Sky’s the limit: Why Agri-TechE Should Engage with Drone Law Reform

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Sky’s the limit: Why Agri-TechE Should Engage with Drone Law Reform

Drones and autonomous flight technologies are set to revolutionise how we travel, deliver goods and produce food, and the government has taken note. As part of a comprehensive three-year review into the regulatory framework of autonomous flight and the use of drones, the Law Commission has launched a second consultation. Its three-year review is nearing completion with recommendations expected to be published by early 2026 and will shape how this fast-moving sector evolves. For innovators in agri-tech and beyond, the opportunity to help design the rules that will govern a sky filled with commercial drones is now.

Flying free from EU constraints

Legislative agility to facilitate innovation is the ambition and ties into the government’s wider economic growth agenda. Aviation law in the UK is prescriptive and duly geared towards the passenger aviation sector. With the UK no longer bound by EU aviation rules, policymakers can now craft a more bespoke, agile regulatory environment that encourages experimentation, accelerates innovation and attracts investment.

However, the government has identified a possible post-Brexit dividend as the current regulatory regime is largely a carryover from current EU law. This presents a unique opportunity to break away from legacy constraints and design a tailored regime for UK-specific innovations and ambitions. A more flexible regime could fast-track the safe deployment of cutting-edge drone technology and give UK-based companies a first-mover advantage, enabling them to export innovations globally.

Drones on farms: Unlocking agri-tech potential

Commercial applications of drone technology are wide ranging. For the food and agriculture sectors alone, drones could revolutionise farming operations:

  • Precision agriculture from monitoring crops based on thermal sensors to scanning fields and accurately predicting crop yields.
  • Agricultural sprays deploying pesticides, fertilizers and herbicides thereby reducing labour costs, use of chemicals and their environmental impacts, and identifying diseases or pests to prevent wider outbreaks.
  • Irrigation management by identifying drainage issues to drought stressed areas and enabling the more efficient use of water and real-time crop water requirements.
  • Crop insurance and assessment by providing accurate, unbiased and detailed imagery required by insurers to speed up claims processes.
  • Harvesting assistance by providing crop maturity assessments to more effectively plan harvesting schedules and boosting the quality of crop yields.
  • Forestry and orchard management by measuring canopy growth, quantifying tree populations and aiding pruning schedules.

The economic case for drone-powered agriculture

There are many economic benefits – from reduced labour and input costs through more precise allocation of resources, to increasing crop yields via data driven decision making. Lower chemical and water usage not only cuts costs but also supports environmental sustainability. For businesses able to make the capital investment, drone technology is set to become a core component of modern agricultural management, policymakers should be engaged on this.

Government support signals lift-off

There is clear momentum in government to embrace drone technologies. The aviation minister has confirmed £20 million in funding for new flight technologies, including £5m earmarked for the Future of Flight Challenge. These initiatives could create government-backed testbeds for agri-tech solutions and help de-risk businesses ready for investment. For innovators in the sector, this is a moment to engage directly with policymakers, to shape the regulatory framework and unlock the commercial potential of drone led farming. The Law Commission’s second consultation is open until 18 July 2025, and alongside a wider engagement programme, this is a key opportunity to have your voice heard and set the direction of travel for the sector.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Future of Fertiliser Report Launched

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

A large group of global agriculture and food chain experts have called for greater collaboration across the fertiliser industry to ensure future food security for a growing global population while reducing agriculture’s impact on soils and the wider environment.

The “Future of Fertiliser” report, commissioned by Anglo American and compiled by Deloitte, interviewed 74 industry experts from around the world to better understand what needs to change to ensure we can feed the world responsibly in 2050.

The report comes ahead of the annual conference of the International Fertiliser Association (IFA) whose CEO, Alzbeta Klein, was asked what she believed the focus of the annual conference would be in 25 years’ time. She said: “2050 will be more than just a meeting about fertilisers. It will be a global summit on the future of humanity’s relationship with food, nature and technology.”

Tom McCulley, CEO of Anglo American’s Crop Nutrients business, said: “There is no doubt in our minds that the future of agriculture has to be different if we are to produce more, better quality food more sustainably than we do today.

“The field of agriculture experts interviewed for this report – drawn from farmers to policymakers and major food-producing companies – agree with that reality. Together, they overwhelmingly concluded that we need to stop thinking about crop yields in isolation and instead focus on the long-term impact of many widely used fertilisers on our soils, the emissions from fertiliser production and use, and the nutritional value of the food we eat to ensure future generations have the legacy they deserve.”

Key insights from the report include that fertilisers, and the nutrients they provide, will continue to underpin agricultural success but their application must become more sustainable to preserve precious natural resources for the long term.

Specifically, the agricultural industry must stand up to redefine the metrics for success in the agricultural sector and better manage the often-competing balance of yield, soil health and responsible farming practices. Scalable crop nutrition solutions that efficiently use available nutrients across a broad range of crops to maximise return on investment must be a priority in this evolution – an important step away from historical wasteful practices, damaged soil and unnecessary emissions.

The report states that by embracing these shifts and seizing the opportunities they present, the sector can ensure that future fertiliser practices not only meet the growing demand for food but also contribute positively to the planet and future generations that will demand more and better-quality food.

Duncan Wanblad, Chief Executive of Anglo American, introduced the report by commenting: “The future of fertilisers must be one where crop solutions both nourish people and sustain the planet, building on the incredible successes of food production since the mid-20th century. Greater use of sustainable fertilisers has a vital role in increasing crop yield and resilience in parallel with protecting nature and improving soil health.”

