Better Origin insect farm raises $3M to provide alternative protein for animal feed

Meet the Network
Agri-TechE

Insect protein provides a sustainable alternative to soy. Cambridge-based Better Origin has raised $3m to fund the development of its product X1, an AI enabled insect mini-farm.

insect protein Better Origin
Fotis Fotiadis, founder and CEO of Better Origin says the insect min-farm is a scaleable solution

X1 fits inside a shipping container and according to Better Origin, it is the world’s first autonomous insect mini-farm. It uses black soldier fly (BSF, Hermetia illucens)  to convert waste biomass, such as food waste into insect biomass that is rich in proteins and fats. It has been tried and tested on chicken farms where the larvae are harvested and fed directly to chickens.
The black soldier fly (BSF, Hermetia illucens) is a species of fly present in most parts of the world, known for its voracious appetite and rapid growth, making it perfect for converting waste into high value protein.
The entire process is automated through AI – from delivery of the food waste through to monitoring of  larvae growth, temperature, and humidity. When they are ready to harvest, the farmer is notified and the larvae can be fed to the hens.
Better Origin’s founder and CEO, Fotis Fotiadis, explains that the modular, distributed approach will accelerate adoption and remove barriers to entry for millions of farmers around the world.
“The agricultural industry has traditionally been reliant on unsustainable animal feeds such as soy, which is the leading contributor to deforestation around the world and travels for thousands of miles, generating high amounts of carbon emissions. And it does not stop there – it is estimated that 33% of arable land on the planet is used to produce livestock feed.
“Insect feed is an emerging alternative which offers a sustainable and natural feed solution for farmed animals, such as chickens and fish, with benefits that include increased productivity, better health, and higher welfare.”
The funding will accelerate Better Origin’s scaling operation and enable it to deploy more systems across the UK.
The project is backed by Fly Ventures, a Berlin-based VC firm that invests in deep technology and AI-driven venture start-ups.
Matt Wichrowski, who led Fly’s investment in Better Origin, comments: “We were blown away by the progress Fotis, Miha, and their team have made, and we believe in the sector’s potential to transform the food industry. We are delighted to back the team and support them over this next phase of growth.”
Better Origin’s vision is to help secure the future of food by offering an alternative protein that doesn’t cost the Earth. The company aims to upcycle upwards of 50,000 tonnes of organic waste and mitigate as much as 100,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year by 2023.
More information about Better Origin.

What Roles & Career Routes Exist in AgriTech – and is an Agri background normally required?

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Working as a Recruiter in AgriTech, naturally people often ask me what type of roles I find myself recruiting for. We also collaborate and provide advice to various academic bodies and institutions in this space and, in a similar vein, are also asked; what kind of career opportunities exist in this world?  Is it a career route people should be actively looking to pursue? Do you need a farming background to build a career in this domain?

The truth is that, just like in other tech driven sectors, the nature of roles that arise can be highly varied, weird & wonderful. Some of course may require an agri / farming specific skillset, but there’s a plethora of others that don’t. Below is a (by no means exhaustive!) snapshot:

  • Roles of a STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics) discipline. The demand for staff with a STEM background has increased hugely in the AgTech sector in recent years. In most cases, an Agri background is not needed for roles of this nature, a successful candidate is just as likely to have built up their skillset from experience in other sectors. This category covers a wide range of roles, and it is here that we’re referring to the likes of Software Developers, Data Scientists, AI Specialists, Engineers (Electronic, Mechanical, etc…), Scientists of various specialisms and more.
  • Senior Leadership posts. Covering up to C Level. These roles exist across organisations of all types but are arising regularly at the moment in the AgTech space as so many start-ups and SMEs are emerging in the sector. Upon reaching growth point the first steps of a start-up will often be to recruit for the senior staff that can head up various parts of their business – this could include Chief Technology Officers, Commercial Directors, Heads of Product, even CEOs. Whether or not you’ll require an Agri sector background depends completely on the role type here – naturally, something tech oriented like a CTO often won’t, whereas a more commercially oriented post may require somebody with a background and extensive contacts in the space.
  • Commercial posts. Here we’re talking about Sales, Business Development, Account Management, anything client focused… I would also include roles in areas such as Customer Success in this. At the moment it’s common for a hiring company to want an Agri sector background (as mentioned previously, somebody who has contacts in this space). This does seem to be changing though, especially in roles that relate to a tech product or service – in these cases employers may be more interested in somebody with a tech sector background, or might consider somebody from one or the other (Agri or Tech).
  • The ‘In Between’ roles. There are some roles that arise regularly that aren’t purely tech / STEM focused, but neither are they purely commercial – roles that will sometimes bridge the gap between the two. This is where I would place the likes of Product specialists and Project Managers. Candidates may need to have some nous in both areas – so will be comfortable liaising with clients, but are also able to understand & translate tech concepts without necessarily being a hands on expert. It really depends on the client and exact role nature when it comes to whether or not an Agri background is required – some clients will value more a background that relates to the nature of the product (whether that’s Software, Data, AI, Engineering, etc), whereas others will stipulate an existing understanding of the Agri domain.
  • Agri Specific posts. Certain roles within AgriTech companies will require an Agri / Farming background, in the same way that some FinTech companies might sometimes need to hire a finance expert, or a HealthTech company may require the expertise of people with a medical background. Recent examples for us include Agronomists, and a Trials Manager position for a company looking to trial their tech solutions out in a real farming environment.

