrogen or just low biomass,” explained Messium CEO George Marangos-Gilks. “Hyperspectral satellites can now do both. That allows us to identify where crops are under or over-fertilised and where nitrogen is likely to lead to an uplift in yield.”

Messium’s approach is underpinned by more than 21,000 crop samples analysed in laboratories and linked to satellite imagery to train its models. Independent blind testing has shown accuracy of around 85% compared with lab results, with further UK validation underway.

Results from more than 150 on-farm trials across the northern hemisphere suggest the technology can help farmers move closer to optimum nitrogen levels. Across its trials, Messium reported a net profit benefit in 65% of cases, with an average yield uplift of 0.3t/ha and margin improvements of around £50/ha.

The live online Q&A session will be held at 8.30am on Thursday February 26. It will include side-by-side comparisons with NDVI imagery and a discussion on costs, complexity and where hyperspectral data may add value. Hosted by Tom Allen-Stevens, Oxfordshire farmer and founder of BOFIN, the session will focus on the farmer experience with input from growers who have first-hand experience of Messium’s technology.

“Nitrogen is one of the biggest cost, productivity and environmental levers on farm, so any tool claiming better insight needs proper scrutiny,” said Tom. “This session is about looking at the evidence, the limitations and how it works in practice on real farms.”

To register for the live Q&A visit https://tinyurl.com/messiumwebinar26

 

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Free Open Online Course “Integrating Food and Energy Production on Farmland” launched

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

A new online course “Integrating Food and Energy Production on Farmland” has just launched. Developed by the University of Reading as part of the EU funded project Value4Farm (https://value4farm.eu) it aims to build an understanding of the ways in which crop and renewable energy production can be integrated on farmland and explores the innovative ways farmers are combining crops with solar panels in agrivoltaic systems and producing biogas. 

Aimed at farmers, it explores how agrivoltaics and biogas production technologies fit alongside traditional farming. It allows learners to discover what works (and what doesn’t) and understand the real benefits and challenges farmers face when integrating energy production on their farms. 

The ecological and technical benefits of these renewable energy systems and how they impact the whole farm ecosystem from soil health to food production are explored alongside the support available to implement these technologies. The course also looks at how policy, regulations and legislation shape what’s possible on farms and how they can influence renewable energy adoption. Through providing information on farming practices and on the possibilities of renewable-based solutions, the course aims to support farmers in making suitable choices for their farm and situation. 

The course is available for free through FutureLearn – Integrating Food and Energy Production on Farmland – Online Course and runs over 2 weeks of self-directed learning. You can start, study and complete the course when it suits you. The course has also been accredited by EIT Food (EIT Label | EIT Food Learning Services) and learners successfully completing the course will receive a Certificate of Achievement. 

We look forward to welcoming you on to the course! 

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

It’s time for Ecosystem Intelligence

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

At Hypernature, we’re pursuing a bold mission: to give ecosystems intelligence.

What does that mean? It means enabling ecosystems to sense, interpret, and adapt for themselves — not as passive assets we manage, but as dynamic systems with their own capacity to understand and respond to change. In practice, ecosystem intelligence becomes a new ecosystem function. A kind of nervous system. A new category of infrastructure.

If that sounds “out there,” it shouldn’t. To us, this feels like the natural evolution of human intelligence technologies applied to ecological systems. At some point, the tools we build to manage, understand and report on ecosystems begin to merge with the ecosystems themselves. This could even mark a new evolutionary transition for life on Earth (Smith & Szathmary, 1997)

The ecosystem intelligence perspective avoids the limitations of narrower foci like “business intelligence,” “nature intelligence,” or “climate intelligence.” These approaches optimise for isolated metrics, carbon, yield, biodiversity, compliance – but ecosystems don’t operate in silos. What we want is for all components of an ecosystem to thrive — jobs, production, communities, soil, biodiversity, climate resilience. Fragmented intelligence can’t deliver that.

At Hypernature, we bring decades of experience building intelligence systems that automate predictions and recommendations for complex adaptive systems. Again and again, we’ve seen ecosystems managed through narrow, oversimplified lenses — even when the real bottleneck is the absence of a system‑level perspective.

This is why we believe it’s time to build infrastructure for the ecosystem itself — a shared intelligence layer that businesses, governments, and communities can build on to make better decisions and adapt together.