The report also concluded that solutions and incentives needed to be tailored to the real day-to-day needs of farmers and that greater levels of trust and adoption of innovation are needed across the industry.

Those interviewed agreed that by 2050, regulation and financial incentives will have driven a transition in responsible agricultural practices, that will increasingly prioritise the importance of soil health. Achieving these changes will require the fertiliser industry itself to collaborate, focus on issues beyond yield, work more closely with farmers and internalise the environmental costs of fertiliser across the food value chain.

The report was commissioned by Anglo American and compiled by Deloitte through interviews with 74 industry experts. The full report can be downloaded here: http://uk.angloamerican.com/futureoffertiliser

Product Development: more than a game of chance

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

In a recent conversation with a prospective client, we were discussing their potential route to market by figuratively walking them through our development programme illustration

Their first comment was that it was less linear and formulaic than they assumed it would be and actually looked more like a snakes and ladders board.

Well, this got me thinking. Is this a good analogy of the product development process? Do you have to be careful of landing on a particular ‘square’ in your development in case it sends you right back to the start?

eg technology development programme

The simple answer is no, but there are, however, plenty of hurdles throughout and although a particular action won’t catapult you back to the start, key omissions in your programme will.

Is product development a game of chance?

“Snakes and ladders is a game of chance. Product development is not. Actions wont send you backwards, but omissions will.”

The best way to win a game of snakes and ladders is to get to the end square using the quickest possible route. A nice lofty ladder from the start to the end point is a good way to succeed, but getting there is somewhat beyond your control. Every roll of the dice dictates your route and it’s down to chance whether you climb straight to that winning square or go the long way round. The game of product development is less serendipitous.

As a product development consultancy, we often see people who have an incredible innovation but are so eager to get it on the market that they are hell-bent on taking that ladder straight to launch. However, this approach inevitably omits key programme requirements, landing them in a position that will likely snake them back to the start, to address the factors they have missed.

It is no surprise that many innovators try to rush through steps. Product development is no quick process, especially when it comes to medical devices (which can take between three to five years to develop). And without a defined development roadmap, which is only really achieved through frontline experience, it is understandable that many innovators look to partner with a development specialist.

At eg, we have spent years refining our development pathway and have learned along the way, which steps must be factored in and, more importantly, when. Nothing we do is down to chance. Everything is planned, scheduled, reported upon and managed carefully by our team of project managers. This may not be the preferred option for many, some may want to go it alone, but rolling a dice with product development won’t get you very far, as you will only have to return and address the elements you missed. Plan every step of your route to market and leave no stone unturned to avoid any potential snakes.

Failing fast

One of the single most frustrating things when playing snakes and ladders is making your way carefully (some might say luckily) towards the top of the board, only to land on a gargantuan python which takes you back to the start. I have played many games, where I have smugly mocked my daughter as I ploughed ahead and she hit snake after snake, only to see her whizzing past me to the finish line, whilst I take the long descent back to square one!

The moral of that touching story?
1. Play nice…nobody likes a smug opponent.
2. It’s often better to face multiple smaller pitfalls early on in your journey, than one enormous downward spiral towards the end, when you’ve already expended much of your enthusiasm and energy and have much further to climb. And guess what? The same applies when developing a product.

We often use the phrase, ‘failing fast’. This might seem like a slightly negative approach; but if you have an idea for an amazing innovation and are in the process of generating concepts, you want to know what will, and more importantly what will not work pretty quickly. Dedicating time and resource to a doomed concept doesn’t do anyone any favours, so we, as a team dedicate time to analysing the approaches, including those that won’t work, so they can be taken out of the equation quickly. We then cycle through prototyping stages to iron out further faults and ensure our progression is measured and tested.

Failing fast effectively means ruling out improbable options early on in the process, and this approach forces you as a developer to prioritise risk management in your programme. Looking at a product through ‘risk-coloured glasses’ allows for pragmatic development and careful progress via a considered pathway.

Iteration is not a backward step

Looking at the development roadmap that spurned the snakes and ladders comparison, it is clear that the numerous arrows which link stages are the source of comparison. But what do these arrows indicate? When we think of product development, we think of the key stages; concept generation, design and development, transfer to manufacture and market launch.

Four very linear stage gates. However, there are multiple tasks, requirements and actions that make up these broader stages and effective development often requires each to be visited multiple times.

As mentioned, front-loading your programme with human factors and usabilityrisk management and market research will arm you with the information you need for a successful development, but until you start prototyping and testing your theories, in reality you don’t know for sure it will perform exactly as you wish. This is a major similarity to the fortuitous game of snakes and ladders; a snake might take you backwards, but that doesn’t mean to say you won’t have a better journey going forward (just ask my daughter!).

We must stop looking at iteration as a backwards step and realise progress isn’t always a straight line. By iterating and cycling through stages, we end up with a more rigorously tested, robust and potentially successful product than if we’d have blindly ploughed on, because let’s face it, we’d have only got so far without encountering a snake!

Don’t roll the dice with your product development

So, going back to the original question…is the game of snakes and ladders a good analogy for the product development process? I think the answer is, in some ways, yes – purely due to the repetitive (or iterative) nature of the game, but in other ways, absolutely not.

Firstly, your route to market shouldn’t be guided by luck, it should in fact be rigorously planned to include all eventualities. There should be no surprises along the way, if it is planned correctly. Rushing your idea and not having complete insight into all aspects of your route to market leaves elements to chance and this is a recipe for disaster.