In summary, for anybody interested in this space and the opportunity to work in a sector that can have a genuinely positive impact on the world, there are career opportunities aplenty… whether you’re of an Agri background or not. Don’t let a lack of an Agri background deter you!

The Economics of Biodiversity – Nature, productivity and growth

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

Productivity. Growth. Nature. These words seem to come up regularly in conversation with farmers – and, crucially, they are talking about how to maximise the first two without compromising the latter.

These words are also key pillars of a recent report (Feb 2021) from the University of Cambridge which aims to change policy and practice in order to put nature’s value at the heart of economics.
The 600 page report is a hefty read, but Chapter 16 focusses particularly on food production, biofuel generation and changes to the food system.

The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review

Professor Sir Partha Dasgupta’s review presents the first comprehensive economic framework of its kind for biodiversity. The government press announcement says “it calls for urgent and transformative change in how we think, act and measure economic success to protect and enhance our prosperity and the natural world”.

This is welcome news for the UK industry, where increasing emphasis on delivery of ecosystem services is counter-balanced by lack of clarity about the business model needed to translate ‘natural’ capital into tangible financial value.

Commissioned by the UK Treasury, the report ‘The Economics of Biodiversity’ by Prof Sir Partha Dasgupta is expected to set the agenda for the 25 Year Environment Plan, as well as challenge the way economies and governments traditionally view ‘growth’.

Economists have historically excluded Nature from their economic models. Yet the Dasgupta report argues that long-term prosperity relies on balancing our demand for natural goods and services with Nature’s ability to supply them. The numbers are stark. In the period of 1992 to 2014, the produced capital per person doubled globally, while the stock of natural capital declined by 40%.
New, alternative metrics for success are needed to define growth and productivity, and they need to focus more on natural capital.

Measuring natural capital

As every forward-thinking farmer knows, however, so-called ‘sustainability metrics’ have been a huge challenge.

A current Holy Grail on farms is to establish how carbon storage, efficient water management, biodiversity enhancement and soils improvement can be measured, monitored and – crucially –  valued.

But progress is being made by a range of technology enablers – in the UK and internationally – towards developing natural capital measurement and valuation tools. This will be critical if we are to re-balance the supply and demand relationship with Nature.

Potential for agri-tech

Other agricultural technologies will also be crucial in helping this process, argues Dasgupta (abridged report p47). “Changing the biological capabilities of crops offers the possibility of using marginal land for production, improving crop resistance to pathogens, obtaining higher yield on existing farmland, and enhancing nutritional quality. Genetically modified crops remain controversial, even though prominent scientific bodies such as the Nuffield Council on Bioethics (NCB, 2003) continue to affirm their salience in a world with growing food needs.”

He contends that improving crop genetics using advanced breeding tools, adoption of precision agriculture approaches to reduce inputs such as nitrogen, and Integrated Pest Management, along with vertical farming and ‘cellular’ agriculture (for example for alternative meats production) are part of the solution.

Reconstructing global economics to include Nature as a key ingredient is a major task. Reconstructing the economics of agriculture through its constituent farm businesses is already underway. The journey has begun. Note: The Economics of Biodiversity – The Dasgupta Review
The Dasgupta Review is an independent, global review on the Economics of Biodiversity led by Professor Sir Partha Dasgupta (Frank Ramsey Professor Emeritus, University of Cambridge). The Review was commissioned in 2019 by HM Treasury and has been supported by an Advisory Panel drawn from public policy, science, economics, finance and business.