So what is ecosystem intelligence made of? A hybrid of silicon‑based computation and human/institutional intelligence (land stewards, regulators, businesses, communities) giving the ecosystem the ability to sense, actuate, interpret, reason, coordinate, and adapt.

Crucially, ecosystem intelligence is notabout measuring everything or building perfect digital twins. Ecosystems are messy, incomplete, and full of uncertainty — and yet we know a great deal about how they behave.

Intelligence means making good decisions with imperfect information and recognising that desirable future states may look nothing like the present (Gunderson & Holling, 2002). Think of a degraded landscape today versus what it could become in ten years.

There is also a deep technical connection between ecosystem intelligence and the next generation of AI. The frontier of AI is moving toward world models — systems that understand and reason about the world, not just pattern‑match. This ability to interpret, predict, and reason across scales is central to ecosystem intelligence. And it’s something we’ve spent decades building and training models to do for complex adaptive systems.

One challenge with many “nature intelligence” approaches is the assumption that nature is separate from us. We see that as outdated and unhelpful. Humans are part of most ecosystems, and ecosystem intelligence requires understanding the roles our species can play within them — not pretending we sit outside them. Our relationship with living systems is still primitive. Many of the ecosystems we will eventually thrive within don’t even exist yet. Ecosystem intelligence can help us design and realise these new, resilient, productive systems (synthetic ecology, anyone?).

So where is ecosystem intelligence most needed now?

Three obvious candidates would be top of a priority list (though there are many more):

  • Global agrifood supply chains — highly exposed to ecological volatility, globally interconnected, and under pressure to transform while remaining productive.
  • Cities — which must continue delivering essential services while reinventing how they sustain themselves.
  • Degraded landscapes— over a billion hectares that need to be rebuilt into resilient, functioning ecosystems.

It’s time to think seriously about — and start building — ecosystem intelligence.

References

Smith & Szathmary. The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, 1997.

Gunderson & Holling. Panarchy : understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, 2002.

Designing Hybrid User Interfaces: Bridging the Physical and Digital

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

As devices become increasingly complex and connected, user interfaces are being relied upon to bridge the gap between the physical and digital parts of a system. This often leads to hybrid interfaces, a blend of physical controls and digital displays. 

From complex medical equipment to dynamic pieces of consumer tech, hybrid interfaces must provide the user with the confidence and reliability of physical controls as well as the flexibility of digital displays. All must be done whilst avoiding user confusion, workflow disruption and hazards. So, how do you get the right balance?

Why are hybrid interfaces necessary?

Can’t we just put everything on a touchscreen these days? Not quite.

Physical controls provide real, tactile feedback that confirm an action has been performed without requiring visual confirmation. This tactile response reduces uncertainty and builds muscle memory for frequent and critical tasks. Hence, physical buttons are still common and necessary in medical devices, handheld tools and most vehicles.

On the other hand, digital touchscreen interfaces offer flexibility. They allow settings and controls to be stacked and hidden to reduce cognitive overload. They can also change dynamically in response to a change in user needs or the context and environment of use. This makes them ideal for devices that need to present the user with different options at different times without overwhelming the user with clutter.

When combined, these strengths highlight the value of a hybrid interface. By pairing the tactile certainty of buttons with the adaptability of touchscreens, hybrid systems can support reliable operation for critical tasks whilst still offering the flexibility to present context‑specific options when needed. This balance reduces cognitive load, prevents interface clutter, and ensures that users can work efficiently across a range of situations.

What makes a good hybrid interface?

A successful hybrid interface should feel like a single, unified system, not two separate interfaces glued together. For example, digital cameras combine physical controls for common functions (capture, focus and zoom) with digital controls for more specific tasks (mode switching and image review).

What makes a poor hybrid interface?