Secondly, it is important to remember that iteration often leads to a better end product and isn’t an unnecessary inconvenience – it may prolong the prototyping stage, but it will save you time and money in the long run. Test, test and test again and incorporate your learnings to ensure your product is compliant, effective and a success.

Don’t leave your product’s future up to chance by rolling the dice with your development, reach out and we can help you climb every ladder to success (see what I did there?!).

For more information or to chat with one of our team about your product design and development requirements, please do not hesitate to get in touch:

Via email on design@egtechnology.co.uk, by giving us a call on +44 01223 813184, or by clicking here.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Spending Review in Focus: Winners, Losers and Implications for Business

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

GK Strategy would like to invite you to: Spending Review in Focus: Winners, Losers and Implications for Business

Keynote speakers: The Rt Hon David Laws – Former Chief Secretary to the Treasury and Minister of State for Schools &  Chris Giles – Economics Commentator, Financial Times

When: Thursday 12 June from 09:30 to 10:30

Where: This event will be held on Zoom

RSVP: Please RSVP by emailing events@gkstrategy.com for joining details.

Details: GK Strategy is delighted to be hosting former Treasury minister David Laws and Economics Commentator at the Financial Times Chris Giles to discuss the publication of the government’s spending review and its impact on businesses. The spending review will set departmental spending for the rest of the parliament and promises to be a pivotal moment in Labour’s time in office, especially given the spending pressures across the public sector and the government’s desire to drive economic growth.


The Rt Hon David Laws is a strategic adviser to GK with a wealth of experience across the policy and politics of education and skills.

Between 2001 and 2015, David served as the Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament for Yeovil. He held various senior frontbench positions for the party in parliament, including as its spokesperson on schools, children and families, before joining the Cabinet as Chief Secretary to the Treasury in the Coalition Government. From 2012 to 2015, David was the Minister of State for Schools in the Department for Education.

He has served as Executive Chairman of the Education Policy Institute and the Education Partnerships Group. In December 2022, David was appointed chair of Energy UK, a post he started in early 2023.

Chris Giles is the FT’s economics commentator. He writes a fortnightly column and the weekly newsletter, Chris Giles on Central Banks. Previously, he was economics editor and served as a leader writer.

He is an Honorary Professor of Practice at the UCL Policy Lab. Before joining the FT, he worked for the BBC, Ofcom and the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Chris loves numbers.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Ceres Research Launches Farmer Membership Service

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Ceres Research has launched a new membership service for arable farmers who want to benefit from the latest independent and technical advice.

Developed to deliver timely, data-driven solutions for progressive farmers and related businesses, the new service will combine regular agronomic, economic and political insights with field-based reviews and events.

That makes it suitable for those who are interested in the science behind the advice that they are offered and want to stay ahead.

Farmers who become members will receive:

  • Relevant and timely publications on key topics.
  • Monthly Digests bringing the latest updates on agricultural policy and regulation, industry news, science and innovation, and relevant publications for useful insights.
  • Online Agronomy Club meetings designed to help aid your decisions and plan for upcoming agronomy, powered by the latest scientific data.
  • Skills webinars and training events offering you valuable insights and practical training to support your professional growth.
  • Monthly podcast episodes, giving you easy audio access to essential topics from budgeting, benchmarking, agronomy, farm trial design, health and safety, business strategy, policy, and grants.
  • Innovative digital tools in the form of interactive dashboards that allow farmers to investigate and benchmark their key metrics as well as stay up to date with weather trends.

The cost of membership is £700/year, with existing Ceres Rural agronomy clients qualifying for a 25% discount. A free trial of your first online Agronomy Club meeting is being offered to anyone interested in the new service. Contact Danni at: dannielle.roche@ceresresearch.com if you would like to attend or have any queries.

To find out more, please visit Agricultural Experts, Researchers & Advisors | Ceres Research

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

Funding for Norfolk-based farms and businesses

Funding Finder
Norfolk & Suffolk County Councils

For businesses and farmers in the Norfolk area there are a number of grants and funding programmes available – including nutrient mitigation and innovation grant mentoring.

Crowdfund Norfolk: Supporting environmental, sustainability and net zero projects in Norfolk

Norfolk County Council have teamed up with Crowdfunder to launch Crowdfund Norfolk. Using the power of the crowd, we’re helping environmental, sustainability and net zero projects to get the funding they need to turn their ideas into a reality. Projects that match the eligibility criteria will be eligible for 50% funding, up to the maximum value of £10,000.

The types of projects we would expect to see could include but not exhaustive to:

  • Local wildlife training and monitoring schemes
  • Nature – works to improve habitats or conserve species, as well as helping people to connect to nature in their daily lives
  • Designed landscapes – improving and conserving historic landscapes such as public parks, historic gardens and botanical gardens
  • Improving landscapes for people and nature by, for example, restoring habitats and celebrating the cultural traditions of the land
  • Replacing community infrastructure structure fossil fuel reliance – for example air or ground source heat pump upgrades to oil heating systems
  • Innovative carbon reduction aspects of new build community buildings like cobbauge, strawbuild or insulation techniques

There is currently no closing date for this fund, full information is available on Crowdfunder.

Norfolk Water Strategy Programme

This round of funding supports early-stage studies that lay the groundwork for impactful, well-informed Nature-based Solution (NbS) projects—helping to create deliverable solutions for Norfolk’s water challenges.

The Norfolk Water Fund (NWF) is a financial mechanism established under the Norfolk Water Strategy Programme (NWSP) to support the development, and delivery, of NbS projects that address water challenges in the region (specifically, at present, the catchments of Ant, Bure, Wensum and Yare).