Is the future a carbon neutral basket of shopping? Asks Chris Brown at ASDA

Meet the Network
Agri-TechE

Chris is on the Agri-TechE Stakeholder committee and recently briefed delegates at a workshop for its members designed to create new thinking about the opportunities created by Net Zero for innovation.

“We’ve been talking about greenhouse gas emissions and I’ve been running GHG measurement on-farm for 15 years, but now its feels like there’s real momentum behind the conversation in terms of supply chains. For example, the EU has a proposal for a carbon tax for imports. So, there’s a clear focus from many directions.

“The ambition to eliminate carbon is great, and businesses are increasingly being asked to account for it. My own business is now under the streamlined energy and carbon reporting so for the first time our Scopes 1 and 2* are to be included in our financial reports.

“If you want a clear example of how important carbon is, we’ve been reporting carbon for the past three or four years but this is the first year I have had several accountants to actually audit what I’m presenting. It’s a big step on.”

Roadmap for moving towards Net Zero 

Chris explains that interest in Scope 3, which looks at carbon emissions in a business supply chain, has “suddenly shot up”:

“The supply chain also extends to our customers – the consumers – and they tell us very clearly that they expect us to help them reduce their waste. There is much investigation to understand what this could look like going forward.

“We’re part of the British Retail Consortium roadmap to be Net Zero by 2040, and that includes our agri supply chain. Agricultural and sourcing needs to respect and restore – so we’re doing a lot of work around natural capital and biodiversity, which also has to be taken into account.

“We will also have an ambition about being more regenerative – but first we need to have an understanding of what that means in practice and how to define it.

“I don’t personally see a future in which we’ll try to index the carbon account, because you end up having to work up how much evil you’re going to balance with good – a better alternative is to be more transparent about, for example, GHG emissions by product.

Carbon neutral basket of shopping

“I can see us having an ambition to talk about being a ‘carbon neutral basket of spend’ – i.e. products in the shopping basket balance out to carbon neutrality. Understanding what that might mean in terms of choices and the customer experience is complex.

“I recognise that the science isn’t developed and there’s a lot of conversation to be had over how that is calculated and presented. My customers spend 10-20 seconds in front of a shelf to make an informed choice – they’re not going to read a library of information on the back of a pack!

“We have very clear responses from market surveys: the customers expect us to make these choices on their behalf. If we ask, ‘do you want to pay more for a low-carbon product?’ the response we get back is ‘you wouldn’t sell me something that was high-carbon’.

“We need to be able to meet those customer expectations.

Potential future labelling were used by Method to stimulate discussion of the options for a Net Zero future
Potential future labelling were used by Method to stimulate discussion of the options for a Net Zero future

“However, I don’t think that will mean labels on products. This was trialled by the Carbon Trust a decade ago and it didn’t deliver as expected. Additionally, it can be difficult to interpret. About seven years ago we had a low carbon egg offer on our shelves, produced by renewable-powered free-ranged egg units – it was clearly marketed as a low carbon egg and sold very well.

“But the brutal reality is, if you wanted a low carbon egg, you’d have gone for a caged egg, because the carbon cost is that much lower than that of a free-range egg.

“My final comment is we need to find a way through communicating and taking our consumers with us which talks about understanding the trade-offs associated with a Net Zero future.

“Regrettably I don’t think there are many compromises in this – and so we’re going to need to face into some very clever innovation to be able to level out the market that we are all aiming to achieve.”

*GHG emissions are categorised into three groups, or ‘Scopes’:

Scope 1 covers direct emissions from owned or controlled sources.

Scope 2 covers indirect emissions from the generation of purchased electricity, steam, heating and cooling consumed by the reporting company.

Scope 3 includes all other indirect emissions that occur in a company’s value chain.

Find out more about GHG scopes at ghgprotocol.org

GHG Protocol - Diagram of scopes and emissions across the value chain
GHG Protocol – Diagram of scopes and emissions across the value chain [diagram from ghgprotocol.org]

Nitrogen enriched slurry to cut carbon footprint and boost yields

Meet the Network
Agri-TechE

“Our technology can cut the carbon footprint of a dairy farm by 27% and produce a valuable organic nitrogen fertiliser with three times the crop-available nitrogen in slurry,” explains Chris Puttick of N2 Applied. He is one of the speakers discussing alternatives to inorganic fertiliser at an Agri-TechE event “Putting the N Into FarmiNg” 24th March 2021.
Chris explains: “A high proportion of the greenhouse gas emissions of a dairy farm are from slurry. Slurry is a hazardous product as the fumes can be toxic and detrimental to air quality, human health and our environment.”