Hybrid interfaces can fail when the relationship between the physical and digital elements contradicts user expectations. Common issues include:

  • Poor mapping
    When a physical action (pressing a button) does not trigger a clear digital response (an on-screen confirmation), users can be left uncertain as to whether the system has registered their input, causing confusion and eroding trust in the interface.
  • Inefficient layouts
    When physical controls are positioned awkwardly, users may struggle to operate them whilst maintaining visibility of the screen. This can lead to unnecessary hand movements, breaking the flow of interaction and slowing down task completion.
  • Crowded layouts
    Clusters of buttons placed too close together increase the risk of accidental activation. Users may press the wrong control, especially under pressure or in environments where precision is difficult, specifically when wearing PPE.
  • Wrong controls for the wrong tasks
    Assigning tasks to inappropriate controls can severely impact usability. For instance, requiring precision adjustments to be made via on-screen sliders rather than tactile controls can make fine-tuning cumbersome and frustrating.
  • Sizing issues
    Controls that are too small to see clearly or too fiddly to operate compromise accessibility and efficiency. This can be particularly problematic in high-stress environments or for users with limited dexterity.
  • Ignoring environmental factors
    External conditions such as glare on screen, vibration or background noise can interfere with usability. If these factors aren’t considered during the design, the interface may become unreliable or even unusable in real-world settings.

How to develop successful hybrid interfaces

1. Start with task analysis
Begin by identifying the tasks your users need to perform. Consider how frequently these tasks occur and which ones are critical to their workflow. Assess the environment in which the interface will be used, such as lighting conditions, noise levels, stress factors, and whether personal protective equipment (PPE) is involved. It is also important to account for user limitations, including dexterity and physical strength.

2. Map the workflow
Understand the user journeys and pinpoint key touchpoints. Aim to minimise unnecessary hand travel or repositioning by arranging controls so that physical actions are spatially aligned with digital feedback and guidance. This helps create a seamless interaction between physical and digital elements.

3. Keep it simple and intuitive
Design controls so that each one serves a single function wherever possible. Use clear labelling, colour coding, and logical grouping to make navigation straightforward. Provide immediate feedback for critical actions and incorporate multisensory cues such as tactile, visual, and audible signals. Align your design with users’ mental models and familiar patterns to reduce cognitive load. Avoid duplicating controls or overwhelming users with excessive information.

4. Early user testing and iteration
Validate your assumptions early in the design process and continue testing throughout development. Frequent iteration ensures that the interface evolves based on real user feedback, leading to a more effective and user-friendly solution.

How to test hybrid interfaces with users

Testing hybrid interfaces is more complex than pure digital interfaces because they involve multiple inputs and outputs, used across varied contexts.

Key considerations:

  • Map out the full workflow and all interaction points, use this as a testing ‘checklist’
  • Use printed wireframes on physical prototypes to mimic a digital screen layout
  • Apply think-aloud protocols to capture user expectations during use
  • Simulate the environment of use (e.g. variable lighting, PPE, motion, etc)
  • Track mode switching (are users favouring physical or digital controls?)
  • Combine prototyping techniques (e.g. 3D printed buttons, paper mock ups, interactive screen, etc)
Hybrid Interfaces User Testing

The future of hybrid interfaces

We can expect even more complex integration challenges as hybrid interfaces evolve further to include AI driven features such as voice control inputs. The definition of ‘hybrid’ is expanding, it is blending traditional controls with intelligent, adaptive systems. Understanding user expectations, tasks and workflows will be more critical than ever. We, as designers, must ensure that interfaces can successfully bridge the physical and digital divide and create a cohesive, intuitive experience that supports user confidence, safety and efficiency.

Get in touch

To discuss how our skilled team can optimise your product’s user interface, please get in touch.

Contact us via email on design@egtechnology.co.uk, by giving us a call on +44 01223 813184, or by clicking here.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Norwich Research Park companies pass £100m investment milestone

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Companies currently based at Norwich Research Park, whether spinouts, spin-ins or start-ups, have collectively achieved over £100m of funding, raised from public funds and private investors.

Roz Bird, CEO, Anglia Innovation Partnership, said, “With great facilities, and a specialist skills pool, Norwich Research Park is quickly becoming known for its ability to support high-growth companies in agri-food, health, nutrition and the environment. It is great to recognise the level of private investment attracted into our start-ups. This encourages us all to continue to work hard to ensure Norwich Research Park remains one of the very best places to start and grow a company in the global markets we serve.”

Read the full article, live on our website now: Norwich Research Park companies pass £100m investment milestone – Norwich Research Park

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Agri-TechE in conversation with Elsoms

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Agri-TechE’s Belinda Clarke met with Elsoms’ Head of Research and Lab Services, Rodrigo Echegoye, to discuss their latest projects involving swede, squash, and purple-sprouting broccoli.

Join them in the Elsoms glasshouse!

Filmed January 2026.