With thanks to TNC’s Go Fund, NWF is currently accepting applications from those seeking funding to carry out a feasibility study to help design an effective NbS project or to monitor its impact.

A successful feasibility study will provide the data and insights needed to maximise the project’s impact on water security (e.g., geophysical and ground investigation surveys) while considering practical constraints (e.g., ecology and archaeology surveys). It could also assess the financial viability of the project to access environmental markets.

In addition, funding is available for monitoring activities, including staff time, equipment, and resources needed to track the effectiveness of NbS interventions over time. To design a robust monitoring plan, please see our recently developed best practise guidance on NbS 

To apply for funding of up to £15,000, please email nwsp@wre.org.uk to receive the application template. 

Norfolk Nutrient Mitigation Fund

The Norfolk Nutrient Mitigation Fund offers grants and repayable loans to reduce phosphorus and nitrogen levels in the Wensum, Bure, and Yare catchments. This supports much-needed housing and helps restore river conditions through nutrient neutrality.

Where can the fund help?

Feasibility Support: If you have an idea but need scientific advice or funding to explore it further, a grant could help.
Loan Funding: If you have a project ready to go but need funding to make it a reality, a loan could be the solution.

What projects qualify?

Here are some examples:

  • Crop changes: Planting low-fertiliser crops or those that absorb nutrients.
  • Fertiliser reduction: Applying less or switching to alternatives.
  • Riparian buffers: Installing or expanding natural buffers near waterways.
  • Livestock changes: Reducing or ceasing livestock levels.
  • Septic tank upgrades: Modernising or combining multiple systems.
  • Nature-based solutions: Creating wetlands or similar ecosystems.
  • Business adaptations: Installing new equipment or changing operations.

There is currently no closing date for this fund. You can see full eligibility information and how to apply on the NMF Norfolk website.

Norfolk and Suffolk: Innovation grant mentoring project

Do you have an idea worthy of Innovate UK funding, or need help with your application? Get mentoring and bid writing support to help you secure the funding you need to develop your project or idea from Norfolk and Suffolk County Councils.

Innovation funding can help you take your business to the next level, whether you’re looking to develop a new product or expand into a new market.

But getting the funding can be a complicated process and take a lot of time, especially if you have a smaller business. The programme is here to help you submit a strong application and increase your chances of getting funding.

If you’ve applied for Innovate UK funding before but didn’t get it, apply today and they can help you in your next bid. They can also help support you work on an early concept idea.

Businesses must be based in Norfolk or Suffolk.

How it works

Explore your business aims and ambitions so you can be matched with mentors or bid writing coaches. They will help you to develop your ideas and reach the stage where you’re ready to apply for innovation funding.

The project helps a variety of business types, from sole traders to micro, small and medium businesses. If you have an idea that could be worthy of innovation funding, the programme can help you!

The mentors and bid writing coaches can help identify appropriate grants for you. Then, coach your business in the art of bid writing, helping you develop your funding application.

Alongside mentors and coaches, there are expert project partners on hand to give you specialist sector advice or academic expertise for your project.

Your business ideas will be treated in strict confidence. Applicants, mentors and coaches all sign non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) at the start of the project.

For more information and to apply, please visit the Norfolk County Council website.

 

You can see more open funding calls in our Funding Finder; these are open to other specific regions and UK wide.

Scientists look to biotechnology to improve crop resilience and nutritional value

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

A new project – funded by a £8.5M grant from the UK Government’s Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) – will leverage advances in engineering biology to establish synthetic plant chromosome (synPAC) technologies.

Delivered by a collaboration from the Earlham Institute, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, at the University of Manchester, and the John Innes Centre, the project will first focus on potatoes, a staple crop for millions of people.

Researchers will leverage advances in engineering biology to establish synthetic plant chromosome (synPAC) technologies. These technologies promise to provide powerful new ways of introducing novel traits to plants —such as producing essential nutrients or increased pest resistance—while maintaining the plant’s existing characteristics.

Modern agriculture faces significant challenges, from climate change to soil degradation and food security concerns. However, traditional plant breeding and selection can take decades to introduce beneficial traits, relying on random genetic mixing over multiple generations.

Professor Anthony Hall, Project Co-Lead and Head of Plant Genomics at the Earlham Institute, said: “Climate instability, changes in land use, and global conflicts are creating increasing demands on our farmland. This requires us to rethink how we develop new crops to feed our growing populations, replace fossil fuels, and provide new platforms for biomanufacturing.

“These technologies have the power to remove breeding bottlenecks that have stymied development of new and improved crops. We want to establish a robust, flexible, and reproducible engineering ecosystem to allow the targeted programming of plants at a scale that can transform food security and open up new areas of biomanufacturing.”

This project will develop synPACs, a novel system for rapidly designing and delivering beneficial traits to plants. Building on natural processes, synPACs enable researchers to rapidly introduce multi-gene traits in a far more precise, controllable, and predictable fashion — offering an innovative alternative to conventional breeding methods.

To achieve this, scientists at the University of Manchester will develop unique new technologies that will allow crop scientists to design and build chromosomes carrying desired traits. synPACs will use Saccharomyces cerevisiae (common baker’s yeast) as a DNA assembly line to efficiently assemble large segments of plant DNA into synthetic chromosomes. These will be directly transferred to crop plants using highly efficient methods developed at the John Innes Centre and characterised at the Earlham Institute.

Dr Joshua James, Research Fellow at the Manchester Institute of Biotechnology said: “This project will address these challenges by increasing plant resilience to climate change and pests, therefore reducing the need for harmful agrochemicals such as pesticides, and supporting more sustainable farming which is better for the health of both people and the planet.