Organic liquid fertiliser

“Our technology overcomes these issues and converts by-products like slurry into a valuable nitrogen enriched organic liquid fertiliser, which we call NEO. The scalable technology fits within a 20ft shipping container on the farm.”
Nitrogen can be present in the environment in multiple forms, including the gases N2 and ammonia NH3, causing air pollution, N2O, a strong greenhouse gas, and as the salt nitrate NO3, which is soluble in water and a source of pollution. N2 Applied originates from Norway. The company has developed a unit which uses electricity to extract nitrogen from the air via plasma. Nitrogen is captured within slurry and enriches it.
As a result of the process, the output NEO is slightly acidic which increases its stability and reduces the amount of ammonia released whilst eliminating methane emissions.
The technology can also be used with the digestate, produced after anaerobic digestion (AD). As the AD plant is used to produce biogas, it is anticipated that some of this energy could be used to produce NEO, adding value to the digestate within a circular onfarm system.

Trials show available nitrogen three times higher than untreated slurry

Trials by ADAS have shown that NEO is stable, which means it can be applied to the growing crop in a wider range of weather conditions. Further trials with the Norway University of Applied Sciences show there is no risk of scorching the crop.
Total nitrogen (NH4, NO3 and NO2) needs to be considered within a nutrient management plan for the crop, and is particularly important where the farm lies within a nitrate vulnerable zone (NVZ).
Trials of NEO have shown that the nitrogen available to the crop is three times higher than untreated slurry and when applied to a grass sward increased the yield by 41% over two cuts.
Chris continues: “We have seen interest from industry members that have set climate targets to reduce the carbon footprint of their supply chains. We are receiving encouraging feedback that these businesses are serious about sustainability and willing to invest in a technology that will reduce on farm emissions significantly.
“The benefit for the livestock producer is a high value organic fertiliser that is more nutrient dense. A considerable amount of heat can be recycled from the plasma unit. This means that farmers can turn a by-product into a valuable commodity.”
Chris Puttick of N2 Applied will join other speakers Guðbjörg Rist of Atmonia and Andrew Neal of Rothamsted at the Agri-TechE event “Putting the N In FarmiNg—Solutions for On-Farm Nitrogen Production” on Wednesday 24th March from 2pm – 4pm.

On-farm fertiliser production comes out of a box

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

Would it be possible to produce nitrogen fertiliser on-farm and reduce the agricultural sector’s greenhouse gas emissions? Early-stage agri-tech companies Atmonia and N2 Applied say it is. They have developed alternative approaches to generating fertiliser in a shipping container using renewable energy sources, offering the potential for carbon neutral production.
Food production accounts for 26% of global greenhouse gas emissions*. Changing the way we produce and use nitrogen fertiliser would make a significant difference to these headline-grabbing figures, and this is to be discussed at the Agri-TechE event “Putting the N in FarmiNg — SolutioNs for On-Farm Nitrogen ProductioN”on 24th March 2021.

Renewable alternative to energy intensive Haber-Bosch

Guðbjörg Rist, the CEO of Atmonia, explains that current inorganic fertiliser production uses an energy intensive process.
“The Haber-Bosch process splits hydrogen from coal and natural gas, creating free hydrogen ions that combine with nitrogen gas in air to produce ammonia, a raw product for inorganic fertiliser production.
“Current ammonia production facilities are huge factories, producing millions of tonnes of ammonia, and double that amount of carbon dioxide.
“Our process takes a completely different approach: it uses an electro-chemical reaction to split nitrogen, which combines with hydrogen from air and water, removing the need for coal or natural gas. It also reduces the energy requirement, which can be sourced from renewables.
“Our facility is designed to produce hundreds of tonnes of ammonia from a unit the size of a shipping container, creating a liquid fertiliser that can be produced close to the point of need.”