“We hope that our work will support global ambitions of finding a sustainable way to secure our food supply chains.”

The Earlham Institute will lead on three key areas of the project. Professor Anthony Hall will oversee the development of a potato tissue atlas and regulatory element discovery. The assembly and testing of a potato regulatory element library will be led by Dr Carolina Grandellis through the Earlham Biofoundry. While Dr Conrad Nieduszynski’s team leads on engineering and maintenance of synPAC components.

The first phase of the project will focus on potatoes, a globally important crop, with the goal of developing technology pipelines to fast-track plant engineering. Initial target traits will include enhanced nutritional content and resilience against environmental stressors, as well as improving agricultural sustainability by reducing reliance on chemical inputs while improving crop yields. By enabling plants to efficiently produce valuable compounds, synPACs could also support the development of new, plant-based sources of essential nutrients and bioactive compounds, benefiting both human health and the environment.

Professor Anne Osbourn FRS, Group Leader and Deputy Director of the John Innes Centre said: “This vital funding means we can begin to programme and engineer plants at scale, creating and testing custom-built plant chromosomes to help crop resilience against disease and climate change, and to make crops more nutritious.

“At the John Innes Centre we will be testing bespoke techniques and refining each stage of the synthetic chromosome creation process in potatoes, ensuring safety and effectiveness, with a view to trialling different plants too.

“This innovation has the potential to transform plant science, breeding and agriculture, allowing fast and large-scale improvements at a genetic level, to support farmers and food security in the UK and worldwide.”

The synPAC initiative is committed to working transparently with industry partners, regulators, and the public to ensure responsible development and application of this technology. The research team is focused on delivering benefits for both farmers and consumers, ensuring that crops developed through this platform align with the highest standards of safety, sustainability, and societal acceptance. The synPAC team will work closely with social science teams also funded by ARIA to explore these critical issues.

Professor Patrick Cai, Chair in Synthetic Genomics at the University of Manchester, said: “We are proud to be directly addressing a huge planetary challenge through our research. Feeding our growing population is becoming increasingly difficult as land is taken away from agriculture, soil quality is degrading, and climate change is affecting crop growth and yield.”

With a clear roadmap for Phase Two, the synPAC team aims to expand this technology to other staple crops, ultimately ushering in a new age of crops optimised for climate resilience, nutrition, and sustainability.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

How an Act of Parliament has transformed the future of banana technology in Norwich

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.
Image Credit: Tropic Biosciences

Earlier this month, the House of Lords passed the Precision Breeding Act which has opened up a new world of opportunity for researchers and food biotech companies at Norwich Research Park.

The Act allows for the gene editing of plants and crops in England, something Tropic, a food biotech company that has been based at Norwich Research Park for several years, is pioneering with crops grown in tropical regions of the world such as bananas and rice as well as closer to home with sugar beet.

Gene editing enables precise, targeted changes to plant DNA to make improved varieties that are resistant to disease, last longer or improve yields. Although the technology is highly advanced, it simply replicates the natural process that occurs in traditional plant breeding and accelerates the results which would otherwise take decades to achieve.

Tropic recently announced that it has developed a variety of the world’s most consumed Cavendish banana whose flesh will remain yellow and firm, whilst retaining its taste, for up to 48 hours after it is peeled and sliced. It will also stay fresh for longer.

The impacts of this breakthrough are immense. Adopting this new variety of the Cavendish banana will cut down food waste, make growing and distributing bananas more cost efficient, help to preserve the banana industry and open up new markets for bananas to be used in.

It is estimated that 1.4m bananas are thrown away daily, in the UK alone, because their skin blackens and the flesh browns quickly once peeled. A large proportion – up to 50% –  of these bananas are thrown away before they even reach supermarkets’ shelves. That’s because they have to be shipped from growing regions in the tropics such as South America. They are harvested when they are green and kept refrigerated during transportation before being ripened when they reach their destinations – such as the UK. Many get damaged en route, and a single damaged banana can cause the whole container to go brown and are unusable by the time they arrive. And when they are ripened and hit the shops, bananas only last a few days.

Because the new variety will remain fresh and firm after peeling, it means that not only will you be able to return to a peeled banana in your home, but you’ll also start to find them in fruit salads, snackpots, milkshakes and smoothies sold in shops, cafes and restaurants. The team at Tropic have also found that this new banana is not affected by being kept alongside other fruits, specifically kiwi and melon.

Andrew Dominy, VP Product Management at Tropic, said, “Bananas are the most popular fruit in the world, billions are grown and eaten each year. Bananas are highly nutritious, a great source of vitamins, minerals and energy, and of course – they are delicious! However bananas are sterile, and don’t produce seeds which means they can’t be cross-bred to produce new varieties, like you would see with apples for instance, and so any changes need to be made by editing its DNA. This is a perfectly safe but highly complex process that has taken years for us to develop, and now that the Precision Breeding Act has been approved in England it will open up great opportunities for bringing these improved products to consumers here.

“Precision bred products are already available in the US, Canada, Japan and many other countries so we have already started work to get these new bananas on the shelves there and now expect them to be available next year to consumers in England. The global banana industry is massive but we need to make it more efficient by reducing waste, extending crop life and helping to create more disease-resistant varieties. We’re developing improved varieties with benefits to growers and consumers, better for people and for the planet.”

Tropic, which employs more than 150 people at its headquarters at Norwich Research Park, isn’t stopping with its non-browning banana. It is also working on an extended shelf-life variety that will increase the crop’s ‘green-life’. That means these bananas will be able to be harvested later, will grow bigger, will bruise less and will be able to be shipped over a longer time period. It will lower emissions and bring benefits to growers such as those in Ecuador who will then be able to ship their harvests further distances.

Tropic is also developing disease-resistant varieties. Bananas are susceptible to two potentially devastating fungal diseases – Panama and Black Sigatoka – which are very harmful to the soil in which bananas are grown and that is very difficult to recover from. The naturally resistant varieties Tropic are developing will help to reduce the amount of pesticides required to keep crops healthy, as well as ensuring secure and stable supplies of the world’s most consumed fruit.

It is also undertaking collaborations on improving disease-resistance and improving crop yields with rice and is working on a project with British Sugar, the John Innes Centre (JIC) and the British Beet Research Organisation (BBRO) (JIC and BBRO also based at Norwich Research Park) to develop a way to help one of Norfolk’s most important crops, sugar beet, become resistant to the disease Virus Yellows that can devastate a crop.

Roz Bird, CEO of Anglia Innovation Partnership, the campus management organisation at Norwich Research Park, said, “It’s tremendous news that the Precision Breeding Act has been passed enabling companies like Tropic and researchers at the John Innes Centre to positively impact crops and plants for the benefit of the global society. It is really exciting that the way is now clear for Tropic to bring its first product to market and that those of us in England will be able to directly benefit when they become available to buy here next year.

“We are really proud to have some of the world’s leading minds, in precision breeding and plant genetics, on our campus. We want to make sure that this work continues to attract interest from scientists, researchers, and entrepreneurs internationally. We are looking for new collaborations with other research communities and large corporates, and to we are looking attract start-ups, and their investors, to join our campus and benefit from our leading expertise. I am sure we will receive lots of enquiries as Tropic’s new banana varieties enter the market and attracts attention.”

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

De Sangosse Champions Education and Stewardship to Help Farmers ‘Grow Smarter’ at Cereals 2025

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Stand 712b: Nurturing Growth, Harvesting Excellence

De Sangosse, a leading provider of crop protection solutions and agricultural inputs, is preparing to showcase its latest innovations and stewardship initiatives at the Cereals Event 2025, taking place on June 11-12 in Lincolnshire.

For farmers, agronomists, and sprayer operators seeking expert advice and cutting-edge solutions, De Sangosse invites attendees to visit stand 712b. With a focus on practical learning, live demonstrations, and one-on-one technical advice, De Sangosse is set to reinforce its commitment to helping UK farmers grow smarter.

A Hub for Agronomic Education

As part of this year’s BASIS Knowledge Trail, De Sangosse’s stand will serve as a hands-on learning hub. The company’s approach combines innovation with education, offering visitors the tools and insights needed to make informed agronomic decisions. Whether addressing issues like glyphosate stewardship, crop nutrition, soil health, or slug control, De Sangosse’s stand will provide invaluable support to tackle the challenges that UK arable businesses are facing today.

Rhodri Morris, Commercial Director at De Sangosse, sums up the theme for this year’s event: “‘Nurturing Growth, Harvesting Excellence.’ This reflects not only the innovative technologies we bring to the table but also the forward-thinking mindset that modern farming demands.”

Glyphosate Stewardship: A Critical Focus

With glyphosate-resistant ryegrass now confirmed on UK farms, De Sangosse is emphasising the importance of glyphosate stewardship at the event. As the risk of resistance continues to grow, effective stewardship is essential to ensure the long-term viability of this vital herbicide. De Sangosse’s Glyphosate Stewardship Zone will be a focal point for educating farmers on best practices for resistance management, water quality, and application techniques.

“Glyphosate resistance is a real and growing risk, so every application counts,” explains Rhodri Morris. “Water quality plays a huge role in ensuring glyphosate works effectively. Too often, hard water ties up the herbicide, reducing its efficacy.”

Visitors to De Sangosse’s stand will gain access to practical resources, including:

  • Free digital water testing meters to help farmers assess their own spray water quality
  • A new Glyphosate Stewardship Guide packed with best practice advice and resistance management strategies

By highlighting the role of water quality and resistance awareness, De Sangosse hopes to equip farmers with the knowledge needed to make glyphosate applications more effective and sustainable.

 

Soil Nutrient Activators: Unlocking the Potential in Your Soil

A detailed image showcasing a plant’s root system beneath the soil and grass. The intricate network of roots is beautifully displayed.

In addition to glyphosate stewardship, De Sangosse will highlight its innovative soil nutrient activators—a game-changer for farmers aiming to enhance soil fertility without increasing the use of chemical fertilisers. These activators are designed to unlock bound phosphate and essential micronutrients that are already present in the soil, making them more accessible for crops during key growth stages.

“With fertiliser prices still volatile, being able to mobilise what’s already in the soil is a huge advantage for growers,” says Mr. Morris. “This not only supports sustainability but also strengthens financial resilience by reducing reliance on external inputs.”

On-site experts will guide visitors through how these soil activators can be integrated into both autumn and spring farming programs to maximise nutrient uptake and boost crop productivity.

Smarter Crop Nutrition: Foliar Feeding for Healthier Crops

Closeup of corn seedling and weed in field, selective focus

De Sangosse is also placing a strong emphasis on smarter crop nutrition at the Cereals Event. Their foliar feeding solutions are designed to help crops unlock their full potential by preventing nutrient deficiencies that can compromise growth and yield. With a focus on efficient and sustainable feeding practices, the company’s biostimulant range promises to enhance plant health and crop resilience.