Cutting the carbon footprint of dairy farm by 27%

Another greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N2O), is released when synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are applied to soils. N2O and methane are also produced from the decomposition of animal manures under low oxygen conditions.
N2 Applied is tackling this issue by converting by-products like slurry into a valuable nitrogen enriched organic liquid fertiliser. As a result of the process, the output, known as NEO, is slightly acidic, which increases its stability. This reduces the amount of ammonia released whilst eliminating methane emissions.
“Our technology can cut the carbon footprint of a dairy farm by 27% and produce a valuable organic fertiliser with three times the crop available nitrogen in slurry,” explain Chris Puttick of N2 Applied.
Nitrogen is found in different forms in the environment and total nitrogen (NH4, NO3 and NO2) needs to be considered within a nutrient management plan for the crop. This is particularly important where the farm lies within a nitrate vulnerable zone (NVZ).
Trials of NEO have shown that the nitrogen available to the crop is three times higher than untreated slurry and when applied to a grass sward increased the yield by 41% over two cuts.

Use of nitrogen is also important

Work by Professor Andrew Neal of Rothamsted Research has shown that the way nitrogen is applied to the soil is also important. Results suggest that decades of artificial fertiliser inputs on UK soil without a corresponding return of organic matter have altered the balance of carbon and nitrogen in the soil, changing the way microbes get their energy, which has in turn altered the soil structure.
In the experiment, soil with high nitrogen content but low carbon content had an altered microbial community, which was associated with less pores and connectivity in the soil. As the pores close up, and oxygen in the soil is lost, microbes are forced to turn to nitrogen and sulphur compounds for their energy. This inefficient process drains nutrients from the soil and results in increased emissions of N2O.
Andrew Neal of Rothamsted Research will be joining Guðbjörg Rist of Atmonia and Chris Puttick of N2 Applied to discuss nitrogen production and use at the Agri-TechE event “Putting the N in FarmiNg—SolutioNs for On-Farm Nitrogen ProductioN” on Wednesday 24th March from 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm.

The Future is Brighter with Vitabeam

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Vitabeam’s world-first technology is making a splash in the food sector. From farm to fork, Vitabeam technology is tackling some of the world’s biggest problems, including food waste, and producing safe, chemical-free, pathogen-free food.

When it comes to technological breakthroughs, few have the potential to impact the Food and Drink sector in a way as radical as Vitabeam.

After many years of R&D, Vitabeam produced their first LED light bar, which emits a unique combination of light wavelengths called VQe (Vitabeam Quantum energy). The wavelengths are all safe for human exposure, and have incredible properties that allow Vitabeam’s technology to positively contribute to many different global markets.

But it is within the Food and Drink sector that this tech is likely to have the biggest impact. The patented combination of light wavelengths has 2 abilities:

1) VQe interacts with plants to directly stimulate photosynthesis, increasing growth and yield, and delaying cell senescence in harvested produce to prolong freshness, and

2) VQe actively kills bacterial and mould pathogens, improving the health of plants, and minimising the microbial load on fresh food, extending its shelf-life.

Vitabeam’s technology is designed to benefit the food sector at every stage of the food supply chain, from grower, to packer, to retailer, to home consumer.
In the growing stage, the light bar, called the Vitabeam VQe MaxStrip, is a supplementary grow light. It can easily be retrofitted into any existing setup, making it an excellent option for growers looking to optimise their grow.

The MaxStrip supercharges plants by supplying them with the specific wavelengths of light, not emitted by any other grow lights, that maximise plant growth and yield. At the same time, the MaxStrip protects the plant from bacterial and mould pathogens, ensuring the plant stays healthy and the produce stays clean. This chemical-free method of pathogen killing allows growers to reduce their usage of pesticides and other chemicals, meaning they can produce clean, safe, chemical-free, residue-free food.

Once harvested, produce can be treated using Vitabeam’s high-powered sterilising technology, called the Steril Max, which combines VQe with UV. Whilst UV is often used for sterilisation purposes, the UV wavelengths cannot penetrate the surface of an object, limiting its effectiveness. VQe is able to penetrate into the food, meaning the combined usage of UV and VQe provides a more effective cleaning treatment than UV alone. This thorough cleaning treatment eliminates the need for washing produce with chemicals such as chlorine, ensuring that consumers are provided with the safest, cleanest food possible. This technology can be used for fruit, vegetables, meat, fish, and seafood to ensure they are pathogen-free, extending their shelf-life, and thereby reducing food waste.