“It’s not just about feeding crops; it’s about feeding them efficiently,” explains Mr. Morris. “Our solutions are tailored to help plants navigate stress, safen herbicide tank-mixes, and ultimately maximise yield.”

Farmers visiting the stand will have the opportunity to explore how foliar nutrition can improve plant health, reduce the impact of environmental stressors, and enhance overall crop productivity.

Pod Sealants: Protecting Yield at the Final Stage

The event will also spotlight pod sealants, a proven solution to safeguard yields, particularly in oilseed rape and pulses. With volatile weather patterns and the risk of pod shatter becoming increasingly common, applying pod sealants at the right time can significantly reduce seed loss and protect crop value.

“With oilseed rape prices currently sitting at £430 per tonne, it’s crucial for farmers to ensure their crops reach full potential,” says Mr. Morris. “We’ll be discussing the latest pod protection strategies and how our pod sealants can be a cost-effective solution to reduce harvest losses.”

Farmers will be able to explore De Sangosse’s trusted Pod-Stik sealant and discuss the benefits of timely application to secure their harvests.

Slug Control: A Global Approach to a Persistent Problem

Deroceras reticulatum, common names the “grey field slug” and “grey garden slug”, is a species of small air-breathing land slug, a terrestrial pulmonate gastropod mollusk in the family Agriolimacidae. This species is an important agricultural pest.

Another critical issue for farmers heading into the autumn season is slug control. De Sangosse will showcase its market-leading Ferric Phosphate slug pellet, a solution that has been proven to effectively manage slug populations with its unrivalled baiting power.

“Slugs remain one of the most economically damaging pests in UK agriculture,” says Mr. Morris. “Our Ferric Phosphate solution is designed to be both effective and environmentally-friendly, with long-lasting control that helps farmers protect their crops.”

During the event, experts will walk farmers through the latest slug control strategies, emphasising the importance of pellet choice, timing, and monitoring for the most effective defense. Attendees will learn how to make informed decisions regarding slug pellet selection and apply them for optimal protection.

Spray Trailer Demonstrations: See It, Learn It, Apply It

A fully equipped spray trailer will be featured throughout the event, offering live demonstrations on nozzle choice, spraying conditions, and the impact of adjuvants on spray performance. Visitors will have the opportunity to see firsthand how different variables affect spray coverage and efficacy, and how these insights can be applied to their own operations.

“We want farmers to leave with a deeper understanding of spray technology and how to optimise their practices for better results,” explains Mr. Morris. “The science behind better spraying will be front and centre, giving sprayer operators the confidence to apply these insights immediately.”

Join the BASIS Knowledge Trail at Stand 712b

As an official partner of the BASIS Knowledge Trail, De Sangosse is offering BASIS points for those looking to further their professional development. The event offers the perfect platform for agronomists and farmers to discover new solutions ahead of the next growing season.

“Cereals is the ideal venue for agronomic discovery, and we’re here to support that journey,” concludes Mr. Morris. “Whether it’s water quality, nutrient unlocking, or resistance management, stand 712b is the place to find the tools, knowledge, and support to help you grow smarter.”

Visit De Sangosse at Stand 712b at Cereals Event 2025 to take advantage of the latest crop protection technologies and expert advice that will help you stay ahead in today’s rapidly changing agricultural landscape.

Agronomy Club – May 2025 Crop Rotations & Nitrogen Planning

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

Ceres Research delivered their first Agronomy Club webinar, focused on weather impacts, nitrogen and rotations. These webinars are designed to help aid your decisions and plan for upcoming agronomy, powered by the latest scientific data.

The webinar slides can be viewed below along with an overarching summary of the discussions.

Click here to view the webinar slide deck.

Weather Conditions and Impact on Crops: Danni provided an update on current weather conditions, highlighting the increase in temperatures and decrease in rainfall compared to previous years. She explained the impact of these changes on crop growth and yield, noting that global wheat production is estimated to fall by 6% for each degree of temperature increase. Danni also discussed the East Atlantic and Western Russia surface air pressure pattern and its effect on storm tracks and moisture content across Europe which may be one of the causes behind the dry spring this year. 

Yield Expectations and Grain Quality: Alex discussed yield expectations for various crops, focusing on winter wheat. He explained the inverse relationship between crop yield and grain protein content, known as the dilution effect. Alex presented data showing that linking yield and grain quality is complex and emphasised the need for monitoring and data recording at the farm level to tailor crop management decisions. 

Nitrogen Applications and Crop Health: Jock provided insights into nitrogen applications and their impact on crop health. He explained that most crops have received the intended amount of nitrogen, which is now waiting for rainfall to be absorbed. Jock discussed the importance of monitoring nitrogen levels and the potential benefits of foliar urea applications for milling wheat. He also highlighted the need to protect crops from rust and septoria infections. 

New Season Nitrogen Prices: Jock shared information on new season nitrogen prices, anticipating that market prices would be released next week, likely around £315-£325. He mentioned the competitiveness of Granular Urea and liquid fertilizer prices compared to ammonium nitrate. Jock suggested that farmers might secure some nitrogen at these prices and worry about payment terms later. 

Crop Rotation and Break Crops: Jock discussed crop rotation options, emphasising the importance of selecting break crops that offer good yield potential and reduced risk. He highlighted the benefits of growing HEAR rape for its premium price and potential to de-risk cabbage stem flea beetle pressure. Jock also mentioned the upcoming trials days and the need to replace septoria-susceptible varieties with more robust options. 

Open Discussion and Q&A: Tim facilitated the open discussion session, inviting participants to ask questions and share their experiences. Various questions were raised about T3 fungicides, septoria infections, nitrogen applications, and biostimulants. Jock provided detailed answers and insights, emphasising the importance of protecting crops and making informed decisions based on weather conditions and crop health.

  • Fungicides: Thoughts on T3 fungicides for milling wheat? Jock explained that the decision depends on the effectiveness of T2 applications and the weather forecast. He emphasised the importance of protecting crops from rust and septoria infections. 
  • Septoria Infections: What is the likelihood of septoria infections after rain? Jock explained that septoria is likely to start from the bottom of the crop and move up, depending on the duration of wet conditions. He emphasised the importance of timely fungicide applications. 
  • Nitrogen Applications: Is there a cutoff for applying the last 50 kg of nitrogen in feed wheat? Jock explained that the decision depends on the amount of nitrogen already applied and the likelihood of rainfall. He suggested that late applications may not provide a significant yield response. 
  • Biostimulants: What biostimulants, if any, may provide relief to drought stress? Danni explained that biostimulants are very site specific (including crop type and variety, soil type, growth stage, type of application etc) and so whilst certain products including amino acids for example can manipulate crop response to drought stress, more evidence is needed for individual farming types to show more concrete evidence to support their use. 
  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

The Strawberry Patent Battle: Seeds, Speculation, and Jurisdiction

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

“This case, relating to infringement of a US plant patent, deals with the evidentiary burden required to show infringement of a plant patent in the US, as well as highlighting the problems associated with asserting IP rights in relation to breeding programs conducted across different jurisdictions.

A US plant patent provides protection for asexually produced plants (apart from tuber propagated plants and uncultivated plants).  A plant patent owner has the right to exclude third parties from “asexually reproducing the plant, and from using, offering for sale, or selling the plant so reproduced, or any of its parts, throughout the United States, or from importing the plant so reproduced, or any parts thereof, into the United States.”  Notably, in contrast to plant variety rights, a plant patent does not provide protection against unauthorised export of the protected plant.

The case relates to the breeding of strawberries, with the patentee (Driscoll) in 2019 alleging that California Berry Cultivars (CBC) had infringed three of their US plant patents, firstly by cross-breeding the patented varieties in Spain, and then secondly by importing seed derived from the cross-breeding program into the US.

In strawberries, the male plant provides the pollen, and the female plant produces the fruit and seeds.  However, most strawberry flowers include both male and female reproductive parts, and so in a cross-breeding event, any single variety could be used as either the male or the female parent.

Driscoll’s allegation relating to infringement as a result of unauthorised importation of seed was based on the argument that their patented plants were used as female plants for crossbreeding, and therefore the seeds imported in the US were a “part” of a patented plant.  To support this allegation, they needed to provide evidence as to which variety was used as the female in each cross.  However, the CBC’s breeding plans did not specify which variety was used as the female in each cross, and there was no evidence of how each cross was performed.  The Judge found that Driscoll relied on “guesswork and speculation” regarding the parents in the cross-breeding, and had failed to meet its evidentiary burden in showing that the seed was indeed a ‘part’ of one of their protected varieties.  The Judge remarked that “the mere existence of progeny of a patented plant does not support an inference that that Defendants imported and used seeds that were grown on a Patented Plant, as opposed to the other variety in any given cross”. 

The Judge further dismissed the allegation of infringement based on cross-breeding because this activity was performed in Spain and therefore outside of the jurisdiction of Driscoll’s US plant patents.

Breeding programs often take place across multiple jurisdictions, and the protection afforded can differ between patents, plant patents, and plant variety rights.  This case again highlights the complexities in adequately protecting innovation in this sector, the challenges in obtaining evidence relating to third-party activities, and protecting the rights of breeders.

This article was written by Partner & Patent Attorney Punita Shah, and Trainee Patent Attorney Delphine Lauté-Caly.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.

From policy to plates: rethinking the National Food Strategy

Member News
The views expressed in this Member News article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of Agri-TechE.

In December 2024, five months after taking office for the first time in 14 years, the Labour government announced that it would develop a new national food strategy in 2025. Led by the Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs (Defa), the new strategy will be underpinned by four key areas for improvement: food security, health, environment, and the economy.

The government is keen to hear from a range of interested individuals, businesses, and industry professionals. Defra has even commissioned a new citizen’s advisory council to test public support for potential measures such as mandatory health reporting and policies to reduce meat consumption – all of which are likely to shape the contents of the new strategy.

A food strategy is not a new area of government policymaking. In fact, this strategy comes only four years after the last strategy, led by Henry Dimbleby, which shed bleak light on pervasive regional inequalities that restrict access to healthy food. Dimbleby’s efforts were subsequently shelved by the then government when the impact of the pandemic threatened chaos for UK supply chains.

It is therefore no surprise that health outcomes and broadening access to healthy food dominates the political discourse around this food strategy too. Several policy interventions have been made ahead of its publication, particularly aimed at reducing childhood obesity. For example, widely anticipated advertising restrictions have been announced, and the government has published a consultation on its plans to expand the scope and threshold of the soft drinks levy.  Improving public health and tackling obesity have clearly shot up the political agenda and joining this up with food and farming policy is the key to successfully achieving these policy aims. Aligning with the government’s thinking on this will be crucial for food producers to thrive.

Although the exact shape and scale of the national food strategy is yet to be revealed, it is clear that the government will take a more interventionist approach than its predecessors to improving the nation’s diet.

If you’d like to discuss this in more detail, including how GK Strategy can support you with government relations and communication, please contact Lauren Atkins.

  • *I have permission from the copyright holder to publish this content and images.