Once food reaches the supermarket, Vitabeam’s technology can protect it, prolonging its freshness and keeping it safe and clean to keep customers healthy. MaxStrips installed in refrigerated display cabinets not only keep the produce within them clean, but also the surrounding environment. In a trial with a store in Michigan, USA, staff working in the fish department noticed the MaxStrips making a difference almost instantly. They reported that, within just a couple of days, the ‘fishy’ smell had disappeared, the fish felt firmer and looked healthier, and the ice surrounding the fish was no longer turning yellow. Furthermore, when the time came for the quarterly deep clean, there was noticeably less slime in the display case. Trials have also shown that Vitabeam’s technology can reduce wastage of fresh produce by between 25 and 30%.

Finally, when customers take their food home, VQe can be integrated into refrigerators to keep food clean and safe from pathogens. Not only does this diminish the risk of food poisoning, but it also means that food lasts longer, reducing the amount that ends up being thrown away because it has gone bad before it can be eaten. We’ve all felt the disappointment of finding that something we had been looking forward to eating has already gone mouldy. VQe can help to ensure that this feeling occurs much less often! Household food waste is therefore reduced, and less money is wasted on food that ends up in the bin!

Vitabeam is committed to helping businesses provide their customers with clean, safe, natural, chemical-free, residue-free food. Their technology has multiple benefits – keeping consumers safe and healthy, reducing food waste at every stage of the food supply chain, reducing chemical and pesticide usage, and helping everyone, from the grower to the consumer, to save money. Trials have shown that a return on investment for Vitabeam technology can be delivered quickly, for example within 6-9 months for retailers.

It is rare that a technology such as Vitabeam’s comes along which not only has the potential to benefit companies economically, but which also can help to protect the environment by reducing chemical and pesticide usage, and reducing food waste. The future really is brighter with Vitabeam.

Top innovation award for Actiphage, rapid tuberculosis test

Meet the Network
Agri-TechE

Actiphage®, a rapid, accurate test for tuberculosis that detects the presence of the live mycobacteria in a sample of blood or milk, has been awarded the Innovation Award 2021 by Veterinary Record, the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA).
Tuberculosis (TB), Bovine Tuberculosis (bTB) and Johne’s Disease continue to be devastating diseases across the globe, and there are currently few reliable diagnostic tests available. Actiphage is a simple test that can detect the diseases in livestock, humans and companion pets as well as wildlife and exotic animals.
Actiphage is developed by PBD Biotech; CEO Mark Hammond says: “Vets know first-hand the devastation caused by bTB, so this award by the BVA provides a powerful endorsement of Actiphage’s innovation. By directly detecting mycobacteria at an early stage, Actiphage provides vets with a new tool for managing and eradicating bTB and Johne’s Disease.”
The other finalists for the Vet Record Innovation Award 2021 were the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid, presented by Sarah Wolfensohn of University of Surrey, and U-treat, presented by Rachel Kirkby of Test & Trace. Both showed innovative new ways to support improved diagnosis of other animal diseases. The support of vets is invaluable to PBD Biotech as the company is planning more on-farm trials of Actiphage in the near future.
Actiphage was named as a promising test in the review of UK bovine TB strategy conducted by Professor Sir Charles Godfray. It has also been approved by the APHA for exceptional private use in areas of chronic bTB infection.
Mark continues: “Although 2020 was a challenging year for almost everyone, we have been working closely with vets and farmers to further develop the test, and in parallel have been fund-raising. Our goal is to provide the validation data necessary for Actiphage to achieve international certification by the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE).”
As Actiphage can distinguish between live and dead mycobacteria and also differentiate between wild strains and vaccine strains, it would be very effective to develop as a DIVA test – for Distinguishing Infected from Vaccinated Animals – a pre-requirement before a successful vaccination strategy can be introduced.
Actiphage has been shown to detect TB in livestock, domestic animals, wildlife and exotic species, so is of interest across the veterinary profession.
It also provides an accurate and non-invasive blood test for human TB and work is progressing to develop a clinically proven test in human TB.

Farm Performance Enhancement Platform – Farm PEP

Meet the Network
Agri-TechE

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a major impact on the ways that we communicate. ADAS has gained funding from Innovate UK to use this learning to good effect and will co-create a new digital solution called Farm Performance Enhancement Platform, or Farm-PEP. Farm-PEP will connect projects and people, integrating tools and initiatives and providing an online community space for knowledge sharing.

Farm-PEP

Daniel Kindred of ADAS comments: “We see Farm-PEP as enabling the communications between the people engaged in initiatives like the YENs.”
With partners University of Gloucester’s Countryside & Community Research Institute (CCRI), Agri-TechE , Innovative Farmers, The Farming Forum and Open Coop, the project seeks to engage key players across the industry. The intention is to evaluate the impact of Covid-19 on knowledge exchange in agriculture with a rapid appraisal, due to be published in late spring 2021 and then to create Farm-PEP to assist communications. ADAS has also gained funding to create Dynamic Benchmarking for the Yield Enhancement Network (YEN) to improve data exchange with growers. The YEN, since its foundation in 2012, has provided static pdf reports to growers on how their crops have performed within a season, compared to others in the network.
Daniel continues: “Our aim is to enable these comparisons online so that users can choose who they compare themselves to, for instance within a geographic region or for a particular soil type.
“We are aiming to make this available for YEN-Nutrition in 2021, and ultimately for YEN-Zero and all the YEN Family.”

YEN ZERO

These projects will support the development of YEN-Zero, which is supported by funding from The Morley Agricultural Foundation, and aims to quantify the greenhouse gas costs of YEN crops since 2013. This analysis will provide a baseline for comparisons and benchmarking of the different elements that make up a farm’s carbon footprint.
Daniel recently discussed the relationships between crop inputs, yields and GHG emissions at the first Agri-TechE Agritech Express webinar, which is summarised here.

Design of Farm-PEP

Agri-TechE will bring its expertise in engaging online events and digital networking to the project. Together with the other partners, it is organising a series of interactive workshops in spring 2021 to engage with the various stakeholders in the industry and co-design Farm-PEP from the ground up.
More information about Farm-PEP

See us at REAP 2021!

REAP 2021: Changing Time(s) for Agriculture10th November 2021

Imagine a world where agriculture is not constrained by time. The ability to manage and manipulate time is increasing and REAP 2021 will explore the advances in technology and breakthroughs in science that is making this possible.
REAP brings together people from across the agri-tech ecosystem who believe that innovation is the engine for change. The conference bridges the gap between producer needs and technology solutions and showcases exciting agri-tech start-ups. 

Does regulation drive or inhibit innovation?

Agri-TechE Blog
Agri-TechE

Sometimes you need to change agricultural practices to make them suitable for automation and technology, not try to invent tech that makes an incremental improvement. This was the clear message from major fresh produce suppliers who joined us recently as part of a mission from the west coast USA.
The delegation from the Western Growers Association talked to UK agri-tech innovators in robotics and decision support about the challenges they were facing from extreme weather and availability of labour and the need for harvest automation. The innovations needed to address these issues often require regulatory approval – to ensure safety of humans working alongside robots, or to stop drones conflicting with air traffic. New varieties of crop, more suitable for harvesting by machine, may also fall within legislation on genetic modification.
This started us thinking about innovation and its drivers, and the role of regulation in accelerating or hindering change.

Does regulation drive or inhibit innovation?

One of the main levers of Government (along with taxes, funding and incentives) is the legal landscape. Regulations around a sector or technology can make or break its potential commercial impact and Lexington Communications will be providing some thought provoking input on this subject at the next Agri-TechE xpress event.
With the UK’s departure from the EU, two key pieces of legislation are under consideration with significant potential impact on the sector: Gene-editing consultation
The Oxford Farming Conference saw the announcement of a consultation around gene-editing, as announced by George Eustice, Defra’s Secretary of State. Since 2018, gene-editing has been considered by the European Court of Justice to be “genetic modification” and hence subject to the same regulation about development and release of material engineered in this way.
For some, this regulation has been seen as inappropriate, given that gene-editing is a different process and consider that it should therefore be regulated in a different way. The start of 2021 saw the conversation begin to change around the UK’s position on how gene-edited organisms are regulated. For many, this is the start of a long-awaited shift with the potential to provide an uplift in productivity and reduction in use of ag-chem. A new approach to regulation may also open the way to making the UK a more attractive market to develop and innovate.
Different methods of growing plants may well require different traits, for example in vertical farming the plants gain nutrients through sprays, mists and deep water hydroponics, what implications will this have on production? Controlled Environment Agriculture is changing the way we traditionally think about growing crops and advanced breeding techniques will have an important role to play in this sector. National Security and Investment Bill
This is a major piece of legislation which impacts agriculture – and indeed many other sectors. The National Security and Investment Bill aims to have stricter screening of overseas investment into the UK. The aim of this Bill is to ensure overseas companies don’t undermine or usurp UK business interests and reduce their competitiveness on a global stage.
This Bill also has implications across the board for innovation, given that R&D is often a global, collaborative endeavour, and that international insights and technologies advance the body of knowledge and accelerate products to market.
There is a potential risk that the UK will be seen as a less attractive market in which to partner with innovators and do R&D. The implications for developments in Artificial Intelligence and robotics, in particular, are causing concern.

Balancing innovation and regulation 

Rarely do innovation and regulation keep pace with each other – often innovators and even end-users are frustrated at the apparent lack of pace of lawmakers to ensure appropriately robust, but suitably enabling requirements.
But similarly, law-makers need those in the innovation community to provide them with high quality insights, information and data to help the legislation stay abreast of the fast-moving pace of technology development. Also to consider the wider ethical and social consequences of new technologies.
Legislation around technology is likely to be moving fast over the coming months and years. By engaging with policy-makers, providing open and transparent information and ensuring there is good awareness of the potential implications, we can all help ensure the UK continues to build its reputation as one of the world’s leading places for innovation.

REAP 2020 report launched

Agri-TechE Article
Agri-TechE

A new era of decision support tools is making it possible to understand the complexity of food production for the first time and to begin to see how the system can be improved at every level to provide both incremental improvements and disruptive change.
The REAP 2020 conference brought together innovative thinkers from different disciplines to look at agricultural production from the perspective of a system that is an integral part of the natural environment.
The online event attracted a global audience and this report aims to provide a flavour of the discussions and to capture some of the excitement of the Agri-TechE innovation ecosystem.
Speakers discussed emerging agri-tech, the learning points gained from technologies already deployed on-farm, and the innovations that by providing decision support for managing risk are moving us closer towards a future that is productive, profitable and sustainable.
To capture the virtual nature of REAP 2020 we have produced an interactive report including video excerpts from many of the presentations (in the form of a Powerpoint Show), as well as a traditional pdf document.

Airponix Solution nutrient spray reduces water requirements in Kenyan trial

Meet the Network
Agri-TechE

airponix
A nutrient spray is being used by Airponix to deliver a growing system that makes agricultural sustainable in extreme conditions. 
Michael Ruggier is speaking at “CEA is Growing Up” he is the CEO of Airponix which has a smart, sustainable and soilless system that is designed to support the growth of a broad range of food and niche crops.
He explains: “Our solution mimics nature, like an orchid growing in air, absorbing light, oxygen, humidity and nutrients from its surroundings. Roots are exposed to a nutrient rich fog which is more effective way of delivering the nutrients than any other systems such as current aeroponics which sprays the roots, or hydroponics which submerges them.
“It does not require an expensive pumping system or for the water to be changed, so in comparison to hydroponics we use a fraction of the water and can provide double the yield.”
 ”It is a simple, low-maintenance, smart, soil-less system.” 
  Airponix is currently trialing the technology in Kenya to provide seed potatoes, and has an agreement with major potato house in the UK. 

Try before buying

Airponix nutrient spray
Airponix is trialing its technology in Kenya

The plan is to lease small units to potential customers for a season so they can test the technology before making a commitment.
Michael explains:  Adopting a new technology is hard enough, especially if it is a new radical change. We are going allow customers to try-before-buying with some clearly defined key performance indicators. When they see how good it is, they’re going to want as many as they can get! 
“This is already underway but currently looking for partners in geographies where there is low food-security but high-income, for example the Middle East) as they will be more comfortable trialing new technology. Once the technology has been proven multiple times we will expand further.” 

Nutrient spray offers benefits over other technologies

Michael explains that the system has benefits when compared to hydroponics and aeroponics.  
Hydroponics uses a lot of water and pumps, and so requires lots of energy  to pump the water. Airponix uses a much more fundamental force, entropy, to deliver the nutrients. 
“Aeroponics also uses a spray but this results in the roots becoming long, drooping, and stuck together. Airponix’s much smaller droplet size allows for the roots to grow out in a much more efficient way making it much easier for the plant to absorb the nutrients as it penetrates deep into all the root hairs. 
 ”In addition, we are developing a new technology (IP secured) that will drastically reduce the running and maintenance cost of the system to keep us ahead of the competition.” 
More about Airponix